San Francisco’s Foreskin Man Super Queero Wants To Outlaw Jews And Circumcision
TO San Francisco, where Foreskin Man aims to win hearts, minds and future penises of America by campaigning for foreskins. And do not doubt that this is a big issue. This November San Francisco locals will be able to vote on a proposal to ban circumcision for the under 18s.
Muslims and Jews would, in effect, be outlawed.
Lloyd Schofield is a leading light in the pro-foreskin movement, namely the San Francisco Male Genital Mutilation bill. Says the “intactivists”:
“Parents are really guardians, and guardians have to do what’s in the best interest of the child. It’s his body. It’s his choice.”
But he is not Foreskin Man. Matthew Hess knows who Foreskin Man is. Hess channels Foreskin Man through his pen and crayons. Hess is not only the artist behind foreskin Man, he is the founder of San Diego group, MGM Bill (male genital mutilation). Says he:
“A lot of people have said that, but we’re not trying to be anti-Semitic. We’re trying to be pro-human rights.”
It’s just a dumb coincidence that Foreskin man (blonde, blue eyes, devoid of cunning) is fighting Monster Mohel (a leering Jew in black garb who wants your kids). Hess is not “trying” to be anti-Semitic. He just got lucky…
June 13th, 2011 at 3:05 pm
it’s about time people woke up to the fact that “traditional” does not automatically mean either “good” or “acceptable”….
June 13th, 2011 at 2:05 pm
Sorry but past crimes against humanity don’t excuse current ones. I’m very sensitive to the harms that were done to the Jews but I’m even more sensitive to the current ones that are being done to innocent baby boys on a daily basis. There was an African woman (living in the USA) a few years ago who sliced two superficial scars in the cheeks of her son as was customary to her African tribal religion. The Judge who charged her didn’t care that her religion was the motivating factor, she was still not pardoned for harming the body of her son. Muslims are not permitted to remove the foreskin from their baby girl’s genitals or even pin prick the genitals of their daughters as customary to their religion. Many, many Jewish people are against this horrific tradition and they themselves attest to the barbarism (just watch one). The old testament is filled with many barbaric traditions that are simply not legal in modern day because we have a good understanding of bodily integrity as a basic human right. Traditions are wonderful and cultural heritage is wonderful and I encourage everyone to take pride in their culture, however, traditions that infringe upon the body of a minor are not acceptable no matter what history has told. If we allow this then we allow the pain and suffering to continue and, in essence, Hitler wins because for his hideous crimes we are pardoning others. Baby boys need not suffer and lose ownership to an integral part of their sex organ to be welcomed into this world and into a Jewish (or non-Jewish) home. A bris shalom, ceremony without the cutting, is what is performed on baby girls born to Jewish families and can also be afforded to boys. Many Jewish families are opting for a Bris Shalom for a truly beautiful welcoming ceremony that doesn’t involve genital mutilation. And remember Judaism is a culture and religion, no child is born Jewish. Children are born to Jewish families and whether they want to be Jewish is up to them to decide when they reach an age in which it is appropriate to do so. Even more of a compelling reason not to brand their bodies with a religion that they are yet to decide if they want to be part of.
June 13th, 2011 at 8:17 am
“Muslims and Jews would, in effect, be outlawed.”
Um, no actually. CIRCUMCISION would be outlawed. It wouldn’t forbid anyone from choosing their religion. Please dispense with the hyperbole.
June 7th, 2011 at 2:33 am
I think it may have been well planned out using the allusion of anti-Semetism being equated to anti infant circumcision. Lots of air time. If anti infant circumcision equates to anti semetism , that would imply that the covenant law was with a false heavenly godfather, then there would be no chosen race, then there would be no need for the messiah of the chosen race, then there would be no need for the anti-christ/anti-semetic, then there would be no religion. Just think. No more need for genocides, Jehads, Halocasts,9/11′s, mass murder/suicides,ethnic cleancing. All the paranoid delusions caused before we knew of the exsistance of micro organisms, gone. The benefits of an education on the functions, care and use of the male and female prepuce could replace the benefits, risks, and harms of circumcisions and excisions.
June 6th, 2011 at 12:52 am
It’s unfortunate that the first couple issues of this comic book chose to focus first on Jewish circumcision, since most American circumcision (like 99%) is done by doctors, with no blessings and such. And around the world 2/3 of cut males are Muslims, although a good share of them are cut at an age when they could weigh in on the matter.
But let’s not lose sight of the issue. Foreskin amputation is the mutilation of a healthy normal boy’s sexual organ. That sounds like something Mengele would have boasted about on his resume.
The barbaric penile blood sucking depicted in the comic DOES go on. It’s an orthdox ritual called metzizah b’peh, and babies have contracted STDs from adults and even died as a result. Oddly, the present head of the CDC, Thomas Frieden, had a chance when running the NYC health department to regulate the practice after some infant deaths, but he said he thought the community could self-police.
So that’s why the proposed law is needed. People in power refuse to protect infants. I had a right to keep my whole body, but the law failed to protect me.
Foreskin feels REALLY good. HIS body, HIS decision.