Anorak

Anorak | Campaigns To Get Cultural Institutions To Say No To Big Oil Money Tarnishes The Arts

Campaigns To Get Cultural Institutions To Say No To Big Oil Money Tarnishes The Arts

by | 5th, December 2011

A TOP TATE galleries official has sided with critics of the organisation’s sponsorship deal with BP, saying “When activists protest at, for example, events like the Tate summer party, that is a thoroughly good thing. It allows me to say: BP is a disgrace.”

The Independent reports that the official, Patrick Brill, who goes by the pseudonym Bob and Roberta Smith, is cited in a new publication issued by campaign groups Liberate Tate, Art Not Oil and Platform. Brill is one of 13 trustees who oversees the Tate galleries’ acquisitions and strategies. So his support for activists who oppose the acceptance of ‘oil money’ is a political victory of sorts for those activists.

The 2010 summer party Brill referred to in the report made headlines after a group of black-clad, Liberate Tate activists crashed it, pouring buckets of molasses over the party entrance. This was in protest against the party sponsor BP’s ventures, like its oil sands project in Canada, and its actions in the aftermath of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Other groups have staged similar interventions and happenings since.

Campaigns to get arts institutions to stop accepting funding from big businesses are based on a view that such money corrupts art organisations and allows Evil Corporations to pose as worthy institutions. In truth, artists and cultural institutions have always relied on funding from individuals and organisations whose agendas or outlooks some might find unsavoury from wealthy elites and royals to state bodies and religious institutions.

Furthermore, if activist groups like those behind the new publication, Not If But When: Culture Beyond Oil , have their way the cultural output of Britain would be so much poorer. After all, BP alone spends over £1million a year sponsoring major UK arts institutions, such as the Royal Opera House, the British Museum, the National Portrait Gallery, the Almeida theatre and the Science and Natural History Museums. An end to corporate funding would also turn art into more of an elite pursuit of the few as arts institutions would have a hard time keeping their doors open for free.

Chris Sands of Liberate Tate posited that, considering 8,000 Tate members and visitors have signed a

You have already read 1 premium article for free today
Access immediately the premium content with Multipass

Or come back tomorrow



Posted: 5th, December 2011 | In: Key Posts, News Comment (1) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink