The stupid restrictions were removed before the Guardian got to court.
Carter-Ruck may have gone that step too far. The Law Society and their Lordships perhaps have more than a little to whisper in their shell-likes re a legal firm’s interpretation of Parliamentary Privilege.
The story as was:
The Guardian has been prevented from reporting parliamentary proceedings on legal grounds which appear to call into question privileges guaranteeing free speech established under the 1688 Bill of Rights.
Today’s published Commons order papers contain a question to be answered by a minister later this week. The Guardian is prevented from identifying the MP who has asked the question, what the question is, which minister might answer it, or where the question is to be found.
Mainstream media versus old school lawyers. New media wins…
Image: the great Matt Buck

























