Anorak

Anorak | Woolwich jihad: Russell Brand compares and contrasts the Koran and The Catcher in The Rye

Woolwich jihad: Russell Brand compares and contrasts the Koran and The Catcher in The Rye

by | 27th, May 2013

13823719

LIKE you, the Sun knows that when a man is hacked to death as a sacrifice to his alleged killers’ jihadi god, Russell Brand’s view is important. The  murder of Lee Rigby  needs the celebrity angle. Writes Brand:

I caught up with the sad malice in Woolwich and felt compelled to tweet in casual defence of the Muslim community who were being haphazardly condemned by a few people on my time line.

The alleged killer specifically identified himself as Muslim. He also cited the koran. Of course, only a fool believes the worst of any group typifies it. But that does not mean the psycho’s actions should not be confronted and explained.

Brand once went amongst the BNP and nailed them. He adds:

I simply feel that it is important that our reaction is measured.

Measured, how?

There is something about the arbitrary brutality, humdrum High Street setting and the cool rhetoric of the blood-stained murderer that evokes a powerful and inherently irrational response.

The market places in Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan are pretty hum-drum until a jihadi detonates his bomb. But were the 7/7 bombers all mentally ill? What about the 9/11 mass murderers? The alleged Woolwich killers appear to share much with these people  who killed because the voices in their had commanded it. Brand adds:

In my view that man’s severely mentally ill and has found a convenient conduit for his insanity — in this case the Koran.

In the case of another mentally ill and desperate man — Mark Chapman — it was The Catcher In The Rye.

This was the nominated text for his rationalisation of the murder of John Lennon in 1980.

I’ve read that book and I’ve read some of the Koran, and nothing in either of them has compelled me to do violence.

We can’t think of another killer other than Chapman who cited The Catcher In The Rye as his trigger. And the nutcases who cite the Koran as their excuse to kill can be placed in a larger context of religious murder.

Right now in Burma, Buddhists are murdering innocent Muslims. Burma is not facing an Islamist militant threat. The Buddhists’ leader is a monk called Wirathu. He’s nicknamed “the Buddhist Bin Laden”. It’s a nickname name he likes. He comes over as a paranoid bigot, saying:

 “We represent Burma’s 135 ethnic groups. We are urging members of those ethnic groups not to follow the Muslim religion and not to sell anything to Muslims, and that includes paddy fields and houses. The reason is that we have to protect our religion. If we trade with the Muslims, they become rich: many Muslims have grown rich and have built big houses for themselves, and mosques, and slaughterhouses, which are a problem for Buddhism. Muslims are now dominating the Burmese economy.”

This nutcase and his acolytes are cynically using Islam to define their own racist agenda. Wirathu is making similar noises to Lee Rigby’s killers, blaming the victims for being attacked.

Wirathu has his group of bigots. The Woolwich killers seem to have had theirs. Islamist outfit Al-Muhajiroun is reported to have played a part in

You have already read 1 premium article for free today
Access immediately the premium content with Multipass

Or come back tomorrow



Posted: 27th, May 2013 | In: Celebrities Comment (1) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink