Kim Kardashian talks but her great big hipsy wedding ‘fraud’
KIM Kardashian was on the David Letterman Show to talk up Kim & Kourtney Take Miami, the show in which (spoiler alert) neat, easy-wipe clean Kim hunts for a swimming pool to match her bikini as Kourtney keeps her kompany on a kazoo. They do not make a sex tape. They do not get married. Those two events bulge on Kim’s celebrity CV like her buttocks in a windsock.
You will recall, no doubt, that Kim married a huge kebab / basketball player named Kris Humphries in a lucrative TV deal. The marriage lasted 72 days. She then exited stage right. He sued. Letterman wants to know when Kim, pregnant by Kanye West, is to be divorced?
Kim: “Well, I’m trying, and it’s a process and I’ve been trying for almost two years now, to um, to wrap it up, but it’s, you know, it’s hard.”
DL: “I guess it’s none of my business, but what does he want? Does he want his own show?”…
DL: “Now again you don’t have to do this, but when the divorce comes through, and he wants an annulment, is that right? Why an annulment, what’s the difference?”
Kim: “I don’t really know cause even if we got an annulment… I would love to give him one but then that would make…the only legal way to get an annulment is if fraud were involved, so that’s what tricky. So he is suing me for an annulment based on the fact that I frauded him into marrying him for publicity.”
DL: “So he’s claiming that he was the victim of fraud?”
Kim: “Yes, well, that’s the only way to get an annulment is if one person was frauded, so that was the case.”
DL: “But fraud was not a factor here, is that right?”
Kim: “Not in my case, no.”
And then the sister pipes up:
Kourtney: “I think if she was going to do it for publicity, she’s pick someone that people knew.”
Sack the casting director!