Daily Mail Sticks The Louboutin Into Coleen Rooney
HANDS up which Daily Mail readers want to know what kept “new mum Coleen Rooney “up till 2am”?
On Page 3, you can find out the answer. But before we go there, the Star also has Coleen on its page 3: “ROON IS NAPPY DODGER.”
“He revealed yesterday that he would love to have a shot at changing two-week-old son Kai.”
Poor Wayne can’t get close enough to Kai to change the little love’s bum because Coleen keeps getting in the way. And after that talks of excreta, we move to the Mail, and learn:
“Portrait of a WAG out on the town (in £500 Louboutin heels) one week after giving birth.”
These heels are “six inches” and qualify as “platforms”. This undercurrent of spite is added to on the Mail’s web version of the story, which clacks its marmalade-coated tongue and asks the question:
So who’s minding the baby, Coleen? Mrs Rooney enjoys first night out after giving birth to Kai
Turns out Coleen’s mum and dad are. So no need to call the social services just yet. Although if shoes shoes get any higher. But if you want real spite, the Mail’s readers are happy to fill in the gaps:
Whether she breast or bottle feeds him is her business. Yet it is hypocritical that she portrays herself as a loving mother and then leaves him at 10 days old to go out. I don’t think many new mothers would have the time, energy or inclination to go on a night out with friends when their baby was a mere 10 days old. She must have someone else who gets up in the night to tend to him.
- Anne, Lancs
i think its disgusting how someone who has giving birth less then 10 days ago.is out clubbing and enjoying their own selfish needs.people like her is the reason this country is so disgraceful.and anyone who thinks this behavior is acceptable.is just as disgusting.and im a 20 year old.who has better morals.
- shannon, manchester,
The foot of the comments section invites anyone to “Report abuse”. Call Haringey 999 without delay….
Posted: 13th, November 2009 | In: Celebrities Comments (11) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- eggman on Daily Mail Sticks The Louboutin Into Coleen Rooney
- yampster on Norway Exports More Porn Than It Imports
- June on For Hire: Engrish Teacher To Learn You Grammer
- June on BBC Says It’s Wonderful That Bruce Forsyth Is Too Ill To Host Strictly Come Dancing
- piglet on X Factor: Jedward, John & Edward, Are Voted Out, But Then
November 14th, 2009 at 1:23 am
Coleen is probably the most normal and is definitely the prettiest of all the WAGs (horrible term) so I’m with June on that one. You go, girlfriend!
November 13th, 2009 at 9:09 pm
Ruby
we are all behind Coleen, and think she deserves a night out with her mates, its Shannon from the DM we are slagging off for being a miserable old spoilsport
November 13th, 2009 at 8:29 pm
Oh for goodness sake, get over it! She’s a 23 year old woman she can wear heels as high as she likes! You people must have little to do other than give out about a young woman going out to enjoy herself! The baby is with his grandparents. Mind your own business and leave her alone!
November 13th, 2009 at 7:46 pm
She’s probably a City fan now I come to think of it. Wonder how many kids of her own she has?
November 13th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
Actually , I thought she had migrated across from the Sun, but I do wonder in which decade of the last century she was 20, or if indeed she is a she?
After all, 10 day old babies aren’t what they used to be and tend to nap a lot these days instead of being out and about wreaking havoc. Tsk!
November 13th, 2009 at 3:19 pm
Shannon doesn’t exactly strike me as a Daily Mail reader. Sure, her sentiments seem to match their usual standards, but the grammar is awful!
I make it thirteen mistakes…..
November 13th, 2009 at 3:13 pm
…friend of Dorothy…? surely not….. he’s always come across as such a butch lad…
November 13th, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Off to see the Wizard?
Did they say he was wearing heels?
November 13th, 2009 at 2:41 pm
Bat
according to the DM Wayne Rooney is in Oz……
November 13th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
For goodness sake! Life doesn’t stop because you have kids. As long as the baby was looked after by loving grandparents, who the hell cares?
Was she photographed staggering about drunk out of her head or throwing up in a gutter? If not, people should mind their own bloody business and leave her alone.
I don’t suppose they’d bat an eyelid if her husband was out until 2am. Well, maybe if he was wearing 6 inch heels there may be some cause for comment.
November 13th, 2009 at 11:21 am
so she leaves a 10 day old baby with its grandparents for a few hours, and wears 6 inch heels - oh tsk how very dare she?
Friends of ours babysat their 14 day old grandchild while their daughter went for a night out, in 4 inch heels(this was a few years back) all went well, til new Mum stumbled on her way back in and fell and broke her ankle…..I suppose shannon the moralist will take comfort from that snippet