Heather Mills V Sara Trumble: Spray Tans On False Limbs, Pictures and Round-Up
HEATHER Mills has been back in a court. No, she’s not seeking Beatles’ royalties under her real name of Penny Lane, allegedly. She’s in Ashford House, Ashford, Kent, to take on her former £260-a-week nanny Sara Trumble who is seeking compensation for alleged sex discrimination and unfair dismissal. Ms Trumble, of Westfield, East Sussex, also alleges she suffered changes to her employment terms following her maternity leave.
Mills’ biggest crime in the media’s eyes, of course, is to have shagged an ageing Ex-Beatle, married him and divorced him, taking with her lots of cash. In the meantime she gave great copy and a few saucy photos to boot.
The paper’s review a case pending a result:
One of the nanny’s allegations is that Mills forced her to give her “naked spray-tans”… If these naked spray-tans did indeed take place, did the nanny have to spray Mills’s prosthetic leg too? Or does Mills own a set of alternative prosthetic legs in a range of different shades, which she chops and changes according to the precise colour of her tan? – Michael Deacon
Or does the spray tan match the leg finish?
The Sun: “Mucca ordered staff to flatter her.”
“I was phoned and asked to go into work and give a quick interview. There was a cameraman and a monitor man with a microphone and I was told to say how wonderful Heather was. The interview was orchestrated entirely by Heather. I had no choice but to take part.”
The Mail hears Trumble say:
‘Heather can be very generous but there was also a distrustable (sic) and unpleasant side of her… I do believe that Heather is more than capable of lying and getting others to lie for her.’
The case continues…
April 3rd, 2010 at 4:35 pm
Mills has no chance of winning this, the employment legislation favour the employees someone has badly advised her if she’s trying to win this.
March 30th, 2010 at 4:24 pm
I like her ‘coldness’.
March 30th, 2010 at 3:47 pm
Dairy, the logical conclusion I come to is the public is swayed in their negativie views of her by taking as bible everything they read in the reputation shredders about her. They’ve feasted on her for many years, exposing her younger past once she left their Saint Paul (doesn’t everyone have a past on way or the other); called her a gold digger asking for millions from Saint Paul (I’ve noticed there are other gold diggers over there with reading the ongoing news and no one seems to condemn them); compare her to his first wife, which is quite unfair to do; judge her her seemingly on a ‘cold look’ about her, yet not all women have a warm look about them but you can’t judge a person by their looks as what they are truly like inside. She certainly seems to be a devoted mother or doesn’t that count when one is determined to judge a person negatively.
What I have noted is no one has even looked askance as Saint Paul’s ongoing romance. That romance happens to be with a woman, who she and her husband were close friends with Paul and his first wife. I do believe that she left her husband after Paul and Heather split. Nothing questionable about that?
March 30th, 2010 at 2:49 pm
Lynn – Tell us more. The media do love to go for her.
Perhaps you can provide another view..?
March 30th, 2010 at 2:24 pm
it’s nice to hear a positive view for a change, Lynn – it just seems a shame that she seems completely unable to put that side of her over….
March 30th, 2010 at 1:52 pm
I worked for Heather for a short time, and she treated me perfectly. I saw how certain younger members of staff took Heather for granted when she wasnt present. Heather would have a field day if she knew how some staff behaved behind her back. They only work for Heather in hope of fame.
March 30th, 2010 at 7:51 am
she has a very unfortunate manner – a coldness that doesn’t attract people to her at all… that, coupled with the divorce money and the fact that she married a Beatle (stupid though that may seem) have seen to it that she now engenders negative publicity whatever she does. Even on Dancing On Ice, she came over as cold and aloof, despite her obvious achievement in ice skating with a prosthetic limb.
it’s strange that even that disability doesn’t seem to be able to win her much sympathy, so the logical conclusion is that maybe she actually isn’t a very nice person…?
March 30th, 2010 at 1:35 am
HEATHER MILLS IS BLOODY FANTASTIC!
March 30th, 2010 at 12:06 am
Heather Mills has certainly made a name for herself in recent years. Unfortunately,
the long and winding road of Heather’s life has usually brought a mountain of negative news from a variety of people who had close contact with her. These latest allegations by a former employee won’t surprise too many people because many people are surprised that anyone would want to take on a job where Heather paid their wages.
Heather has tried hard to win over the public since her divorce from Beatle Paul. She has got publicity on TV shows, open her own restuarant and done her ‘best’ to be more popular. She can change her hairstyle, make-up, clothes, and put on her best smile for the photographers but she CAN’T really change too much as a person. McCartney made a mistake when putting a ring on her finger, and staff working for her have apparently discovered that leopards don’t change their spots. No job or money is worth it when your life becomes unhappy because of another person’s personality and behaviour.All that glitters REALLY isn’t gold.