Anorak | Free speech: Southampton University’s racist anti-Israel debate must go ahead

Free speech: Southampton University’s racist anti-Israel debate must go ahead

by | 12th, March 2015

International Law and the State of Israel: Legitimacy, Responsibility and Exceptionalism


Southampton University’s debate on the State of Israel is called International Law and the State of Israel . The blurb runs:

This conference will be the first of its kind and constitutes a ground-breaking historical event on the road towards justice and enduring peace in historic Palestine. It is unique because it concerns the legitimacy in International Law of the Jewish state of Israel. Rather than focusing on Israeli actions in the 1967 Occupied Territories, the conference will focus on exploring themes of Legitimacy, Responsibility and Exceptionalism; all of which are posed by Israel’s very nature.

And there you are. It is not about peace or the two-state solution. It’s is about a one-state solution which means making Israel an illegal country. It is a biased and bigotted conference more loaded than George Bush at a frat party. But it should go ahead.

You see, anyone can go and listen, even ‘illegal’ criminal Israelis who are being made stateless and having any claim to land backed by an ancient religious covenant with God, plus the fact of the disapora and all the centuries of pain that came with it outlawed by “leading thinkers”.

It’s all incredibly self-righteous and pompous at Southampton Uni’s anti-Israel get together. And it is not the least bit challenging. It’s a debate inside the safe zone .

Before we get to the content, we pick up on the “ outrage “.

MP Caroline Nokes, MP for Romsey and Southampton North, is quoted in the Express :

“While academic freedom is sacrosanct, it saddens me that Southampton University would potentially bring itself into disrepute by hosting such an apparently one-sided event.”

But that is what they do. Universities are all about hosting one-sided events, whether it’s talking on abortion , banning Blured Lines,   T-shirts , The Sun newspaper , Charlie Hebdo,   pole-dancing  and  the Nietzsche Society , or no-platforming speakers in a refusal to engage with diverse views and a multi-reasoning society.

Banning Zionists and Israel is just part of the trend. And no subject is more guaranteed to excite the censors than a debate on ways to deligitimise Israel. Monstering Israel is the default position for all sensitive student censors.

Cambridge Union Society has debated the motion “Israel is a rogue state” ( followed by jazz and cocktails). That union has not held similar debates on Pakistan (founded in the same years as Israel) nor any other country shaped by the external forces, such as Saudi Arabia, Syria, Jordan, the USA, Australia and so on. What is it about Israel specifically then makes it so worthy of attack? That question to the Jews.

These debates are simply chances to support the authodoxy and to show yourself to be a right-on part of the morally correct group think. A debate on Israel would

You have already read 1 premium article for free today
Access immediately the premium content with Multipass

Or come back tomorrow

Posted: 12th, March 2015 | In: Key Posts, News Comments (3) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink