The Onion had no need to apologise for calling Quvenzhane Wallis a c*nt
THE Onion called 9-year-old Best Actress Oscar nominee Quvenzhane Wallis a c*nt. The Onion tweeted:
Everyone else seems afraid to say it, but that Quvenzhané Wallis is kind of a c*nt, right? #Oscars2013
Actor Wendell Pierce responded:
“Identify the writer. Let him defend that abhorrent verbal attack of a child. You call it humor I call it horrendous.”
John Jones wrote:
“Comedians usually stick to their guns, right or wrong. Pretty telling that the Onion pulled their tweet about young Quvenzhane Wallis…”
Elizabeth Hawksworth bizarrely said it was about race:
“Quvenzhane Wallis is a nine year old woman of colour. Let’s let what @TheOnion did sink in and remember that Dakota Fanning never had this.”
You can project your own agenda onto the offensive. And it is offensive. It is also painfully unfunny.
After the Twitter frenzy, The Onion duly apologises:
Dear Readers,
On behalf of The Onion, I offer my personal apology to Quvenzhané Wallis and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences for the tweet that was circulated last night during the Oscars. It was crude and offensive—not to mention inconsistent with The Onion’s commitment to parody and satire, however biting.
No person should be subjected to such a senseless, humorless comment masquerading as satire.
The tweet was taken down within an hour of publication. We have instituted new and tighter Twitter procedures to ensure that this kind of mistake does not occur again.
In addition, we are taking immediate steps to discipline those individuals responsible.
Miss Wallis, you are young and talented and deserve better. All of us at The Onion are deeply sorry.
Sincerely,
Steve Hannah
CEO
The Onion
But someone must have laughed at it. It’s shock comedy, or an attempt at it. The Onion’s problem is that it broadcasts to everyone, not just people who buy into sick jokes. It misread the audience.
The other problem is that satire now is rarely controversial.
When it works, satire can damage politicians’ reputations and undermine prejudice and conservative ideas. However, when nobody believes in politicians, state institutions or old-fashioned morality, who are satirists hurting and what effect are they having?
In such conditions simply continuing to poke fun at those in power is not telling anybody anything new, it is just reinforcing cynicism. And judging by what’s on offer, it’s not even funny any more. This is the major problem for satire right now.
Yahoo!’s Greg Hughes makes a point:
“The Onion made a pretty significant faux pas tonight on Quvenzhane Wallis. They deleted the tweet, but the Internet doesn’t ever forget.”
The internet offers a forum but not context.
Australian comic Jim Jeffries outlined the rules of modern comedy:
“You can’t do jokes about black people or Asian people, but you can do a rape joke onstage now and there’s not a problem.”
You pick on aceptable soft targets. Jeffries is not daring or edgy; he’s just pandering to what he thinks will sell tickets.
Was The Onion, in its heavy-handed tweet, mocking these imposed limits of PC speech. Call a very talented, vivacious child the ultimate swear word and show that you do not adhere to the correct etiquette. Say it with feeling, real emotion – like you believe it – and some of the crowd will laugh.
What frightens the outraged is not that The Onion, a funny, sensitive organ, makes the joke, rather that some of its audience will laugh at it. Their patronising view is that audience will not be able to spot The Onion’s Tweet as humour, but will instead see it as a statement of fact.
The only fall out from this is that in the act of censoring the offending tweet, the offended have given grounds for a comic who wants to be edgy to say it again…
Photo: Actress Quvenzhane Wallis eats popcorn in the audience during the Oscars at the Dolby Theatre on Sunday Feb. 24, 2013, in Los Angeles.
The last word is the last word (NSFW):
At the Comedy Store, at the height of political correctness, Jerry Sadowitz won a bet with fellow comics by saying: “Nelson Mandela, what a cunt.” It was only the next night that he thought of a punchline for such an inflamatory comment. “You lend some people a fiver and you never see them again.”
Posted: 26th, February 2013 | In: Celebrities Comments (7) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink





















































February 27th, 2013 at 9:04 am
The schoolkids (a good school an’ all) outside the local shop were freely using the word this morning. The girls just as much as the lads.
(And Shameless was up to scratch last night)
February 26th, 2013 at 9:59 pm
I agree the “humour” is in the shock and the targeting of it towards a child. I simply have never understood why this word gets special treatment by the censors, What does it mean?
Iwant to say too that I dont find it funny at all, boring and attention seeking maybe.
Like everything else in life eventually comedians are scraping the bottom of the barrel for stuff like this or Pistorius stuff, when Billy Connelly started it all it wasnt so offensive but now its got little left to offer.
I was disappointed to see the new version of Yes Prime Minister, written by the original writers, as I was hoping for a return to the days of Morecambe and Wise, Porridge and Some Mothers Do Have Em. These shows had huge audiences back in their day and modern comedy, if not TV, just seems to appeal to humans lower instincts and leaves them wanting more of the same
While everyone who reads The Sun enjoys moaning about the benefit cheats, I bet a lot of them cant wait for the next series of Shameless.
February 26th, 2013 at 1:01 pm
To me, it’s a aggressive misogynistic word and I find it offensive when it’s used as an insult to someone.
February 26th, 2013 at 12:44 pm
The joke seems to be in how inappropriate and over the top the word is.
February 26th, 2013 at 12:20 pm
If they call her fat or the “n” word then you can see the offence, but personally the “c” word has never meant anything in particular so cant see the offence.
Can anyone say what the word implies?
February 26th, 2013 at 12:16 pm
It is. It’s ugly and stupid.
February 26th, 2013 at 12:03 pm
Whatever way you try to justify it as a joke, it’s a horrible thing to say about a little girl. Maybe it’s because I hate the word to start with but to say it about a child isn’t funny at all – just nasty.