Anorak

Anorak | Sarah Palin Learnt About The Blood Libel From The New York Times’s Blacks

Sarah Palin Learnt About The Blood Libel From The New York Times’s Blacks

by | 14th, January 2011

SARAH Palin is implicated in the murders of six people and the shooting of 14 more  by a nutzoid press reacting to nutzoid Jared Loughner . Obama puts his gun away to take nutzoid  praise for rising above the partisan politics.

Palin wasn’t to blame. But she reacts to the barage of criticism by saying:

Especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible.”

Michael Tomasky writes:

Okay, I guess I have to do this, but I’ll keep it short. I think she probably didn’t fully know what “blood libel” means, historically and culturally.

Peter Stanford writes:

The real question is, did she have any idea what the phrase actually meant and therefore of the offence it might – and has – caused?

Stanford illustrates what an idiot he thinks Palin is by quoting a couple of her gaffes. But he forgets to mention Obama’s gun nor the President’s note that there are 57 States

You have already read 1 premium article for free today
Access immediately the premium content with Multipass

Or come back tomorrow



Posted: 14th, January 2011 | In: Key Posts, Politicians Comment | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink