Anorak Forums » Backlash

1. chenier
   Member

   We're back to those default swaps again, and the reason why they have nothing to do with insurance and everything to do with speculating on other people's property; Simon Evans in the Independent reports today, the 12th October:

   'It is like Joe Public buying an insurance policy on someone else's house and pocketing the full value if it burns down.'

   Ring any bells?

   On the 25th September I wrote:

   'Anorak could take out a vast insurance policy on Anorak Towers, and if it burned down Anorak would get lots of dosh but no Anorak Towers.

   Insurers won’t let me take out a vast insurance policy on Anorak Towers, because I would have a clear interest in setting fire to Anorak Towers and collecting lots of dosh.

   Of course, I wouldn’t have Anorak Towers, but then I didn’t have Anorak Towers in the first place.'

   My highly reputable lawyers, Messrs Sue, Sue and Suesomemore, will no doubt be in touch with the Indie's briefs...

   Posted 4 years ago #

2. agw
   Administrator

   Welcome to Filch Villa, Cyber Ave, Plagiarist, Nuneaton. We see our stuff stolen, re-printed without the pretence of a re-work and some cheeky swine even treat our stuff as their original work and discuss it as such.

   There's an old truism: "Every magnificent and munificent body can afford a few parasites."
   When you have fleas, is it still considered impolite to scratch?

   Posted 4 years ago #

3. chenier
   Member

   Depends what you are scratching with.

   The curse of Anorka is upon them, and I am consulting with Cool and Calm as to the best method of conjuring a pox of tamba flies upon their groins.

   That should put paid to their chances of using their 10 best sex toys...

   Posted 4 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.