Anorak

Anorak Discussion and Gossip!

Anorak Forums » Backlash

Was David Icke right about Jimmy Saville?

(10 posts)
  • Started 7 months ago by Percy Stilton
  • Latest reply from Anorak

  1. Percy Stilton
    Member

    David Icke thinks he's possibly a prophet & he has been seen in the occasional shell suit....but could he have been right about Sir Jimmy Saville all along?...is this a sign?
    http://www.theglobalconspiracy.org/2012/10/david-icke-was-right-about-jimmy-savile.html#.UHidc64A4Jc.facebook

    Posted 7 months ago #
  2. dairy
    Member

    ironic isn't it - one of the few people to speak out about Jimmy Savile and his activities is decried because he made a prat of himself in his turquoise shell suit.
    I have heard about the necrophiliac rumours - exceptionally unpleasant. He also, allegedly, had his own keys to Broadmoor... why was that deemed necessary, you might ask? Unfortunately I think this story has a lot more to run....

    Posted 7 months ago #
  3. Anorakaren
    Member

    I read some rumours about him and had to Google one of the words, which made me wish I hadn't bothered.

    I have to say, I'm sick of his leering, pervy face looking at me from Anorak and my Facebook news feed. It gives me the creeps.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  4. Percy Stilton
    Member

    I think David Icke has got quite a cute face Karen...although I agree...he is quite creepy

    Posted 7 months ago #
  5. Anorakaren
    Member

    Percy, you know I meant Jimmy Savile

    Posted 7 months ago #
  6. Percy Stilton
    Member

    if this report is true it seems Saville might have claimed another abused victim from beyond the grave...shame it had to be Esther Rantzen.
    http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/334919

    Posted 7 months ago #
  7. Anorakaren
    Member

    If she only heard rumours, I feel sorry for her being sacked. I suppose it just depends what she actually knew.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  8. dairy
    Member

    I think that's unfair - from what I can gather, what she heard/knew occurred before she got involved with the child abuse campaigns. She has done a lot of incredible work with Childline over the years and she wasn't the only one to have heard things or even witnessed things about Savile and either said nothing or said something and not been believed. She was also one of the first "celebrities" to come out and condemn him when the allegations first arose via the ITV programme. Too much too late or better late than never?

    Posted 7 months ago #
  9. agw
    Member

    No you are all right, to some degree.
    Sir James Wilson Vincent Savile, OBE, KCSG - "Smelly Old Git" to his more mature victims - was not alone. Others covered up because of easy sexual favours, career ambitions or fear of disclosure.

    There are other forms of predatory sexual abuse and career leg ups:
    The reference below dates eight years after the fact. Eight years of clandestine bumping the uglies or as Wilcox described his soirees with Rantzen "urgent" talks.

    That's life: Esther Rantzen broke my mother's heart

    The Wilcox children were less than amused. If there had been a Childline then - and knowing what the principal's principles were - they may have not used it.

    Posted 7 months ago #
  10. Anorak
    Key Master

    Thanks. I' e been dithering about what to do with the forum on the new site... Looks like we need one. But with better security.

    Posted 7 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.