MADELEINE McCann – Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann –Our Maddie is back on the front pages. She’s in New Zealand. Shells in France. She’s in America. Possibly…
So far, Madeleine has also been seen in: Italy, Sweden, Portugal, Spain, Morocco, Majorca, Belgium, Bosnia, France, Australia, Brazil, Wales, Malta, Italy and Dorset.
The Star (front page): “Maddie: Pics the cops kept secret”
MADELEINE McCann could be 12,000 miles away in New Zealand, it was revealed last night.
She got there on a boat?
A security guard at the store in Dunedin on New Zealand’s South Island was convinced the child was Madeleine. She asked the girl her name and she replied in a British accent: “Hailey.” Then she was led away by a portly man in shorts who grabbed her hand.
In. New. Zealand. Aisling Symes?
A girl whose face was so familiar to the world’s media, and who could be recognised by a store detective in New Zealand, made it from Portugal to, well, New Zealand. And the police ignored this vital clue. Shame on them. We armchair detectives would have done better.
The security guard was so suspicious she contacted Interpol who sent the images to Portuguese police in July 2008.
She spotted the girl in 2008? She was so suspicious she neither followed the man nor took a photo? PA newswire reports:
The files reportedly comprise hundreds of pages of information, including CCTV images that show a young girl who looks like Madeleine being led into a New Zealand supermarket in 2007.
In December 2007, to be exact, the year Madeleine McCann went missing and became the media’s Our Maddie.
But, because detectives archived the case nearly two years ago, the photos were never released and have been gathering dust in a 2,000-page case file locked away inside a police HQ in the Algarve resort of Portimao.
The photos were never released to the media. Should they have been? Is there a law that says all media must see all pictures submitted to the police of Our Maddie? Is there a golden rule that all images must be published in said media?
The evidence includes hundreds of sightings, photographs and leads from the US to Hong Kong collected since the investigation was shelved.
To think no copper wanted a trip to Hong Kong to investigate. Ok, the hotel would not have been five star but travel broadens the mind, and all that…
The Sun (front page): “Maddie: New File”
These are “THE SECRET SIGHTINGS”.
No, not secret from the police. Secret from you. Helpfully, we’ve got he picture and can entertain you with it. See that grainy image of the girl and the man’s chubby legs.
Two of the CCTV images were taken in New Zealand on December 5, 2007, and forwarded to Portuguese police by Interpol. In one photo a little blonde girl peeps out from under her fringe as she is led into a shop by a portly man wearing shorts.
Peeps.
In the other the girl is seen leaving the shop with the man and a little boy.
She has the same hairstyle as Maddie when she went missing on May 3 that year from a holiday apartment in Portugal aged three.
She’s got the Our Maddie Cut. It’s caught on. Any other sightings?
A girl described as “a little elf” – in a pyjama top like the one Maddie had on when she was taken – was spotted being “summoned” from a shop near Murcia, Spain, by an “unkempt” man 12 days later.
Murcia and murkier…
In August 2008, a woman reported a Newcastle man acting suspiciously in Villamoura, 50 miles from Praia da Luz.
Geordie behaving oddly…? Was he not wearing a Newcastle FC shirt and looking emotional?
She says the man, who she also saw in May 2006, took pictures of her children.
2006!
In July 2008, a Scottish mum reported seeing a blonde girl who looked like Madeleine in Albufeira, Portugal, with a group of gipsies.
Yeah, its’ the gypsies. Let’s get them again. Anything else?
A report from Spokane, Washington State, USA, said a girl like Maddie was seen on October 9, 2008, with a Portuguese man. According to an informant, he ran a child trafficking operation. Chillingly, the file also contains information sent by Lieutenant Emilie Moreau of the French police about a photo of a little girl being sexually abused on a website. She told the Portuguese: “We think the girl looks like Maddie.” Inspector Paiva replied: “There is nothing relevant. The girl does not physically resemble Madeleine.”
First the fat man. Then the gypsies. Then the paedos! It’s the usual suspects.
As for this fat man in the New Zealand shop, the Mail calls the news and the CCTV footage “astonishing”.
The Express reports:
More than 50 sightings stretching from Europe to the US, Hong Kong and New Zealand are contained in a disturbing 2,000-page police document in Portugal.
Why is it disturbing? Are your disturbed by the sightings? By the police? Or by how a missing child became a global obsession? After three summer’s of reporting, the media has come up with a single clue as to what happened to Our Maddie.
A source close to the McCanns said: “They are extremely angry that this file has been sitting in an office collecting dust. Quite frankly it’s an outrage and a disgrace.”
Their spokesman Clarence Mitchell added: “They are incredibly frustrated that this was sitting there and being disregarded by the Portuguese police. They were shocked when they saw the scale of the information that had come in and the lack of action taken. There are potential leads in the file that are now being followed up by our investigators.
“It’s more than a pity that the file has just sat there for so long and simply marked ‘not relevant’ by the Portuguese. There are also images in the file that are strikingly similar to Madeleine and are being looked into.”
And the McCanns can now look. They have the documents. And they may well have the money soon, as they seek libel damages from Goncalo Amaral.
Meanwhile, Madeleine McCann is missing – still missing…
Posted: 3rd, March 2010 | In: Key Posts, Madeleine McCann Comments (18) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
March 4th, 2010 at 6:54 am
Well one of them isn’t Madeleine after all (as if we didn’t know that already) and quite rightly the NZ police WON’T name the family. Thank heavens they have decency and are respecting this family’s privacy.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10629897
Acting Southern Police District Commander Inspector Dave Campbell told One News police will not name the family or provide any details of their identity.
March 4th, 2010 at 6:14 am
Paul, L., would they permit them to ‘barge in’ – doubtful. Would they permit to come over and go over information with them – yes. We’ve worked with the UK. The UK finally was invited or asked or whatever and went to Portugal to help with the case.
Paul L, I disagree the French Police didn’t take it seriously. If they hadn’t taken the picture they saw seriously, they would not have bothered sending it to the Porguese Police saying they thought it resembled Maddie and obviously they would want a response back.
Even if they re-opened the case, is there be enough man-power to review all the leads over the last two years that were filed away,least of all investigate them all?
March 4th, 2010 at 3:39 am
Cheryl,
With all due respect, would your cops allow the PJ to barge onto their turf to investigate the supposed sighting in the US?
These cases are all clearly in the jurisdiction of other Forces, who didn’t seem to take them seriously, though I assume and hope that the French Gendarmerie are investigating the abuse on internet.
March 4th, 2010 at 12:03 am
I think if a child says her name is Hailey, then it probably is Hailey, NOT Madeleine. So in my book that alone would make the sighting “not relevent”.
What a crazy farce.
.
March 3rd, 2010 at 11:16 pm
Bat
Have to admit I agree with you over this file, and just about with the case too.
I think the PJ should reopen it, and under complete secrecy just get on with it.
Its had far too much publicity oxygen, and nothing is resolved, and that could be as a result of the publicity.
Lets hope lessons learned for when the next untended child goes missing.
March 3rd, 2010 at 11:10 pm
Cheryl
Not relevant might (believe it or not) might mean ……that it wasn’t relevant.
If the French police have found out the childs name I hope they managed to catch the creeps that were doing this. However it doesn’t seem relevant to Madeleine’s case.
March 3rd, 2010 at 10:49 pm
Jennifer, obviously they were investigating child porn on the internet and they did make it a point to send the picture of one to the PJ with their remarks. If Pavia stated as said ‘it was not relevant…’ then do you think the Portugese Police bothered to follow up on it? The French Police investigating the child porn would not have just dropped their efforts to find out who the child was hearing that from the Portugal Police, they would have continued searching to find out who the victim was. Next question, Jennifer, where they able to find a name or is the victim’s name still unknown?
March 3rd, 2010 at 10:35 pm
As usual the McCanns do nothing, their hugely-paid detective does nothing (except yabber on about the PdL “lair”) and the PJ get it in the neck from the wretched couple.
These people want everything to suit their own agenda.
And why, please, do they still refuse to get the case re-opened? I’d like Cheryl to attempt an explanation of what frightens them so much.
March 3rd, 2010 at 10:27 pm
Cheryl @6.
Lieutenant Emilie Moreau of the French police should be investigating whether it was Madeleine or not don’t you think. If a child ANY child is used in this way it shouldn’t make any difference WHO the child is.
And please remember that these sightings were not in Portugal they were out of the PJ’s juristiction. Do you think that if a child went missing from the UK and was spotted in Australia the British cops could just go over there and investigate?
The first sighting was reported by George Brooks and if you read the files you can see that the PJ did follow it up:
http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic5913.html
So how do we know that the PJ didn’t follow up these leads that we are being told about.
March 3rd, 2010 at 10:21 pm
Clarence Mitchell told Sky News it was disgraceful that information about possible sightings of Madeleine has only emerged now after sitting in a box since 2008, when the case was shelved by Portuguese police.
“The McCanns have been tearing their hair out for a long time, they’re very frustrated this information has been sitting in a file since July 2008,” he said.
“This information is gold dust to them. Kate and Gerry need all of it and they want a full review of all the information it contains.
“Our investigators are working at times with one hand tied behind their back.
“Any leads must come through Portugal but they must come to Kate and Gerry.
CCTV
CCTV of the girl spotted in New Zealand
“Our investigators will now work very hard and three years on it will hopefully lead to the breakthrough Kate and Gerry have been waiting for.”
March 3rd, 2010 at 10:06 pm
Cheryl, do you seriously think that a policeman or anyone for that matter would refuse to investigate if they thought for one minute it could be the child they were looking for? I’m sure the Portuguese policeman had more of an idea of how Madeleine looked than a French policeman who wasn’t involved in the case.
Do you think the PJ are that stupid and lazy or too busy with their boozy lunches to actually care about a little girl? You seem to have a very low opinion of them and how the hell do you know what detail they were looking for in the pics?
I am pretty sure that they would have done their best to investigate any of these ’sightings’ if there was even the slightest chance it could have been Madeleine. How many sightings did they investigate? How much time was wasted looking into the ones we know about? You only have to look at the second paragraph above to see she’s been spotted all over the world.
March 3rd, 2010 at 9:11 pm
Here we go again with sightings all over the world… Ludicrous!
Ludicrous to expect the PJ to drop everything to go investigate each and every one when the McCs themselves wouldn´t co-operate with the investigation.
Ludicrous to expect the public to continually swallow these sightings as being relevant – if they were the police in the countries in question would have said so.
A few weeks ago she was in a lair near to PdL, now she is in New Zealand, or maybe Hong Kong.
!
March 3rd, 2010 at 9:01 pm
Bat E Bird, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that not only you but some others are ’sick of seeing headlines about this bloody file’, that was finally turned over to the McCann’s lawyer.
A police officer from France sees a photo of a little girl being sexually abused on a website and tells the Portugese Police “we think the girl looks like Maddie.” Pavia replies: “There is nothing relevant. The girl does not physically resemble Madeleine.” No doubt in my mind that little girl being sexually abused would not physically resemble the same picture of a healthy, laughing, smiling Maddie everyone has seen including Portugese Police. Is that all they were looking for in any pics sent to them, to see a picture of that sweet, healthy, laughing little girl as she looked before she was possibly abducted? Considering Pavia testified that they think she is dead and made it a point to read part of a missive from the UK telling them to investigate the parents as suspects, I have to question just how closely did they look at any pictures sent them.
No doubt most sightings reported are from those people who truly think they saw her but what we think we see is not necessarily what we see. But if another Police Department saw something that gave them enough reason to foward a picture and letter then that should have given solid cause to investigate closely what that Police Department saw with their open mind.
March 3rd, 2010 at 8:57 pm
Another smokescreen to try to hide the fact that they STILL haven’t asked to the case to be re-opened.
Please McCanns stop slagging off the Portuguese police – with whom you resolutely refused to co-operate.
Why not use your famous PI – Mr Edgar? You pay him enough…but, oh yes, he makes up a huge fuss about “suspects” – like the Victoria Beckham lookalike at Barcelona – and then doesn’t even bother to interview witnesses, suspects, passers-by, or indeed anyone at all in Barcelona.
March 3rd, 2010 at 8:11 pm
I wonder who this poor child is who now has her picture shown all over the UK press.
The police obviously thought it irrelevant so why is her picture being shown to the world. Don’t citizens have any privacy.
March 3rd, 2010 at 7:28 pm
I’m sick of seeing headlines about this bloody file!
March 3rd, 2010 at 3:45 pm
One of the reasons that I first became interested in this case was the striking
resemblance between Madeleine and my own daughter at that age.
This in turn reminded me how she was never out of my sight when on holiday
abroad ( or indeed on any occasion when I was in charge of her).
These girls are of a “type” and there must be hundresds of thousands who share
that look – hair, big eyes, big smiles, etc
March 3rd, 2010 at 10:21 am
I’ve always wondered how to become a source.
But then I realised that the process would probably be painful, what with the being reduced down in order to fit into the bottle aspect and then there’s the application of suitable means of sterilisation to cut back on the botulism front.
So that’s me off the McCanns Christmas card list…