Brad And Angelina Jolie In Headlock Drama
HELLO! magazine has a question for its readers: “BRAD AND ANGELINA – DOES THIS COUPLE LOOK LIKE A COUPLE IN CRISIS?”
The question is accompanied by a shot of the two actors – Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, for it is they – entwined before the cameras.
While not in the same league as Danny Zuko & Sandy Olsson, Pitt and Jolie do look to be close, and not just physically – in the shot Brad’s right nostril is pressed against Jolie’s forehead.
Hello! readers may well have made their minds up. But before they do there are many pages of evidence to study.
Exhibit A: Brad and Ange are on an ocean of Cannes red carpet. Brad is walking one, perhaps one and one half steps ahead of Angelina. He is holding her right hand in his left hand.
He looks to the left; she straight ahead. What does it mean, jurors? Discuss.
Exhibit B: They stop and look at each other.
Exhibit C: They both look to the right. He looks tanned. She looks like the green lady on the poster above the pub snooker table.
Exhibit D: The rear view. Brad holds her hand; but her hand is limp in his, like a strip of beige corduroy trouser.
Exhibit E: She turns to face the cameras. She pouts; Brad smiles, also to a camera.
Amid the poses and the pictures, a source says that Brad has never been in a clinch with a nanny, nor has he seen Jennifer Aniston; and is not the other man in the Peter Andre - Katie Price split.
Exhibit E: Inside Le Baoli Bar-Restaurant in Cannes, Brad and Ange are still together.
Exhibit F: Brad is speaking to a man; Ange is speaking to anther man.
Exhibit G: “Brad and Angelina’s passion for each other was in plain view”. They are cradling each other’s heads in the manner of a) lovers; b) WWWF Wrestlers; c) Two Glaswegian drunks in a public toilet.
Exhibit H: They are now seated. Ange places a hand on Brad’s thigh. Brad is facing away from her.
Says a “relative” of the allegations of marital infidelity:
“You can’t raise all those kids and have two movie careers and be philanthropic in so many areas while at the same time care about such silliness. They just can’t be bothered. They don’t have time to be bothered.”
Indeed. When they are not working apart, supporting pet causes and instructing the nannies and the staff, they are as together as any other normal happy-happy-HAPPY couple.
And so to the bruning question - do they look like a couple in crisis?
Posted: 26th, May 2009 | In: Celebrities Comments (3) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- yampster on Britain’s Got Talent Hollie Steel Guns For X Factor’s John And Edward
- coolandcalm on Flexetarians Are Meat-Eating Vegetarians
- Peter Loxley on True Blood Porn, Oral Sex And Vampire Orgies, In Pictures
- Cheryl on Fort Hood Shootings Latest News: US Soldier Nidal Hasan Shoots 13 Dead
- dairy on Shaddap You Face: John & Edward Fight To Bring Back The Novelty Christmas Song
May 27th, 2009 at 2:56 pm
…and they are both, of course, great actors…. who knows if that extends to their private life as well as on film…?
May 27th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
If they were not a couple in crisis, would you be asking if we think they were a couple in crisis? Why should we think it, unless you told us that they are a couple in crisis. Everything about this relationship was wrong. Not just the way they met, but the way they publicised their relationship without caring that someone got divorced as a result and divorces are painful irrespective of how much one can say that it happened because two people are over each other. The kids came too fast, meanwhile the reports between the two were not great — wine throwing, lap dancing, political arguments — then the adoption, lousy movies, excessive publicity on their oscar potential, disappointing performances, twins, more screaming and shouting and stupid comments on the ex-wife. The question is: when did this couple really do the right thing?? Picking up orphaned babies is great, but not if you are simultaneously planning your next photo shoot of your twins and where to sell the photographs. While every photo of the couple with the kids seems perfect before the cameras, any parent who is really into parenting can tell you that such perfection is simply wierd and unreal. Only those who have no clue about parenting would try to achieve such idiotic perfection. Britney may not have been perfect but Federline knew how to keep the kids out of the camera’s way. That may not be perfect, but it is definitely more real. This couple — if they want to remain a couple — has a chance only if they can get real about who they are and who they want to be and how to get there. And for that you need to let the world see your flaws — most of them — if you want to remain in the limelight honestly.
May 26th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
the author of this article needs spell check