Linda Norgrove: What Really Happened To The Killed British Aid Worker
LINDA Norgrove: the 36-year-old British aid worker captured by the Taliban died in failed rescue attempt. She was being held in Afghanistan’s Korengal Valley when US special forces launched their raid. She had been held for 13 days. She was working for a US aid agency called Development Alternatives. Over 150 US Navy Seals went in. Linda Norgrove was an important figure.
And then..? The story goes that she was either killed by a grenade thrown into the compound by the US forces or a kidnapper detonating a suicide vest.
What happened?
Says David Cameron
“It’s a judgment, it’s a balance. I will go over in my own mind 100 times whether it was the right decision, but I believe it was.”
The Tabloid Agenda
Says the Mirror:
“We do not for a second doubt the anguish of the Prime Minister, who supported a rescue attempt because he was told the British aid worker’s life was in serious danger.”
Well, only a nutter with an agenda would call Cameron a liar. But good of the anti-Cameron Mirror to suggest Cameron is a liar and then dismiss the claim. Nice.
And further to the Left on the pages of the World Socialist Worker:
Cameron’s statement points to a deliberate cover-up by the Pentagon, with the aid of the US puppet regime in Afghanistan. The only question unanswered is whether the British government was also in the know from the start, or was, in the words of the Telegraph, treated “like an ill-informed and gullible patsy by our chief allies in the world”. The first scenario is the more likely.
The Soldier: Colonel Richard Kemp
* Whether she was killed by a Taliban suicide vest or a US grenade, Linda Norgrove died because extremist killers seized her with the intention of exploiting her for propaganda then butchering her.
Or as he said one day earlier:
* The outcome of Linda Norgrove’s kidnapping has been a tragedy. The heartless killing of this defenceless aid-worker is entirely in keeping with the Taliban’s normal callous brutality.
Shoot first. Questions later.
* There are directly contradictory accounts of what, in the meantime, was going on behind the scenes. The Foreign Secretary William Hague said yesterday that “from the start” the British government was gravely concerned that Ms Norgrove had been taken by a vicious Salafist group who would pass her on up the terrorist chain of command. But Afghan officials claimed that they were in the process of obtaining her release through a group of local elders when the raid took place. Others maintained that the abductors were not hardcore Taliban but a criminal gang which was seeking a substantial ransom and had let this be known to British diplomats.
Why They Went In
* It was decided, finally, that the threat to Linda’s life from her captors was at least equal to the threat to her life if highly-trained soldiers, armed with the element of surprise, attempted to free her by force. Had the attempt succeeded, we would all be marvelling at the skill and courage of the liberating forces. It failed and we are now asking questions about the wisdom of the rescue attempt.
The Raid
* The Seals then sprinted to the building where Miss Norgrove was being held, as 150 other U.S. troops surrounded the compound.
Overhead, Predator drones and Apache attack helicopters hovered, ready to provide air support. But the Taliban were not prepared to give up their prize lightly.Using Colt M4A1 automatic rifles and grenades, five Navy Seals were engaged in a vicious fire-fight as they attempted to get to the hostage. She was being guarded by at least eight terrorists.
Despite the fierce Taliban resistance, the Seals managed to fight their way towards the Miss Norgrove’s building. And then, with six Taliban gunmen already dead, one of the Seals threw a grenade through the door.
The First Statement
The UN statements said Miss Norgrove died “seconds before rescuers arrived. [US Forces] had entered the compound … [but] an insurgent detonated an explosive device that was attached to his person. He was in close enough proximity to Miss Norgrove. She was wounded.”
Simon Hoggart
The prime minister didn’t want to blame anybody. He praised the Americans for their courage. They had, he said, “treated her as if she were a US citizen”, which perhaps sounded more ironic than he intended. The inquiry would be conducted jointly by the US and the UK, which we took as code for saying “we’ll make sure that there isn’t an American cover-up”.
The Nobel American
Last night, US Navy Captain Gary Kirchner – a Nato spokesman in Kabul – said the commander of the Special Operations troops involved in the rescue attempt had reviewed video footage from a helmet camera on Monday morning.
He said the commander had “discovered what appeared to be, looked to him, like someone throwing a hand grenade into the area where Miss Norgrove was being held”.
He then called the American commander of Nato forces in Afghanistan, General David Petraeus.
Kirchner added: “The bottom line here is that when the commander saw that, he knew that there were some discrepancies and immediately wanted to make sure that we did the right thing.”
The inquiry to come…
Posted: 12th, October 2010 | In: Key Posts, News Comments (15) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink





















































October 13th, 2010 at 9:24 pm
I understand, Clive. It is just that I’ve always had a soft spot in my heart and respect for our soldiers – and the UK’s also, by the way!
October 13th, 2010 at 7:59 pm
Cheryl
I have no wish to cast aspersions on the bravery of US forces as individuals, just their competence or maybe that of their officers.
When I lived in the States, my best pal was a Vietnamese who had been a pilot in a helicopter battleship, seconded to USAAF. He told me many tales of the
problems the US pilots caused to themselves and their allies. I also got similar tales from a US pilot friend stationed at Moffat Field and again from an SAS mate here in UK.
Maybe I have a slanted view and influenced by UK press which does focus on
friendly fire incidents when UK or NATO troops involved as victims.
It was a tragedy that this young lady, Scottish like myself, was killed even if the intentions were good.
Time for me to move on.
October 13th, 2010 at 6:02 pm
I thought the Russians won WWII. We just kept the second team busy while they got on with it
October 13th, 2010 at 5:12 pm
Your humor is not amusing, Yampster.. Next you’ll be saying we sat on our arses over here and your country won WWII all alone!
October 13th, 2010 at 5:04 pm
Clive, when it was JOINTLY decided that the US would attempt her rescue we didn’t just send in soldiers we sent in our Special Forces. Our Special Forces are the elite and those soldiers picked to be in Special Forces are sent to special operation centers to be schooled and take courses to be specifically trained for special missions where needed.
My brother served in Special Forces in the Vietnam War, as did my cousin. He has many medals for his bravery in doing close to the impossible in missions back then.
You want to knock my Government go right ahead as I often do also. But do not knock our soldiers who often put their lives on the line to try to save another. And yes, accidents do happen in attempts to save lives and they never forget that, as their goal is to succeed not to fail.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_special_operations_forces#General
October 13th, 2010 at 4:59 pm
Come on Clive, we’ve made as many errors as any other force in a war zone. Check out ALL the friendly fire incidents, percentage wise we’ve been responsible for as many as the US…… The Brits are not the superior armed forces of the world.
IMO all credit to the US forces who made the attempt in those circumstances.
October 13th, 2010 at 4:50 pm
It says ‘British troops turned up too late’. I can only assume that they asked the Americans to give them a lift in one of their many helicopters and they never turned up or flew into a sandstorm.
October 13th, 2010 at 4:37 pm
…but the hostages survived.
October 13th, 2010 at 4:28 pm
That is true, Yampster, that was a failure.
Explain this one to me, please!
http://current.com/news/91853718_british-troops-tried-to-rescue-hostages-at-iran-border.htm
October 13th, 2010 at 10:12 am
Sorry if I upset you Cheryl but I stand by my comments only I do not have time to look up and highlight the many incidents, from Vietnam to today which exist.
I agree the operation was sanctioned with UK PM involvement but that does not make it right.
Unfortunately while most American servicemen are as brave as any others, they
share the typical US characteristic of childish exuberance and sorry, plain dumbness,into battle.
I am not anti-American in any way, just the opposite but I do recognise their failings.
October 13th, 2010 at 8:47 am
considering she was a civilian British Aid Worker in a war zone by choice I think we should not denigrate those US soliders who put their own lives on the line to try and rescue her. They didn’t have to even try……..
As June said, rescue attempts often go wrong. Life isn’t perfect and casualties of war come in all guises.
October 12th, 2010 at 11:42 pm
1) Tehran, Iran on 24/04/1980………..in my pants
.
The mother of all rescue missions
October 12th, 2010 at 11:00 pm
Clive, the US did NOT make that decision to try and rescue her all by themselves.
“Cameron strongly defended the mission itself, saying it had been agreed upon after intense consideration and exchanges between British and American officials. He said a green light was given because Norgrove was in serious danger, being held by Taliban fighters in a remote mountain valley of Konar province in eastern Afghanistan.” That is an excerpt from the Washington Post story.
As for the American forces being notorious for botched rescue operations – list them please to back-up that statement.
Don’t start slinging shite at the US forces or I’ll start slinging shite back.
October 12th, 2010 at 10:54 am
American forces are notorious for botched rescue operations and causing so-called friendly fire incidents. I can not think of any successful operations, at least in the public sphere. It is probably safer to be the enenemy of America than its ally.
It is a tremendous pity the SAS or SBS were not used on this occassion.
October 12th, 2010 at 10:07 am
Sadly, rescue attempts do go wrong, apart from in the Wonderful World of Hollywood.
I think this is being turned into an ‘international incident’ and blame being apportioned.
It was the Taliban who seized her – there’s the blame.
Or the Western world for the invasion of Afghanistan, but not the people who tried the rescue