Madeleine McCann: The Fat Kiwi’s Innocent But Gypsies Spotted With Our Maddie
MADELEINE McCann – Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann – HAVING exploded back on the front pages with a “secret file” and a 2008 sighting in New Zealand, we can now reveal that the girl spotted with the fat gypsy paedo in an Dunedin shop is NOT Madeleine McCann.
Shop assistant Taryn Dryfhout – you will recall her being identified by British papers a “security guard”; today the Mirror has demoted to “a checkout girl” – “told reporters that she raised the alarm when she saw the girl with a man in a white shirt and shorts walking out of The Warehouse variety store in the South Island city of Dunedin on December 5, 2007”.
She stared at the man and the child.
She said she was so convinced the girl was Madeleine that she asked her name. The girl stumbled nervously and eventually replied, “Hayley,” Dryfhout said.
Or “Hailey“, as the Star told us. And let us review the scene: a stranger has approached your child and asked her name. Do you report them to the cops? And note that this is at the height of the Our Maddie story…
The man and a woman with them acted strangely so police were notified, she said.
The man and woman who had been approached by a stranger who wanted to speak with their child and were being stared at acted strangely… The strange then called the police. Go on…
Dunedin Police Inspector David Campbell says “she is not the missing British girl.”
This news is not reported on any front page. The fat man is innocent, what of the gypsies?
Daily Mirror: “Girl ‘seen in black wig’”
Martin Fricker has news:
Investigators are hunting for a mystery girl in a black wig that a British holidaymaker said was “100% Madeleine McCann“.
So she called out, grabbed the child, created a huge scene and the kidnappers were captured and Madeleine ran free?
The child was seen with two “gypsy” women in a town just 30 miles from Praia da Luz where she disappeared.
We know they were gypsies because..? Well, the Star says:
“SNATHCER GIPSIES DISGUISED MADDIE USING BLAKC WIG”
And in the Mirror:
Jean Godwin, 56, of Widnes, claims she saw her in September 2008. She said: “She was in the middle of the two women holding their hands.
“Her eyes were wide open and my attention was drawn to her large irises. The child was wearing what was clearly a black wig. She was about 3ft 1in and about five years of age. She was white with a pale complexion.
“I couldn’t sleep, I had my husband take me back to look. I’ve been asked how certain I am, I’m 100% sure.”
As sure as that check out girl in New Zealand who said: “I absolutely believe it was her. I have no doubt in my mind“?
Back to Maddie Spotter Godwin and those gypsies:
McCann investigators found one of the women – a Portuguese cleaner.
A gypsy cleaner? So, the woman is known. And she is a suspect?
Another Brit Jeni Weinberger, 38, also identified the cleaner as a woman she saw in Praia da Luz the day Madeleine vanished.
A cleaner on a holiday resort… What are the odds? This is cracking detective work. Go on:
Detectives traced her to an orange grove in Silves and found a Citroen with a doll in it but no trace of the child. The car was traced to a male teacher in Portimao who said the doll was given him by students. Weinberger also identified him as someone she had seen at that time. But police dismissed the evidence.
She lives in an orange grove? Not in a house? And the cops and detectives know the gypsy teacher is ok because they asked the students?
The cleaner could not be reached to comment. A McCann source said: “It’s one of the strongest leads.”
In which case, keep looking…
Madeleine McCann is missing. There are no suspects. The parents are innocent. There are no clues. There is just speculation…
Image: 3 year old Bushra Binhisa with her father Hamid, mother Hafidah and sister Souhaila in the family home in the city of Zinat, Morocco, September 26, 2007. A picture of Bushra stirred up the world press through her likeness with the disappeared English girl Madeleine…
Posted: 4th, March 2010 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (9) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink




















































March 4th, 2010 at 4:47 pm
A sighting a day keeps the nasty questions away…
March 4th, 2010 at 4:13 pm
GBH. You’re almost certainly right. Dead or alive, poor Madeleine will most likely be found near PdL. (IMO)
But like Bat E Bird, I wish they’d shut up about it. Not because I don’t care, I’m desperate to hear news about Madeleine, but because it does the case no favours at all. There’s been a quiet dignity to the whole affair of late. I think we’ve all assumed that the search would be ongoing and, like any half decent enquiry, you don’t tell suspects you may be onto them through the pages of the world’s media!
March 4th, 2010 at 2:48 pm
Every day that the newspapers can run a story about an obese, scruffy, gypsy-like “abductor” is another day that the McCanns themselves avoid scrutiny.
They absolutely dare not ask for the investigation to be re-opened…they think (and are probably right) that the thick public will forget all this as they are whipped into an anti-PJ frenzy.
March 4th, 2010 at 12:22 pm
She’s more likely to be found in PDL or the surrounding area. Perhaps in the ocean or up in the hills under some rocks. The worldwide campaign simply distracts people from the more likely location of this poor child’s body.
March 4th, 2010 at 9:45 am
…when she is found, either dead or alive….
March 4th, 2010 at 9:34 am
Well now, which is it to be? The globe trotting girl in the clutches of the fat, balding, gypsy, yacht owning paedo who’s treating her like a princess, or, as their own top ex cop private investigator says, held in a lair within ten miles of PDL?
It beggars belief, when will someone put a stop to all this???
March 4th, 2010 at 9:33 am
Can anyone tell me why if “this material is like gold dust” to the McCanns, why are they not confirming their victory and the importance of these sightings on their own web pages? Why are they leaving all of the credit to be taken by the press, when this was the result of the wonderful work done on their behalf by their lawyer?
March 4th, 2010 at 9:21 am
We have been through this all before – just a smoke screen to divert attention
and foster criticism of the Portuguese police
March 4th, 2010 at 8:32 am
Are we going to have to put up with these daily reports now until they’ve reached the end of the list?
Can they not just investigate quietly and let us know when they’ve finished?