Anorak

HOME | FORUMS | Tabloids/Broadsheets | Strange But True | Royal Family | Race For The White House | Magazines | Celebrity | Madeleine McCann | Politics | Backpages | Casino/Poker | Twitterings | Anorak TV | Global Warming | War On Terror | Money | Immigration | Anorak People | ABOUT/CONTACT


Muslim Congressman Keith Ellison On 9/11 Nazis And George Bush

hitlerbush.jpgCONSPIRACY nuts come in all forms from pasty-faced, self-hating nerds who rarely see the light of day—to US Congressmen.

That’s right. America’s first Muslim congressman, Keith Ellison (Minnesota), has kicked up a storm by insinuating that September 11 was to the Bush Administration as the Reichstag fire was to the Nazis.

We’re not sure whether Ellison has visited the Reichstag lately and seen the wonderful job the Germans have done to the building since the fire in 1933.

Maybe he was just being optimistic that the World Trade Center could one day be restored to it’s former glory? Or maybe he was dropping a hint that Sir Norman Foster should be brought in to erect a glass dome on the proposed Freedom Tower?

Unfortunately for Ellison, his claim was interpreted as an accusation that the Bush Administration was in some way complicit in September 11 as a pretext for clamping down on power, just as the Nazis did when they set fire to the Reichstag in 1933 and pinned the blame on the Communists.

Ellison made his comments last week before an audience with a group called Atheists for Human Rights, who were surprisingly receptive of man who has embraced not one but two religions: Catholicism then Islam.

“It’s almost like the Reichstag fire, kind of reminds me of that,” Ellison told the crowd at a Minnesota library. “After the Reichstag was burned, they blamed the Communists for it, and it put the leader of that country in a position where he could basically have authority to do whatever he wanted,” Ellison said.

Later in the week Ellison was forced to clarify his comments to make sure no one thought he was accusing the Administration of organizing the September 11 attacks a la Hitler’s Brownshirts.

“Obviously, Osama bin Laden and the hijackers who carried out the murderous events are responsible for 9/11. The question is, however, how do we respond to this tragedy? With fear and rage? Or with courage and reason? I’m for courage and reason. This means that in the aftermath of 9/11, instead of invading Iraq, President Bush should have responded militarily where necessary, but even more so, diplomatically, and with all of our intelligence resources.”

If only Ellison had used his “intelligence resources” before he engaged his mouth.

  1. 1 Truthman Says:

    You couldn’t make it up. Is he related to Boris Johnson at all?

  2. 2 Colin Bryant Says:

    Obviously, Osama binLaden wasn’t involved in 911, but, although not necessarily orchestrating it, Bush was deeply involved in the ‘terrorist’ attacks on the WTC. The evidence for that is considerably greater than the evidence for a Creator. I hope that has ruffled a few feathers. Yes, it was a false flag operation, of sorts, and the real truth is gradualy emerging, albeit slowly, but gathering pace. Why do I believe binLaden wasn’t responsible? He always denied it. As simple as that. Would you deny anything you were responsible for that was very successfull? Of course not.

  3. 3 Anorak Says:

    It’s like the Holocaust deniers who seek to rewrite history - Oh, they say, Hitler and his godless goons only killed, say, a million Jews. It’s not the Jws who are the victims but the nazis who have been lied about. But wouldn’t it be brilliant if he had killed more. But he didn’t. But had he of…Wow! the mad Muslims and loons who deny 9/11 are the same. The Jewsdid it, they say. It wasn’t Muslims, they say. But had it been Muslims, then it would have been terrific. But it wasn’t…

  4. 4 Simon Says:

    I always had my own theory on the 9/11 date. They picked it so that every time an American phoned for the cops/ambulance/fire they would subliminally cream themselves. Hasn’t anybody else thought of that??? Of course it might just have been that American Airways were doing a special “buy one get one free” day.

  5. 5 Anorak Says:

    911 - oh, i say….

  6. 6 Anonymous Says:

    His( GWB) mother knows he is deity, so he cannot be Jewish, they stop short with the Messiah, until Barmizvah.

    Actually if I was was Dubya’s mum, arrrrrrrgh what a nightmare scenario!

    But Hitler is dead and gone, and the Jewish race has revived itself and survived despite his worst efforts.

    Leave Boris alone, blond maybe, but that dumbness stops at the follicles, and he’s kinda cute….and my mum doesn’t like him

  7. 7 Colin Bryant Says:

    I think the latest comments about a serious subject are pathetic.

  8. 8 Bob Whiteman Says:

    Ellison started to give his honest opinion, actually blurting out the obvious truth, but after thinking about the potential consequences and retalitorial possibilities, he had second thoughts (Prominent people die for less than that, like Paul Wellstone). BUSH complicity is unequivocal, undeniable. did you see any surprise on his face when he “got the news (from Andy Card, his advisor) of the attack on the WTC” on the video of him in the classroom, during his reading of “My Pet Goat”? Did he then lie about seeing the 1st jet collision on TV before he came to class? Yes, in reality, it hadn’t been televised yet. Did the US have 15 Air wargames planned that day? Yes. Did they scramble jets at intercept speed to bring the “highjackers” down, as they ALWAYS do under those circumstances? No. Did the towers burn down? No. Did they explode, sending dust and trace amounts of thermate in thier clouds? Yes. Did they collapse into thier own footprints at freefall speeds? Yes. Is al Qaeda a subcontractor for the CIA? Yes. Had Bin Laden been hospitalized for his liver ailment and had CIA operatives for visitors? Yes. Is he on the FBI’s most wanted list for the WTC attack? No. Did his Dad finance/fund GWB’s 1st oil company? Yes. Was the WTC7 brought down with explosives? Yes. Was the hole in the (recently reinforced) wall of the Pentagon big enough to accomodate the fuselage of a 757? No. Did Rumsfeld refer to that wall as the wall where “they had a missle hit”, in his near-dementia? Yes. Was it referred to by employees as the “catchers’ mitt”, after it renovating? Yes. Did he refer to the “War on Terrorism” as a war “without end”? Yes. Do any of these facts suggest the foreknowledge of GWB if not his outright complicity? To me, yes. But then I guess I’m one of those whacko, lunatic fringe conspiracy nuts so often referred to in ad hominem attacks from the enlightened ones, like some of your posters here.

  9. 9 Colin Bryant Says:

    Bob Whiteman has offered just some of the irrefutable evidence for the WTC destruction,evidence, much of which, is available from Government itself. For people to then dispute it seems to me like there are non so blind as those that aren’t informed enough to even know what eyes are.

  10. 10 Colin Bryant Says:

    Oh, I forget to mention that approximately twenty minutes before WT7 ‘collapsed’ a female BBC journalist standing not far from the building so it was visible over her shoulder offered, for all the world to see and hear, that “the world trade centre seven building has also collapsed”. Is that suspicious or is that suspicious?.

  11. 11 Anorak Says:

    Do you believe that the Islamists who blew up a trian in Madrid, a bar in bali and killed thousands in the Middle East and Darfur did not fly planes into the twin towers? that they did not hijack planes?

  12. 12 Anonymous Says:

    I guess they don’t worship at Mecca either or in mosques, but I really do hope they don’t get x amount of virgins on their ‘martyrdom’

  13. 13 Jane Says:

    This still bugs me. 9/11/2001, Pentagon. Where is the Boeing 757-sized hole? In fact, where is the Boeing 757? - http://i12.tinypic.com/6c7rm6t.jpg

  14. 14 Jane Says:

    9/11 was the Neocon’s own rechstag fire. 9/11 was STAGED. 9/11/2001, Pentagon. Where is the Boeing 757-sized hole? In fact, where is the Boeing 757? - http://i12.tinypic.com/6c7rm6t.jpg

  15. 15 MrSofty.com Says:

    A new report from a group of seismologists and architects seems to indicate a separate explosion minutes prior to the collapse …that appears to be consistent with a demolition explosion more than a jet crash……hmmn maybe the congressman was closer to the truth than he knows…..google it

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

website

Please copy the string MuM0lj to the field below: