<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jon Snow Has &#8216;No Contact With Ordinary Human Feeling&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/181419.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/181419.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/181419.html#comment-255334</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/181419.html#comment-255334</guid>
		<description>May I respectfully suggest a item Jon might use on his program.
&#62; It involves the common thread of media personalities who manage to 
&#62; wangle jobs in the media for their children.
&#62; I think Jon would be ideally suited to attack this phenomenon 
&#62; otherwise known as nepotism.
&#62; I tried to get my own son son a job on TYCO as a trainee electrician 
&#62; and was told it breached company guidlines.
&#62; My boss at the time was that paragon of probity L.Denis 
&#62; Koslowski currently doing 8 to 25 in a US penitentiary for fraud.
&#62; Anyway my own personal knockback set me thinking as I watched the 
&#62; great and the good who preach to me on TV about the morals of others 
&#62; and their own behaviour.
&#62; The title of the program could be HYPOCISY IN PUBLIC LIFE or somesuch 
&#62; and Jon would be my ideal celeb to front it.
&#62; How about it Channel 4?
&#62;  
&#62; Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I respectfully suggest a item Jon might use on his program.<br />
&gt; It involves the common thread of media personalities who manage to<br />
&gt; wangle jobs in the media for their children.<br />
&gt; I think Jon would be ideally suited to attack this phenomenon<br />
&gt; otherwise known as nepotism.<br />
&gt; I tried to get my own son son a job on TYCO as a trainee electrician<br />
&gt; and was told it breached company guidlines.<br />
&gt; My boss at the time was that paragon of probity L.Denis<br />
&gt; Koslowski currently doing 8 to 25 in a US penitentiary for fraud.<br />
&gt; Anyway my own personal knockback set me thinking as I watched the<br />
&gt; great and the good who preach to me on TV about the morals of others<br />
&gt; and their own behaviour.<br />
&gt; The title of the program could be HYPOCISY IN PUBLIC LIFE or somesuch<br />
&gt; and Jon would be my ideal celeb to front it.<br />
&gt; How about it Channel 4?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/181419.html#comment-244338</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 08:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/181419.html#comment-244338</guid>
		<description>zonk

Since when was it a privilege to avoid being written about in the media? If they were treating him like an ordinary soldier - they'd print nothing about it. 

I don't like wars and I don't think there's any need for a Royal Family (beyond entertainment) but credit where it's due - he was doing his job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zonk</p>
<p>Since when was it a privilege to avoid being written about in the media? If they were treating him like an ordinary soldier - they&#8217;d print nothing about it. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like wars and I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any need for a Royal Family (beyond entertainment) but credit where it&#8217;s due - he was doing his job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zonk</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/181419.html#comment-244102</link>
		<dc:creator>Zonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/broadsheets/181419.html#comment-244102</guid>
		<description>Of course he was given a privliege. His situation was unique. Pure PR for the army and Royal Family to make them relevance, and allow Charles 'to identify' with familes of those who serve.

Sickening state of affairs. 3 SAS close protection officers. What a load of rubbish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course he was given a privliege. His situation was unique. Pure PR for the army and Royal Family to make them relevance, and allow Charles &#8216;to identify&#8217; with familes of those who serve.</p>
<p>Sickening state of affairs. 3 SAS close protection officers. What a load of rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
