<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Clinton&#8217;s 3am Girl Supports Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/181747.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/181747.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/181747.html#comment-372849</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/181747.html#comment-372849</guid>
		<description>Hey Jean? You are being very judgmental even though you admit in your own post that you don't know the full story.  The Story says that the video is from EIGHT years ago. A video taken from when she was 9-10 years old. While she might have gotten paid for her job back then (more likely her parents) this means jack squat. Since it is storage footage The Clinton Administration didn't have to pay her again, but could take old videos that they owned and use it as they saw fit. The videos original use might have been something far different than what it was used for today.

Also, it was eight years ago. During this time especially since she was just a kid at the time, I think we shouldn't be upset with her if she changed her mind. (and who says she even supported the Clintons, or moreso Hillary back then. It would be her custodians that decided videos she was going to appear in, not her.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jean? You are being very judgmental even though you admit in your own post that you don&#8217;t know the full story.  The Story says that the video is from EIGHT years ago. A video taken from when she was 9-10 years old. While she might have gotten paid for her job back then (more likely her parents) this means jack squat. Since it is storage footage The Clinton Administration didn&#8217;t have to pay her again, but could take old videos that they owned and use it as they saw fit. The videos original use might have been something far different than what it was used for today.</p>
<p>Also, it was eight years ago. During this time especially since she was just a kid at the time, I think we shouldn&#8217;t be upset with her if she changed her mind. (and who says she even supported the Clintons, or moreso Hillary back then. It would be her custodians that decided videos she was going to appear in, not her.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Ryder</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/181747.html#comment-253113</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Ryder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/181747.html#comment-253113</guid>
		<description>Did Casey Knowles get paid for the ad? Then she should act like a professional and not someone that is in it for just the money. I am sure the Clinton campaign had a release from Casey Knowles to use her image. If Casey does not support Hillary Clinton why did she sign the release? Casey likes the spotlight and the money but not the people she released her image to. Young Americans should have better moral values and judgment. 

The phone ad for Hillary Client was intended to move people to decide for themselves which candidate had the most experience with handling a crisis situation. My vote is with Hillary Clinton. She has been able to name off from start to finish the correct protocol with handling foreign policy situation. Obama has a great speech and a wonderful way of creating divide of one against the other.  See what Obama has done with Casey Knowles, is he using her or is she using him for the stoplight??????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Casey Knowles get paid for the ad? Then she should act like a professional and not someone that is in it for just the money. I am sure the Clinton campaign had a release from Casey Knowles to use her image. If Casey does not support Hillary Clinton why did she sign the release? Casey likes the spotlight and the money but not the people she released her image to. Young Americans should have better moral values and judgment. </p>
<p>The phone ad for Hillary Client was intended to move people to decide for themselves which candidate had the most experience with handling a crisis situation. My vote is with Hillary Clinton. She has been able to name off from start to finish the correct protocol with handling foreign policy situation. Obama has a great speech and a wonderful way of creating divide of one against the other.  See what Obama has done with Casey Knowles, is he using her or is she using him for the stoplight??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/181747.html#comment-251034</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/anorak-in-new-york/181747.html#comment-251034</guid>
		<description>I think that this irony will have a direct impact on the Clinton campaign.
What was meant to pillory Sen. Obama may well blow up in Hillary's 'oh-so-smug' face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this irony will have a direct impact on the Clinton campaign.<br />
What was meant to pillory Sen. Obama may well blow up in Hillary&#8217;s &#8216;oh-so-smug&#8217; face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
