Noticing Chris Langham And Paedophiles
SAYS actor Chris Langham - jailed and convicted of 15 charges of downloading indecent images of children from the internet: “If I was a paedophile someone would have noticed, surely?”
Anyone like to explain to him how paedophiles try not to be noticed..?
January 7th, 2008 at 9:59 am
He’s creepy and he was busted.
I might have given him the benefit of the doubt if it wasn’t for the multiple excuses he gave - he was researching a character, he came across it accidentally, it was ghoulish curiosity, he was only looking at the perpetrators not the victims - and then, finally, he was abused as a child by a ginger.
Definitely a pervert.
January 7th, 2008 at 10:15 am
Should it be a crime to look?
January 7th, 2008 at 11:56 am
Anorak
Of course it should if there’s a market for it and children are being abused to supply the market.
January 7th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
2
Anorak Says:
January 7th, 2008 at 10:15 am
Should it be a crime to look?
***************
I think so. The viewer becomes as guilty as the perpetrator of the abuse. The more viewings logged, the more the abusers believe their interest is shared.
This is quite aside from the huge financial gains being made by those who have no scruples about damaging a vulnerable child, probably for the rest of that child’s life.
January 7th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Am astonished to hear my views on child abuse need to be moderated!
January 7th, 2008 at 7:55 pm
Mods and Admin
May
They weren’t, you posted what seemed to be a rhetorical or at least confusing post in another thread questioning it. We do NOT check every thread before we answer, we answer where we find it.
As I explained there, the unapprove and spam mechanisms have a glitch, and that is why you were moderated.
BUT do check agw’s reply to Hideki whose dangerous posts left us all nauseated,(SUN a.m.) and you will see why I appeared to over react to your question.