‘Raped’ Michael Jackson Was Castrated And Mark Lester Fathered Paris Jackson
MICHAEL Jackson Watch: Anorak’s at-a-glance look at Michael Jackson in the news – Mark Lester is Paris Jackson’s dad, and Jacko castration drugs…
News Of The World: “I’M JACKSON’S GIRL REAL DAD”
Oliver film star Mark’s amazing baby confession.
It’s Mark Lester. He’s god father to all of Jackson’s three children. He says he’s Paris Jackson’s sperm daddy. Girl for sale… Girl for sale…
Says Mark:
“It’s been a secret for so long. In 1996 Michael asked me if I would give him my sperm and I said yes. It was a gift to him, no money was paid, it was something I was honoured to do. He wanted children so badly…”
Don’t bother to wrap the gift. No need for a card. Sperm is the perfect emergency present for brithdays, weddings, Bar Mitzvah’s and more!
“With Michael’s mother Katherine now their legal guardian it’s like the kids are being isolated. Up until Michael’s memorial I was in touch with them on a weekly basis…
“This isn’t what Michael would have wanted. I feel I have to come forward, as my only way of saying, ‘Please don’t shut me out!’”
It being what Jackson would have wanted, Mark Lester tells us about Jackson’s sex life:
“Michael found it very difficult to have relationships with women. He found the sexual act something he couldn’t do. When he was about 16 or 17 he had a very famous female child star who basically jumped on him, naked in his hotel room, and tried to seduce him.”
Miss Piggy raped him?
“He became very scared, and found it so disturbing he couldn’t perform.”
But Mark was up to it.
Oom-pa-pa! Oom-pa-pa!
That’s how it goes,
Oom-pa-pa! Oom-pa-pa!
Ev’ryone knows.
The Moonwalk method
“He said he wanted to moonwalk on the moon, and wanted me there to be his buddy. I didn’t expect it to happen, but I accepted. He had an incredible aura about him. Whatever he said, however short notice, you’d go along with it.
“Sperm donation was the same.”
Tor The clinic
“I went in a bit sheepishly and came out a like a teenage boy leaving a porn film,” recalled Mark.
Reviewing the Situation
Mark said: “Paris is very pale, with blue eyes. All my daughters, apart from my eldest, are fair with blue eyes. So many people have commented on how alike Harriet and Paris look. Our families often holidayed together and staff, especially nannies, watching the children play together would say how similar the two girls looked.”
Uri Geller – the spoon bender – is on Sky News to say: “I knew it all along.”
Sunday Mirror: “Michael Jackson had jab to curb sex urges for young boys”
A doctor has revealed how he prescribed Michael Jackson a “chemical castration” drug to suppress his sexual urges towards under-age boys.
Oliver! Oliver! Never before has a boy wanted more…
Jacko – notorious for sharing his bed with young boys – took a powerful drug given to sex offenders to cool his sexual appetite.
The drug – Depo Provera – was prescribed to him by highly-respected Dr Alimorad Farshchian, who was concerned about Jackson’s behaviour. Normally used for birth control, it restricts men’s flow of testosterone-producing brain hormones.
And asked if Dr Farshchian’s had prescribed drugs to Jacko to curb his sex drive, his spokesman confirmed: “Yes, that’s exactly it. He was trying to help Michael.”
Al together now:
Consider yourself at home.
Consider yourself one of the family.
We’ve taken to you so strong.
It’s clear we’re going to get along.
Consider yourself well in…
The People: “Amazing fight that left star looking like THIS”
See picture of Jackson looking just like, er, Jackson.
Posted: 9th, August 2009 | In: Celebrities, Key Posts Comments (21) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
September 10th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
wtf
August 11th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
As said, there is no doubt that Michael was abused – I suspect far more horrendously than I can imagine. His father takes ‘self-serving’ to new levels, possibly pimping the very young Michael and others of his children for money and fame for the Jacksons. The man is contemptible.
As I’ve heard said many times, MJ’s life was complex. He was a complex personality. I loved his music and my heart went out to him as an individual. May he rest in peace.
But this does not detract from the point that it is unhealthy for us to make certain allowances for people who are either moneyed and famous, or who evoke our compassion. Just as it is not right for adult men without Jackson’s fame to sleep with children, such status does not make it right. Doing so, anyone with an IQ of a ten year old, can understand that there will be speculation and accusations. To continue to do so after this has been severely criticised, even prosecuted, is very concerning..
Michael did have control here over at least some of the criticism. He had the choice to acknowledge that it is a behaviour that at the very least could put children at serious risk. He had the choice to stop doing so -and he chose not to.
All the feeble reasoning around, ‘He thought he was still a child’, ‘He only wanted to care for them’ etc are missing the point. We all have to behave in ways that protect and nurture young children. We cannot make exceptions for those we think of as innocent. Abusers are masters at such deception.
One can be close to and enjoy the love and company of children without sleeping with them. It is a farce to suggest otherwise.
Appropriate behaviours protect children and vulnerable people in a society.
Conjecture and criticism are to be expected. Most men, without the privilege and status of our rich and famous, would not be permitted to get away with such behaviour.
Michael did choose to continue an unhealthy relationship with children, therefore inviting comment and criticism.
August 10th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
If you believe Michael ‘.that he was an abused child and certainly no one has come forwarded to deny this. The tale he told of what his father did to him was harrowing.
He poured his heart out on National TV. I believe it was a cry for help,he certainly needed help. I have no idea if the stories about Michael are true I was not there. He admitted to sleeping with young boys’ but for comfort, nothing more. Once more I have no idea.. I do however feel that it is wrong for these men to now come forward claiming to be the father of these children. These children knew only one father,Michael. He was their Dad there one and only Dad and they loved him the way only a child can love a parent. They are grieving his loss, how must they feel when they read these stories, they cannot go and talk with dad and ask him are they true, So, now there are doubts’ one day they will have to go and do DNA tests.If these men donated their sperm I am sure Michael thanked them, possibly even paid them well. Why did they have to do this? could they have not let the children be left with the memory of their Dad. Instead they have taken them out of that magical world that Michael created for them and placed them in the real world.
A world that they did not yet need to know.
August 10th, 2009 at 11:55 am
What right does Mark Lester have disrupting the poor children’s lives any further…None!!!
IF he was a sperm donor as others have also claimed to be…surely this is done anonymously. He has no right now to crawl out of the woodwork making his ludicrous claims.
Wether or not MJ fathered is his three children isn’t the issue and should be left alone! When all said and done, he was their Daddy! Someone thinking they can have the law changed to suit themselves is wrong both morally and ethically.
* How many other sperm donors have wondered how many potential children they have helped create?
* How many men and women given the chance to become parents wonder who the donor may or may not have been?
* How many children have been born through this procedure are curious as to who there biological father may or may not be?
The answer is: They’ll never know!!!
The procedure is anonymous and kept anonymous for the best interests of everyone.
If Mark Lester is allowed to pursue his claim…then it opens a can of worms for the rest of the world on anonymity laws!
Mark should get on with his life raising the children he knows are his and leave the Jackson bairns alone!!! They’ve suffered enough!!!
August 10th, 2009 at 12:36 am
Come’on people. Stop believing in those tabloid style reportings. Michael Jackson is just a normal man — a son, a father, a friend. He was no doubt been gifted with very amazing musical and dance talent that cannot easily be matched . He has unselfishly used his talent to entertain us for the last 40 years, and we enjoyed it. He is just somebody who loves to perform and have so much creativity in him to keep things new for his fans. If you listen to his own words, you will find that he has been very consistent over all the years. There is no lack of articles documenting his interviews and video clips of his interviews on the internet, so just let the man speak for himself. You will find that he is simply a humble, courteous human being who has a lot of compassion for children and the poor people. Even after the 1993 and 2003 trials, Michael Jackson’s words and vision for the world remained consistent with what he expressed during his younger years. There’s nothing strange about this man. He just happens to be in the spotlight and the media made money off him by creating sensationalism.
August 10th, 2009 at 12:15 am
Knew it, knew it. Lots of stuff will come out now, and MJ has not even been given a proper burial yet. So sad. Still, he is off this earth and probably on the moon so to speak. Paris is very much like Harriett though. Paris will now have some half sisters to get along with and that will be good. What about the other children though.
August 9th, 2009 at 11:54 pm
“Jarvis Cocker did everyone a favour when he stopped Jackson in his “Child Saviour” tracks”
Er – how did he do that exactly?
Wasn’t Jackson supposedly still sleeping with boys years AFTER that self-serving prank in 1996? (which, incidentally, Jarvis has recently claimed that he regrets)
Also, I’d sure like to know who this “doctor” who supposedly gave Jackson “castration” drugs. This source sounds very spotty at best.
August 9th, 2009 at 10:39 pm
As for that fan who thought M J was “young” – she also thought he’d done all sorts for the world.
I am puzzled as to what those things were, apart from three or four catchy records, some great dancing and a dodgy way ofrelating to boys from a poor background.
Jarvis Cocker did everyone a favour when he stopped Jackson in his “Child Saviour” tracks. What was hideous is how many mothers pimped their kids.
August 9th, 2009 at 10:35 pm
I don’t suppose a very rich man ever has real friends.
Sadly for M Jackson, his most devoted fans do him no favours either. They are so deluded..not least the “young man” fan.
August 9th, 2009 at 9:20 pm
Judy, that was the trouble, all the people that said he touched them. Shamon to all the God Squad MJ lovin folk out there. And one day, I hope to see someone other than me (who was and still is a fan of MJ) who can come on here and actually frickin’ spell. The more of you that come on here who can’t write, the more we’ll think you’re a bunch of divs.
So there.
August 9th, 2009 at 8:13 pm
That should have been “Us and In style” sorry Time for the “Life” error
August 9th, 2009 at 8:11 pm
Though I do not believe Michael was “pure and innocent” by any stretch of the imagination, I do believe he struggled with various forms of mental illness during his life. I do not believe his actions were” criminal”, in the sense that he could not CONTROL his urges and actions. He needed help, and because of his talent and social status, and mental illness still to this day being a huge mystery in a lot of respects, the help was slow coming, and there were many “wolves” in sheeps clothing. However, I believe Mark is sincere. (he was after all the childrens Godfather, not a publicist, doctor or high profile media figure in Jackson’s life) At this point in time, Jackson’s legal affairs are tremendous, and media outlets are really the only way to bring any attention to this matter. These children do not belong with their mother, she showed very little interest in them until Michaels death… and will probably crawl back into the hole she came out of if the insurance is not paid. Also, People magazine desrves a bit more credit than tabloids. They set themselves far apart from other magazines such asn life and in style, and pride themselves in printing only verifiable information, and apologize directly if misinformation does bleed through (and no i DONT work for them they are owned by Time Warner *edit*) I pray for Michaels children, and hope peopel will leave him alone to rest in peace. They were too cowardly to ask the questions while he was alive to answer them, and now are trying to beat it out of him from the grave, it’s aweful!
August 9th, 2009 at 6:57 pm
Young man? He was 50 years old.
August 9th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
This is just terrible let the young man die in peace! I believe he up in heaven with my Lord, but its the same all over again, you couldn’t or wouldn’t accept what he was trying to do in his lifetime for others,all seems you’re doing is capitalizing on his death, when you should have prayed for him in life to continue to do great things for so many people; but you never got apast your own lives,he touched so many people, and nations,why can’t you focus on the good things the young man did, and stop with down-grading him after his death! Everyone makes mistakes, but just makes us human,but if God can forgive him how he lived his life, I don’t see you have any say in it; Michael may you R.I.P. and be proud of what you did for millions of people world-wide! You will never be forgotten, just because of your good works for others! Just let him rest in peace all thru-out the world!
August 9th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
wow…will you people never stop? this “article”, if that’s what you want to call it, is ridiculous; and mark lester apparently was no real friend of michaels either. if he was, he would have kept this information private. WHY did he go to the biased media when there were other ways to get this accomplished privately. Poor poor Michael. i sincerely hope he cant see (or hear) whats been going on since he left. it surely would break his fragile heart. RIP sweet Michael.
August 9th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
The point of living in a free country is that one is entitled to consider the information at one’s disposal and to form one’s own opinion.
The media have given MJ a rough time – and I do not condone the hounding of people that they undertake to present cheap and scandalous reporting.
However, to my view, there are issues about Michael’s relationships with young boys that are worthy of consideration. Is it appropriate for an adult male of any age – let alone in his 40′s – to sleep with children? No it is not. MJ is no exception in this case.
If it were an ordinary man down the road who made such claims to explain his luring children to his home and sleeping with them, there would be a public uproar. The only difference I can see is of money and status. If you have these then you can claim to be ‘different’.
Should we allow those who have money and power to be in a position to abuse children and get away with it? No we should not.
Whether or not MJ did have sexual relations with minors is clearly up for debate but the question is should we allow children to be at risk by declaring certain privileged elements of society as ‘different’.
This is the real issue – much of the rest is just a diversion.
August 9th, 2009 at 1:35 pm
yes! totally agree with Barbara.STOP ALL THIS! RIP.MJ
August 9th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
Its all over the Media today, Anorak satirises what is being reported.
Mark Lester claims to be a close friend of the late MJ, and its he who is allegedly claiming to be Paris Jacksons father.
Whilst alive MJ was a very controversial and ostentatious figure, you may have ‘loved’ him, but it won’t stop people speculating on his lifestyle.
If his nearest and dearest wanted privacy after his death they could have stopped courting the media, they chose not to. Sales of his albums have forged ahead as a result and so has the gossip and mickey taking.
Death is the end of life , not the start of ‘respect’, if people want ‘respect’ they have their lives to earn it
August 9th, 2009 at 10:52 am
totally agree with barbara, please stop.
i luv the man as do many others and the more u write stuff like this the moree the public is going to reject ur articles.
August 9th, 2009 at 10:18 am
You should write to the News of the World, The Sunday Mirror and the People then. They are the ones printing these articles. Anorka is pulling them all together for you so that you can shout about them all in one place
August 9th, 2009 at 9:35 am
AGAIN!!! STOP THROWING S*** ON THIS POOR DEAD MAN. HE WAS RIDICULED ENOUGH NI HIS LIFE. IT’S A SHAME. STOP! AND AS FAR AS BEING A PEDOPHILE IS CONCERNED. YOU SHOULD KNOW HE WAS FOUND INNOCENT. THE THING IS THAT BEING INNOCENT IS NOT A TABLOID FACT TO SPECULATE ON, IS IT? YOU ARE NOT READY TO ACCEPT AN INNOCENT AND PURE MAN. YOU WILL BE JUDGED ON DAY.