<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Entertaining The Viewers At Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hot Fuss</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-51952</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Fuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-51952</guid>
		<description>Anorak is running out of steam again. All the inbreds who were convinced of the McCanns guilt without enough conclusive evidence appear to be leaving in their droves. Great news.
They can get back to what they do best... BNP rallies and AA meetings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anorak is running out of steam again. All the inbreds who were convinced of the McCanns guilt without enough conclusive evidence appear to be leaving in their droves. Great news.<br />
They can get back to what they do best&#8230; BNP rallies and AA meetings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50507</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50507</guid>
		<description>Mary:  If thats all you can come up with, you sound as dump as the Portuguese police.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary:  If thats all you can come up with, you sound as dump as the Portuguese police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50485</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50485</guid>
		<description>So now not only are big PR guns and lawyer guns needed but calling the dogs out on people. Is that it Golden Retriever?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now not only are big PR guns and lawyer guns needed but calling the dogs out on people. Is that it Golden Retriever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50483</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50483</guid>
		<description>Golden Retriever,

You say, You say, You’re a peice of %$#@. Keep it contained over there.

Is that a threat? I am unsure how to interpret?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Golden Retriever,</p>
<p>You say, You say, You’re a peice of %$#@. Keep it contained over there.</p>
<p>Is that a threat? I am unsure how to interpret?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50482</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50482</guid>
		<description>Golden Retriever,

You say, You’re a peice of %$#@. Keep it contained over there.


I ask over where?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Golden Retriever,</p>
<p>You say, You’re a peice of %$#@. Keep it contained over there.</p>
<p>I ask over where?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50481</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50481</guid>
		<description>Golden Retriever,

Where are you talking about when you say this:

You’re a peice of %$#@. Keep it contained over there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Golden Retriever,</p>
<p>Where are you talking about when you say this:</p>
<p>You’re a peice of %$#@. Keep it contained over there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50480</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50480</guid>
		<description>You can go on if you want to. I don't mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can go on if you want to. I don&#8217;t mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golden Retriever</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50302</link>
		<dc:creator>Golden Retriever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50302</guid>
		<description>12 - That's what you call NICE?? You need to get out more often Patricia

Unless you're on the same drugs as Teddy Boy. Hallucenigenics. Of course his excuse is that he has about 7 alter egos - and steals lines from American posters too. Then he's off trashing the likes of them.. And he's not funny I may add. Hey Ted, I'll make youse a deal, youse keep your hairy arse over on your turf, and don't be comin around our door no more for "salmonella" (check the spelling while you're at it) in DC restaurants. I guess you didn't get the hint after the first round of "salmonella poisoning"...LOL - so let me make it loud and clear - "we ain't interested in your anti american rhetoric" So Keep it on Anorak, he encourages your type to post here - calls it "satire"? Now, that's funny!! I call it xenophobic.

Here's what is funny though: you and your alter egos run out of material and have no problem borrowing from us - yesterday, it was Abe Lincoln, today I see it's others lines.  You're a peice of %$#@.  Keep it contained over there.

Oh, when you go on vacation next week, do you take all  your alter egos with you? Or leave some of them back under the rock you crawled out from underneath? Just wondering...

Wonder what Miss Marple is up to? Or Ian? Or noonethere.....need I go on??!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12 - That&#8217;s what you call NICE?? You need to get out more often Patricia</p>
<p>Unless you&#8217;re on the same drugs as Teddy Boy. Hallucenigenics. Of course his excuse is that he has about 7 alter egos - and steals lines from American posters too. Then he&#8217;s off trashing the likes of them.. And he&#8217;s not funny I may add. Hey Ted, I&#8217;ll make youse a deal, youse keep your hairy arse over on your turf, and don&#8217;t be comin around our door no more for &#8220;salmonella&#8221; (check the spelling while you&#8217;re at it) in DC restaurants. I guess you didn&#8217;t get the hint after the first round of &#8220;salmonella poisoning&#8221;&#8230;LOL - so let me make it loud and clear - &#8220;we ain&#8217;t interested in your anti american rhetoric&#8221; So Keep it on Anorak, he encourages your type to post here - calls it &#8220;satire&#8221;? Now, that&#8217;s funny!! I call it xenophobic.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what is funny though: you and your alter egos run out of material and have no problem borrowing from us - yesterday, it was Abe Lincoln, today I see it&#8217;s others lines.  You&#8217;re a peice of %$#@.  Keep it contained over there.</p>
<p>Oh, when you go on vacation next week, do you take all  your alter egos with you? Or leave some of them back under the rock you crawled out from underneath? Just wondering&#8230;</p>
<p>Wonder what Miss Marple is up to? Or Ian? Or noonethere&#8230;..need I go on??!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50269</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50269</guid>
		<description>I havent a clue anymore if the Mccanns are guilty or not but everytine someone uses the word "ludicrous", "laughable", "insane" or "ridiculous" about the suspicion against them I become more convinced that they are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I havent a clue anymore if the Mccanns are guilty or not but everytine someone uses the word &#8220;ludicrous&#8221;, &#8220;laughable&#8221;, &#8220;insane&#8221; or &#8220;ridiculous&#8221; about the suspicion against them I become more convinced that they are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Usual Suspect</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50058</link>
		<dc:creator>The Usual Suspect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50058</guid>
		<description>There is a perception that because a story happens to be in the public eye that this somehow means that stories in TV programs need to be altered or cancelled to avoid 'upsetting the parents'.  I can only assume that this is why, since no-one else can claim to be closely enough involved to be affected by what happens in a TV story.

It therefore follows that the producers of these shows believe that parents of children in similar circumstances who do not have the benefit of this much publicity would not be upset by these stories.  It seems to me that they believe that the only people who are important are those in the public eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a perception that because a story happens to be in the public eye that this somehow means that stories in TV programs need to be altered or cancelled to avoid &#8216;upsetting the parents&#8217;.  I can only assume that this is why, since no-one else can claim to be closely enough involved to be affected by what happens in a TV story.</p>
<p>It therefore follows that the producers of these shows believe that parents of children in similar circumstances who do not have the benefit of this much publicity would not be upset by these stories.  It seems to me that they believe that the only people who are important are those in the public eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy J</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50049</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-50049</guid>
		<description>oh I hope they don't pull Torn - I was going to watch that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh I hope they don&#8217;t pull Torn - I was going to watch that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49778</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49778</guid>
		<description>After visiting the forum I can tell the British people are nice. Regardless, after watching Clarence Mitchell and the PR manipulations I will worry from now on when the British government asks for assistance. YES. So, one cute girl Madeleine has been like a preview of the big picture? The big picture is watch just how low the UK PR will go. Hopefully many people have been keeping an eye on all of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After visiting the forum I can tell the British people are nice. Regardless, after watching Clarence Mitchell and the PR manipulations I will worry from now on when the British government asks for assistance. YES. So, one cute girl Madeleine has been like a preview of the big picture? The big picture is watch just how low the UK PR will go. Hopefully many people have been keeping an eye on all of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49722</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49722</guid>
		<description>My question is how far back was there a strong indication of a death theory involving Madeleine?

How many people had privacy invasion as a result of Madeleine missing and how many could have possible had Madeleine or anything to do with her disappearance?

Wow, to investigate people in a country other than the UK, would the UK need approval? For example, if it was in some absurd way thought someone across the pond could have Madeleine would the US need to approve an investigation? Wow, The question is an attempt to evaluate phone, computer privacy. Does anyone have a clue anymore? I ask as a result of reading articles early on about the investigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is how far back was there a strong indication of a death theory involving Madeleine?</p>
<p>How many people had privacy invasion as a result of Madeleine missing and how many could have possible had Madeleine or anything to do with her disappearance?</p>
<p>Wow, to investigate people in a country other than the UK, would the UK need approval? For example, if it was in some absurd way thought someone across the pond could have Madeleine would the US need to approve an investigation? Wow, The question is an attempt to evaluate phone, computer privacy. Does anyone have a clue anymore? I ask as a result of reading articles early on about the investigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49709</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49709</guid>
		<description>yep I couldnt have said it better,  the odd shopping trolley too - no wheels of course

can you believe it,  I got sent back cos I couldnt add 5 + 9  ha ha  put 13</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep I couldnt have said it better,  the odd shopping trolley too - no wheels of course</p>
<p>can you believe it,  I got sent back cos I couldnt add 5 + 9  ha ha  put 13</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anorak</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49708</link>
		<dc:creator>Anorak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49708</guid>
		<description>Stray dogs and lorry drivers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stray dogs and lorry drivers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49704</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49704</guid>
		<description>I agree Ben, its a bit like the M1 over there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Ben, its a bit like the M1 over there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49699</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49699</guid>
		<description>hey you guys dont mind me being on here,
there is a load of suffregettes on the other forum.
its bedlam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey you guys dont mind me being on here,<br />
there is a load of suffregettes on the other forum.<br />
its bedlam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49683</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49683</guid>
		<description>dont give the mccanns ideas,  they will be hosting there own big brother just now,  no no</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont give the mccanns ideas,  they will be hosting there own big brother just now,  no no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billy</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49648</link>
		<dc:creator>billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49648</guid>
		<description>the highest so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the highest so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49580</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/176457.html#comment-49580</guid>
		<description>Clarence who packed his job in instantly after being asked to work as the mccanns spokesman said this,

Mr Mitchell, who spent a month with the couple in Portugal after Madeleine went missing on May 3, said: “Sometimes I was with them for up to 14 hours a day. During that time I never saw or heard anything that gave me cause for concern.

Thats some holiday you had there Clarence from your previous job.
You must have hated all that time off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarence who packed his job in instantly after being asked to work as the mccanns spokesman said this,</p>
<p>Mr Mitchell, who spent a month with the couple in Portugal after Madeleine went missing on May 3, said: “Sometimes I was with them for up to 14 hours a day. During that time I never saw or heard anything that gave me cause for concern.</p>
<p>Thats some holiday you had there Clarence from your previous job.<br />
You must have hated all that time off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
