Karen Owen’s Duke University Fuck List In Full With Photos (NSFW): When Feminism Bites Back
KAREN Owen is the girl who turned the tables on the guys’ locker room chat by producing a “FUCK LIST” of her sex life with the sportsmen of Duke University, USA.
In tabloid tales the women are always reduced to numbers: Tiger Woods 8th woman; Wayne Rooney’s second tarts; and so on. Karen Owen at least used names.
The list was made public over the web Owen emailed it to friends.
Presented as a PowerPoint, Owen’s evaluations take into account penis-size, aural sex and methods. It makes for a great read, although if you are one of the lacrosse, baseball, and tennis players rate on the list your score may temper your reaction.
Says Owen:
“I regret it with all my heart. I would never intentionally hurt the people that are mentioned on that.”
So says the woman dubbed Tigress Woods. Here goes:





April 17th, 2012 at 8:28 pm
I think the political issues going on in todays society are very serious and I would like to reach out to help the starving children in africa. also the way britney spears presents herself is unbelievable. Karen owen is like regina george and gretchen wieners. fetch is not going to happen. amen. peace be with you all.
October 31st, 2010 at 8:08 pm
I think what the problem may be is years ago women were discreet and had more morals and didn’t talk about – or should I say brag about – the number of men they may have slept with, least of all tell their names.
In this modern age, it appears that sex is shared much freer by both men and women. Also, the modern people appear to forget that AIDS is deadly and Herpes is forever!
October 31st, 2010 at 3:41 pm
People who are not good looking need to stop being so bitter. This woman slept with very good looking men. These guys are hotties. The men commenting on here wish they were good looking and could sleep with 13 very good looking women.
To all the old guys, ugly guys, fat guys, hairy guys and guys at inferior schools, or graduates of inferior schools, stop hating.
October 26th, 2010 at 5:14 am
I find this research and report incredibly entertaining. For the guys with high marks…I doubt they are complaining about this. On the other hand, the guys with low marks or mention of their small member, I am sure this is pretty humiliating. But to call her “Tigress Woods” is completely unfair. I agree with another poster: 13 guys in 4 years is not that many guys for a single, non-attached women (3-4 guys a year is about average), but the number of women Tiger was with, while he was MARRIED, is a helluva lot. Also, she was single, not attached and has no children. A HUGE difference between her and Tiger, who was married and has kids. He CHEATED on his wife and continuously lied about it. Again, completely inappropriate to call her Tigress.
October 22nd, 2010 at 3:52 pm
Interesting that a student at the prestigious Duke University who has now been offered this sweet writing deal can’t even tell the difference between when to use “me” and “I” and doesn’t know how to punctuate quotation marks. Forget what her parents must think of her. How about her English professor?
October 11th, 2010 at 7:23 pm
Another disgusting observation, besides the fact that this chick has no class, is the fact that she can’t even spell simple words. Duke university is suppose to be a highly academic college and this skank can’t even spell? Mommy and daddy must have contributed some big money to get her in there.
October 9th, 2010 at 12:34 am
I went on the Duke website and found 8 of the players name and picture ID. For God sake she posted pictures of their jersey numbers. They not only played Lacross or Baseball, they played together on the same team and you can’t tell me they wasn’t passing her around. They knew she was the campus slut. They had too. Most of the time they were in the same building and room the guy was before them. None of them pursued a relationship with her meaning they knew all about her from the get go. She should be hiding, the jokes on her.
October 8th, 2010 at 7:59 pm
Somewhat like Cheryl, above, I think the actual incident falls into the same category as similar stunts by boorish young men: poor judgment, an unfair outing of one’s sex partners without their consent, and momentary embarrassment for the author. And 13 is a little on the high side but still well within the normal range of partners over four years for both college-age men and women. So no big deal there, and anyone who thinks this makes her a “slut” needs to get out more often.
What I don’t get is how this is supposed to represent “feminism biting back.” At best feminism has created an environment where women can be sexually active, let alone admit it, fear of being stoned to death in the village square. At best feminism has created an environment where women can be financially, legally, socially, and politically independent enough not to lock down their laps (like that’s any easier women than it would be for men) until one guy offers to shoulder her complete financial dependence. But that’s just the environment we feminism has helped create — but inside that environment her actions themselves don’t seem either particularly feminist or non-feminist.
Otherwise it just sounds like minus the blow up 14 Duke students, one young woman and 13 young men, had some very enjoyable experiences in college. Without feminism it might only have been 2, with 12 others left wishing it could have been them… or maybe even never knowing what they’d missed at all… or, in the bad-old days before feminism, they’d have found “outlets” in one of the illegal brothels that once could be found on the “wrong side of the tracks” in nearly all college towns. Including Duke. All in all I think those options would bite worse than this.
figleaf
October 7th, 2010 at 9:41 pm
Well if all else fails, she could always write articles for Mayfair.
October 7th, 2010 at 5:09 pm
I kept wondering if her pussy smelled bad. Did she go bareback? I love a woman who acts like a slut. I like to watch.
Chance, the Gardener
October 6th, 2010 at 10:54 am
that’s right – and we’ve all seen the Porkies films….
I didn’t think there were any selection criteria other than the right physical bits and a pulse….? after all, you wouldn’t want to stretch that single cell, now would you…?
October 6th, 2010 at 10:43 am
I thought the selection criteria for all college athletes in the US was to sleep with all the ones who said ‘Yes’. Plus the ones who didn’t say ‘No’ very loudly.
October 6th, 2010 at 9:49 am
…obviously not, by the length of the list…..
October 6th, 2010 at 9:43 am
sounds like a slut looking for attention. this is why us college athletes know which girls to sleep with, and which ones not to sleep with.
October 5th, 2010 at 12:27 pm
This is humorous. Most sports jocks in college do think they are the cocks of the walk and brag of their conquests. However, where did the days go to when ‘nice girls were discreet’.
October 4th, 2010 at 1:39 pm
I bet there are a few shrinking violets after reading this lot….
October 4th, 2010 at 1:12 pm
Bananas in their ears?
October 4th, 2010 at 12:43 pm
Aural Sex? That sounds good