<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheryl Cole Passes Diamonds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/back-pages/185448.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/back-pages/185448.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/back-pages/185448.html#comment-343448</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=185448#comment-343448</guid>
		<description>Cheryl Cole is beautiful, Ashley Cole is a twat . Why would would she bother with such a  muppet?
I'm sure she could do much better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheryl Cole is beautiful, Ashley Cole is a twat . Why would would she bother with such a  muppet?<br />
I&#8217;m sure she could do much better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/back-pages/185448.html#comment-336960</link>
		<dc:creator>P Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=185448#comment-336960</guid>
		<description>These two deserve each other who cares they are both idiots who will end up divorced and he will have to give her half his earnings. At least no one else has to suffer from being married to either one of them they are both as bad as the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These two deserve each other who cares they are both idiots who will end up divorced and he will have to give her half his earnings. At least no one else has to suffer from being married to either one of them they are both as bad as the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dairy</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/back-pages/185448.html#comment-336097</link>
		<dc:creator>dairy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=185448#comment-336097</guid>
		<description>what are "edible diamonds" when they're at home then?   either they're sugar crystals(in which case they're not actually diamonds and why would they cost £5k) or they really are diamonds and therefore liable to crack the lovely Cheryl's pretty set of gnashers....? (last time I looked, diamond was a considerably harder substance than tooth enamel) -   either way, he's a complete t**t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what are &#8220;edible diamonds&#8221; when they&#8217;re at home then?   either they&#8217;re sugar crystals(in which case they&#8217;re not actually diamonds and why would they cost £5k) or they really are diamonds and therefore liable to crack the lovely Cheryl&#8217;s pretty set of gnashers&#8230;.? (last time I looked, diamond was a considerably harder substance than tooth enamel) -   either way, he&#8217;s a complete t**t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
