Breaking Media, Politicians & Celebrities Since 1995

As the saying goes, “History always repeats itself” and the similarities with the JonBenet Ramsey case are shocking. Read this article (long but good read):-
http://crimemagazine.com/jonbenet.htm

Todays Telegraph reports on the build-up of evidence against them:-
“Kate and Gerry are utterly convinced there is an entirely innocent explanation for every shred of it.” The friend said a pair of Madeleine’s unwashed pyjamas had been among the clothes thrown into the back of the car when the McCanns left the holiday apartment. They left in a hurry, throwing their belongings into carrier bags, plastic sacks and even loose, because they were trying to avoid the media.

Sorry, but I find it impossible to believe that Gerry “I want to be the next James Bond” Mccann wanted to avoid press publicity at that time. He was loving every minute of it, just look at his daily schedule while his daughter was missing. You only have to look at the boring medical articles he has to write for journals to see what a dull life he previously lived. He virtually called newspaper editors and journalists from the moment he woke each morning. He was loving all the attention.

3. ITS COOL
The Mccans say dont worry folks, we can explain everything. Well, with the country’s top criminal defence lawyer being paid for by one of the country’s richest men, I am sure the Mccans can “explain” anything and everything that happened in the whole world ever….. crop circles, the bermuda triangle…

Pinochet was accused of being involved in the death of 3000 people, so the Mccanns case is small fry for Angus McBride who also acted for Langham when he was accused of being a paedophile. Even after the case, DCI Paul Fotheringham of Kent police said “He doesn’t like the label, but I am satisfied that he is a paedophile.”
See: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/india_knight/article2461236.ece

And the McCanns paid PR man says they are innocent too, so they must be. Or is he just doing his job?

There’s an idea. If the Mccann’s paid each of the 68million people in Britain 1.406pence from their fund, they could then ask them all to insist they were innocent and then we can blame it all on the unknown moustached bogey-man tourist hovering behind Gerry Mccan in that holiday snap. But wasnt he a bit too short to climb through the bedroom window?

But it would be a lot easier if the whole Tapas 9 came clean about what really happened that evening. What are they waiting for - hasnt the News of the World offered them enough yet for a world exclusive?

Put this over from the last string:
a new taste to the story: moving filled and unclosed nappies from one house to another.Their luggage must still be stinking. Do english doctors ever learn any hygienical standards? Or did they open the nappies that one wouldn’t smell something else?
and ‘brandon flowers’(1019):so we can add lack of hygene to the neglect list

Decent debate disappears when you arrive Moderation - you don’t like opinions do you? Other than your own of course - because you are the champion of common sense.
Much better to waffle from the fence isn’t it?

One theory that has been promulagated on anorak can at least be put down.

It was suggested that the PJ were trying to frame the McCanns because the affair was bad for tourism on the Algarve.

In the Miiror yesterday, we read “The Algarve Tourist Board yesterday said tourism had increased after expecting a fall in visitors. They said ‘It’s been exceptional with hotel occupancy at 98.6 per cent’.

So, no fall in revenues … no evidence for a frame-up.

Dirty nappies thrown in the back of the car? Wearing unwashed clothes which have been in contact with a corpse on holiday? Taking a child’s favourite toy to work and letting it come into contact with corpses? No wonder there is such a problem with MRSA in hospitals in the UK!

Morning truth hounds.

Looking forward to seeing where the scent of the evidence is going to take us today - so far it looks as if Ian Willis will be our pack leader.

Looking forward to hours of diverting commentary. But will only the cadaver dogs be barking?

14 Moderation - Of course, you live in the world where only disposable nappies exist!

No not at all. My sister used cloth nappies for both of her children but would use disposable on holiday due to the simple fact that she didn’t have access to a washing machine. Somehow, I cannot see Mrs McCann using the washing machine, if one was indeed available, at the MW facility every day.

If these nappies (whatever their providence) are so important to the McCann’s case, why did they fail to preserve the evidence in sealed evidence bads.

Does team McCann have no investigative or forsenic expertise?

Again i think this delay is giving police a chance to give them enough rope to hang themselves!

they are deluded and feel they are above the law

Is the object the PJ is looking for hidden in a nappie?

‘Kate says her Portuguese lawyer believes in her and Gerry McCann’s innocence: “She’s also of the view that everyone she has spoken to in Praia da Luz also believe we didn’t do it.”’

Yeah but I thought Kate and Gerry also remarked that the Portuguese are morons? Or something along those lines?

Morning all

These nappies sound “interesting”. Surely, even when one is moving in a hurry (sounds like a moonlight flit to me and IF as has been alleged, the media know of the Mc’s every move, how come there are no piccy’s of the hurried move?) anyway, even when one is moving in a hurry, one does tend to throw one’s rubbish away rather than lug it with one to the next residence - even when doing a moonlight flit!

This idea of them moving out of the glare of the public eye leads to another question

Just as it was possible for them to move their belongings without pictures of the not new possibly used, maybe clean, maybe dirty nappies coming to light, is it not equally possible for them to have moved the body, in a sports bag as she was a tiny little thing, without any pictures too??

Just a thought…………(and for those of you who are going to start screeching about the body decomposing and freezers etc…..think air conditioning!)

OK … lets be logical here:

The McCanns were on holiday - even if they had unpacked all of their luggage in the apartment that they were originally in … the police re-packed it for them when they moved to the second apartment after Madeleine disappeared.

Why then would they UNpack Madeleine’s things when she wasn’t there, including dirty laundry, so that when they moved again it was all loose in the back of the car.

Even if they DID unpack her things, why would they not pack things back into suitcases for the second move - the press were not in their apartment, and anyway (according to Gerry’s Blog) there were hardly any press around at all by the time they moved into the villa.

Who in God’s name piles clothing and used nappies together in the back of a car? To quote clarence Mitchell - it would be laughable if it wasn’t so serious!

If there is one thing that REALLY makes me angry, it is being taken for an idiot - and quite frankly this claim is so absurd that I cannot help but think that the McCanns’ and their team view the British Public as complete morons!

15. Miss Match Says:
September 19th, 2007 at 9:03 am

Somehow, I cannot see Mrs McCann using the washing machine, if one was indeed available, at the MW facility every day.

_______________________________________________________________________

Your “somehow” is well grounded. We cannot forget that neither Gerry nor kate could be bothered to take their children out to dine with them or to hire a sitter. So this leave a normal person’s imagination logically unable to grasp the idea of cloth diapers /nappies.

Although the McCanns more than likely cannot handle babyshit they sure as hell do quite well handling other varieties.

Hoepfully the proverbial fan is on full blast and soon the you-know-what will hit it.