Anorak

Breaking Media, Politicians & Celebrities Since 1995

Tabloid news for broadsheet readers

HOME | FORUMS | Tabloids/Broadsheets | Strange But True | Royal Family | Race For The White House | Magazines | Celebrity | Madeleine McCann | Politics | Backpages | Casino/Poker | Twitterings | Anorak TV | Global Warming | War On Terror | Money | Immigration | Anorak People | ABOUT/CONTACT


Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: You Should See His Boyfriend

ahmadinejad-homosexuals Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: You Should See His Boyfriend “IS American right to demonise President Ahmadinejad of Iran?”

This is the Independent’s “big question”.

Ahmadinejad is billed as “controversial leader”. He says things like “In Iran, we don’t have homosexuals like in your country. We do not have this phenomenon. I don’t know who’s told you that we have it.”

The easy response would be “Your boyfriend did”. But that would be childish, no better then calling him names, such as “Evil” and “Madman Iran” (New York tabloids).

So should Ahmadinejad be monstered? The Times doesn’t say, it’s too busy watching Foreign Secretary David Miliband at Labour party conference and employing the headline “Aaaargh! It’s Frankenstein’s minister…”

Do the Iranian newspapers speak of Ahmadinejad in the same open fashion? As the man told us, his is free society, the Iranian peoples “joyous”. He can take a joke.

But to the Indy’s question. Is the US right. It says it is mistaken in conferring upon Ahmadinejad a prominence that is not his due. He is not the top nutter in Iran. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei “calls the shots and dictates nuclear policy”. He’s the joyous one who told us: “The only way to confront the Zionist enemy is the continuation and fortification of resistance and Jihad.”

The Indy says the other mistake is that scaremongering enables Ahmadinejad to “portray nuclear power as a priority and a matter of national pride”.

What odds a nuclear mushroom cloud appearing on the Iranian flag, in similar fashion to how it’s allies at Hezbollah show a garish green Kalashnikov on theirs. (Flags, like weaponry, must move with the times.)

And, then, personal insults, as the Indy, says are never edifying. Ahmadinejad might be a jumped up, onanistic-eyed gibbon with chronic short-man syndrome but it would be beneath us to say so.

So he should not be demonised by the Americans. Ahmadinejad should be allowed to speak freely and openly. As his comments on homosexuality show, the more he speaks, the scarier he looks…

Pic: Cox & Forkum 

  1. 1 Sen. Larry Craig Says:

    IS American right to demonise President Ahmadinejad of Iran?

    HELL YEAH, look what they did to me!!! Hey Mahmoud, wanna come to the Minneapolis airport men’s room with me?

    They’ll let you “get it on” and “get off” as much as you’ll like in there.

    wack, wack, wack, wacko
    cock, cock, cockadoo

  2. 2 Hang The Gays, Says Iran’s Mohsen Yahyavi | Anorak News Says:

    [...] Remember this? [...]

  3. 3 Kian Kiani Says:

    Voice of America: A nest of fiasco

    I would like to bring your attention to matters most important at the Persian Service of Voice of America; especially during this juncture when confrontation between the U.S. and the government of Iran is on a collision course. The people at VOA are in charge of conveying the true message of the government of the United States (freedom) by presenting it through clear and comprehensible programs which are broadcast to the Iranian people.
    The end results of programming from Voice of America, however, are nothing but ludicrous and disgraceful. I declare this since I worked in the department and I know from first hand experience the complete lack of competence.
    The cockamamie management team consists of a woman with no formal education, no journalism background and no experience in anything but ass licking; and an eighty-five year old man who has never been in charge of any job, but perhaps as a barber, skilled in altering his hair color by dying it from white to blonde, then to black, then to brown…
    You might assume that due to the non-stop emergence of fiascos in the Bush administration (The World Bank’s Wolfowitz scandal, Pentagon’s lack of post Iraq war planning, Condoleezza Rice’s magnum opus ‘non-diplomacy’ in the Middle East, and of course, Gonzales at DOJ), which have all culminated in such disrespect for the United States throughout Europe and the entire world, that it would have left no time for the administration to investigate Voice of America. You are wrong.
    The fiasco at VOA, millions dollar waste, first class trips and hotel accommodations by the few people in the management are so apparent and bizarre that even Tom Coburn (Republican Senator from Oklahoma) wrote a letter addressed to President Bush in February regarding the disastrous situation at Voice of America with a copy also sent to the State Department.
    The result? Nothing! Absolutely nothing!
    There is no doubt that this administration will be remembered as the most corrupt, reckless, and careless administration in the history of the United States of America. We will continue inform you in this issue and welcome any input by the news media and the people who care about the future of this great country.

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

website

Please copy the string NqhyaQ to the field below: