ASHLEY Cole, vomitous footballer to Wag Cheryl Cole, is wooing his allegedly cuckolded wife with loadsa prezzies.
For the occasion of Cheryl’s 25th birthday, C-Ashley bought her a villa in Spain, a plate of tofu in champagne sauce, and a cake shaped like a handbag and studded with “£5,200 of edible diamonds”.
Can a Wag live by lo-cal diamonds alone? And if not, should she throw them up?
Posted: 2nd, July 2008 | In: Back pages, Celebrities, Wags & Players Comments (6) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
Recent comments
- Graeme (aka eggman) on US Forced Fort Hood Murderer Nidal Hasan To Join The Army
- andrew smith on X Factor Live Blog: Olly Murs Marries And Danyl Johnson Does Prince Over
- ricmc on US Forced Fort Hood Murderer Nidal Hasan To Join The Army
- Montana on The Ten Craziest Reasons Why Nidal Malik Hasan Did It
- christ on The Ten Craziest Reasons Why Nidal Malik Hasan Did It
Regular Features
June 6th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
Ashley Cole and his wife belong together and do not get the reason behind this to write about every single step of their activities. that is so ashame. more importantly anyone can offer their wife what they want so get on with it… I love them and i hope they will start a familly together soon.
June 5th, 2009 at 9:42 pm
What is it with Cheryl Cole? She’s unbelievably talentless, except at having an orange face and a big gob. She and Cole represent everything that’s wrong with the UK - shallow, talentless people sucking up the gullibility of the “celeb” obsessed population.
June 5th, 2009 at 6:30 pm
Ashley may be a twat, but Cheryl seems to love him and thats enough for me
July 14th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
Cheryl Cole is beautiful, Ashley Cole is a twat . Why would would she bother with such a muppet?
I’m sure she could do much better
July 3rd, 2008 at 6:22 pm
These two deserve each other who cares they are both idiots who will end up divorced and he will have to give her half his earnings. At least no one else has to suffer from being married to either one of them they are both as bad as the other.
July 2nd, 2008 at 1:58 pm
what are “edible diamonds” when they’re at home then? either they’re sugar crystals(in which case they’re not actually diamonds and why would they cost £5k) or they really are diamonds and therefore liable to crack the lovely Cheryl’s pretty set of gnashers….? (last time I looked, diamond was a considerably harder substance than tooth enamel) - either way, he’s a complete t**t.