
Chuck Norris Says No Divorce For Gays
GAY marriage is not allowed in liberal California. Chuck Norris explains:
The truth is that the great majority of Prop. 8 advocates are not bigots or hatemongers. They are American citizens who are following 5,000 years of human history and the belief of every major people and religion: Marriage is a sacred union between a man and a woman. Their pro-Prop. 8 votes weren’t intended to deprive any group of its rights; they were safeguarding their honest convictions regarding the boundaries of marriage.
Defamer explains:
Yes, and Norris respects those boundaries of marriage, which is why he has already been married, divorced, and remarried, and why he has a daughter he didn’t meet until she turned 26 because she was the result of an extramarital affair. Chuck, Chuck, Chuck: gay people want to have that too! How can you be so unfair to deprive two people who love each other the privilege of ruining marriage from the inside?
No you can’t…
Posted: 19th, November 2008 | In: Anorak in America Comments (9) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





March 30th, 2009 at 7:23 pm
Google chuck norris and click the i’m feeling lucky option. Damn funny stuff
March 30th, 2009 at 6:18 pm
Concerning Chuck Norris, whom I met decades ago. First, terrible picture of him, but it was chosen for effect. Well done publisher. I know only this fact. We are all human and make mistakes as we live this life, learn and grow, hopefully learning from them. No one is dirt free ok? There are references in the Bible, in fact many bibles that speak against the Gay lifestyle or rather sexual orientation. That is not for me to judge nor condemn. I think God, and enough people have done that already. Jesus taught to forgive and make whole. His most famous line was “Go and sin no more.” He didn’t condemn, yell, publish papers. He didn’t speak bad or rail against anyone but the religious crowd. Chuck Norris spoke his mind and it is the mind of the mass majority of us in S. Cal and in fact the world. (Try to be gay in Islam) If someone wants to live that lifestyle that is their choice, but it should not be forced on the rest of us by passing laws. (My opinion and I am allowed that.) Already we are forced, like it or not to at times break our own moral convictions to make allowances for this lifestyle and that we can not discriminate against it in anyway. Even if for some people it is repulsive, they must allow it, endure it, so we don’t hurt others feelings or now violate their civil rights, even at the loss of our own civil rights. Hey gays, do your thing as you will, enjoy your lifestyle as you will, but don’t force us to give you ’special rights’ the rest of us do not have just because of your sexual orientation. I have a few gay friends and they are wonderful people. They know where I stand and still they are still my friends. We agree to disagree on some things. I chose to live my life straight with a most wonderful wife. I am happy, they are happy and don’t need laws to make them more so. Laws can not make you happy. Only you can make you happy. I’m with Chuck thank you.
March 30th, 2009 at 5:47 am
Good for you Chuck for standing up for what you believe and for exercizing YOUR ENALIENABLE RIGHT TO VOTE AND CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION. These cowards will insult you personally and make fun of your acting or marital history, however, they can’t take away your right to protect something you feel right about. Only the activists try to push that “pro 8hater” mentality. We the people know that prop 8 was not anti-Gay, it was pro marriage. The Gay community has all the rights Californians can offer, it is up to the Federal Government to step up.
Hey Chuck, go beat up Gavin Newsome before he turns our State into something we dont recognize.
March 30th, 2009 at 5:04 am
Way To Go, Chuck Norris!
Poligamy has been around for a long long time. (And yes, Joseph Smith had multiple wives.) If you need proof of how long it’s been around, just read the Old Testament. Christians believe Abraham and Jacob went to heaven, even though the Old Testamant records that they practiced poligamy (which itself was never universally practiced, but only practiced by a selected few who were sanctioned by the Lord). Poligamy hasn’t been “stamped” out either. It’s practice was discontinued for a time by the Mormons, but not disavowed. It is still their doctrine, but any unsanctioned poligamous relationships have always been punished. (Multiple incidents are recorded in both the Old and New Testament where God’s people were not allowed to practice all of their beliefs due to persecution. Such was the case in 169 BC, where Antiochus forbade Jewish worship rituals under the Mosaic Law such as sabbath observance, circumcision, temple worship, etc. The repression of religious practice was certainly not an indicator of falseness of the doctrine then, nor does that repression signify any error today.)
Poligamy, in contrast with homosexuality, is about raising families. Homosexuals will never be able to naturally procreate. It’s ironic that they claim nature has made them this way, and yet they seek unnatural means to have children. The only natural fruit they can bear is bitterness.
Many natural tendencies are bad for society, such as selfishness and anger. I know people with homosexual temptations and no attraction to the opposite sex who have successfully overcome their weaknesses just like people have overcome their selfish tendencies. Some people have decided they were gay late in life, after starting a family with an opposite gender spouse. This has gone both ways, where people with gay tendencies have later decided they no longer wanted to be gay, yet the gay ‘community’ would have people believe that it is not a choice (they have very rigid definitions of what it means to be gay- maybe they should get outside of their gay box). Evidence reveals this is simply not the case, unless your google is broken.
March 29th, 2009 at 11:26 pm
Chuck Norris? Is he not gay also. From last recall, I think he is. Even gay people can have children. Married or not.
March 29th, 2009 at 6:01 pm
Chuck Norris?
A Z list actor? If you can even call what he does “acting”
Does anyone even care what this man has to say? lol
November 29th, 2008 at 9:26 am
Oh, I wasn’t saying it had been around all that time, the jam. Just within that timescale. You’re right though. I think the Federal government stamped it out (legally anyway) within thirty or forty years.
November 22nd, 2008 at 9:02 pm
@magnetite
Mormon polygamy hasn’t been around during that 5000 year timespan. Mormonism is very new, I think Brigham Young finally taught it in 1852 and before that Joe Smith was against it.
November 20th, 2008 at 6:55 am
Cant. Sleep. Must. Insult. Chuck. Norris.
So, Wa*ker:Steaksauce Ranger…how do you explain the Mormon love of polygamy - only stamped out recently (in your 5,000 year timescale) and the fact that while it didn’t last for long, it certainly wasn’t one man to one woman marriage.
Now, I wonder what Cynthia Rothrock’s views on import taxes are.