Anorak | Why We Won The War In Libya: Gaddafi Had Neither Soldiers Nor Power

Why We Won The War In Libya: Gaddafi Had Neither Soldiers Nor Power

by | 30th, August 2011

HOW did we win the war in Libya? Oh, yes, it was us the West Wot Won It. Or was it the rebels? Or was Gaddafi defeated because get this there was nothing to defeat? His regime was knackered.

Bernard-Henri Lévy tells the Daily Beast :

But either the news of the arrival of foreigners travels fast, or the excitement of the chebabs escorting us, who are also shooting bi-tube rounds in our honor, attracts attention; people start flooding into the square, more and more of them, brandishing their weapons toward the sky and joining in the scene. I improvise a few words: “A great day…the beauty of the liberation of a city by its own…images of the liberation of Paris…Libya in your hands…no exactions, nor vengeance….”

The young people cry “Allah Akbar”—I reply, “Libya Hora.”

They cheer for France, I salute the Libyan spring…

In the same organ, John Barry assures us that America won it:

The U.S. military has spent about $1 billion so far and played a far larger role inLibya than it has acknowledged, quietly implementing an emerging “covert intervention” strategy that the Obama administration hopes will let America fight small wars with a barely detectable footprint.

It was Nato yep, Nato plotted the entire thing :

British and Nato military commanders are planning what they hope will be a final onslaught on Colonel Gaddafi’s forces to put an end to all resistance from troops loyal to the Libyan leader.

One thing for certain, it wasn’t the Germans. As Liam Fox told us:

“Far too many of our European partners are still trying to get a free ride and they should regard Libya as a wake-up call.”

It was human intervention, says David Owen :

During the darkest moments of Nato’s campaign in Libya, it was suggested that its sluggish progress represented the death knell for the doctrine of humanitarian intervention – that a West chastened by its experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan and enfeebled by debt lacked the money, the morale and the military resources to take action against those who broke international law. Now that the rebels have swept into Tripoli, the opposite argument is being made – that their success represents a vindication of the Nato strategy, and provides a template for the toppling of despots in Syria and elsewhere.

But hold on a moment… was it Gaddafis own regime that disintegrated? The BBC reports:

As Tripoli was surrounded from three sides – east, south and west – government forces precipitously collapsed. What at first might have been mistaken for a tactical withdrawal into urban areas, emerged more clearly as the disintegration of the government’s most feared fighting units. The vaunted Khamis Brigade – commanded by a son of Col Gaddafi – saw its barracks raided with impunity. Rebel convoys punched deep into Tripoli, meeting virtually no resistance.

Shashank Joshi gives three yep, just three reasons why the elite fighres weren’t fighting:

You have already read 1 premium article for free today
Access immediately the premium content with Multipass

Or come back tomorrow

Posted: 30th, August 2011 | In: Politicians Comment | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink