Anorak

Breaking Media, Politicians & Celebrities Since 1995

Tabloid news for broadsheet readers

HOME | FORUMS | Tabloids/Broadsheets | Strange But True | Royal Family | Race For The White House | Magazines | Celebrity | Madeleine McCann | Politics | Backpages | Casino/Poker | Twitterings | Anorak TV | Global Warming | War On Terror | Money | Immigration | Anorak People | ABOUT/CONTACT


First Crown Court Case With No Jury

NOTES the Telegraph: “Prosecutors are planning to apply for permission to hold a major criminal trial without a jury in what would be a legal first for England.

The Crown is pressing for a judge-only trial because of concerns that jurors in the case could be subject to intimidation or bribery.

It is understood the request - which will be submitted to the judge on Tuesday - follows consultation with the Director of Public Prosecution.

Why now? Why is this case so execeptional? When the Anorak worked on and around Fleet Street, I used to spend many rainy afternoons sat in the gallery at the Old Bailey. When brave enough, I’d glance at the other members of the gallery who would often be friends and family of the accused. They would stare hard at the witnesses and then the jury. Some would be around the nearby St Paul’s Station or on the platform to see the witnesses emerging.

No jury. No problem…

 

del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Tailrank Furl Bloglines Newsvine Fark

3 Responses to “First Crown Court Case With No Jury”

  1. 1
    noseycow Says:

    Anorak - and we all know that judges never leave themselves open to blackmail/bribery do they…

    the solution - a virtual trial via anorak :)

    Administrator: Oh Goody, Goody, Gum Drops! What have you done? -agw

  2. 2
    Anorak Says:

    Hang ‘em. High! And then turn ‘em upside down

  3. 3
    JuneJohnson Says:

    Wonder what ‘cyber ‘em’ could really mean?

Leave a Reply

Please copy the string w98gdm to the field below: