<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Wants to Marry A U.S. Citizen - I Do</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philip A. Wilcoxson</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-342201</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip A. Wilcoxson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-342201</guid>
		<description>Grammer seems to be big thing when it comes to being successful in our society; eg business and academia and communications but what really matters is the point that you get across. If you have to be so stuck on grammer that you can't even communicate how you are really feeling or thinking you are not having peace about what you are doing and/or that is to say you can't be yourself. And if you can't be yourself in this world then what is the point of even living? Does that make sense? I don't know. I'm making this sh*t up as I go along. I'm no better than you. 

I think the Marriage thing is a really good idea because the American public seems to have a obsession with marriages when it comes to entertainment. There must be something missing in their lives and I think it says something about our core values that we may be missing or need or don't really have or really need to have. What do you think? At any rate one good way to get the attention of the American public is to sell yourself as entertainment by saying that you want to be or are looking for or are longing for or are hoping for to get married. There must be something special about marriage. What do you think? There is nothing more sacred or special than a relationship that you have with someone else then with a significant other that you can spend the rest of your life with and you can be loyal to and tell all of your problems too. I need to learn more about marriage. I think I am ignorant about many things. 

Dr. Phil :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grammer seems to be big thing when it comes to being successful in our society; eg business and academia and communications but what really matters is the point that you get across. If you have to be so stuck on grammer that you can&#8217;t even communicate how you are really feeling or thinking you are not having peace about what you are doing and/or that is to say you can&#8217;t be yourself. And if you can&#8217;t be yourself in this world then what is the point of even living? Does that make sense? I don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;m making this sh*t up as I go along. I&#8217;m no better than you. </p>
<p>I think the Marriage thing is a really good idea because the American public seems to have a obsession with marriages when it comes to entertainment. There must be something missing in their lives and I think it says something about our core values that we may be missing or need or don&#8217;t really have or really need to have. What do you think? At any rate one good way to get the attention of the American public is to sell yourself as entertainment by saying that you want to be or are looking for or are longing for or are hoping for to get married. There must be something special about marriage. What do you think? There is nothing more sacred or special than a relationship that you have with someone else then with a significant other that you can spend the rest of your life with and you can be loyal to and tell all of your problems too. I need to learn more about marriage. I think I am ignorant about many things. </p>
<p>Dr. Phil <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-139606</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-139606</guid>
		<description>Grammer Nazi.. so it's not just me who gets crazy about bad English and odd spelling, very good!
I suppose a looser would be the opposite of tighter (or a tightener)
What I meant to type was loser, that was a typo or typographical error. Glad you spotted it though.
 I never was much of a typist.
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grammer Nazi.. so it&#8217;s not just me who gets crazy about bad English and odd spelling, very good!<br />
I suppose a looser would be the opposite of tighter (or a tightener)<br />
What I meant to type was loser, that was a typo or typographical error. Glad you spotted it though.<br />
 I never was much of a typist.<br />
 <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrammarNazi</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-139416</link>
		<dc:creator>GrammarNazi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-139416</guid>
		<description>@David, a "looser"? is that the opposite of a "tighter"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David, a &#8220;looser&#8221;? is that the opposite of a &#8220;tighter&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anorak</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-138999</link>
		<dc:creator>Anorak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 12:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-138999</guid>
		<description>Is Hillary Clinton single yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Hillary Clinton single yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-138867</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 10:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-138867</guid>
		<description>Marrying a US citizen worked for me!
The difference being that we did it the usual way and are still married 31 years later. I can see how this will end... "I got my greencard! Goodbye looser!"
Isn't romance great?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marrying a US citizen worked for me!<br />
The difference being that we did it the usual way and are still married 31 years later. I can see how this will end&#8230; &#8220;I got my greencard! Goodbye looser!&#8221;<br />
Isn&#8217;t romance great?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JuneJohnson</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-138826</link>
		<dc:creator>JuneJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 08:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-138826</guid>
		<description>Such a glowing bride!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a glowing bride!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-138791</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 03:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/178085.html#comment-138791</guid>
		<description>Now that I would watch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I would watch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
