<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Malhi Sees, Francisco Marco&#8217;s Maddy Dolls And Gerry McCann Returns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wanderer</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107740</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 02:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107740</guid>
		<description>http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/0311_maddie.shtml

NoTW- A shower curtain, bag, and clothing. And the Mafia, naturally.  It is interesting news if true, the shower curtain, bag, and clothing bit. One thing I don't agree with is this bit: 

"They have done it near Faro which could imply they have gone in the direction of the airport. It backs up the idea she was abducted."

Well, the DNA would be another spark in that direction, not the proximity to an airport, surely? That would be more, "kidnapped to order" or something, right? 

Lots of stories coming out today, well, there are everyday, but these at least have some different information/theories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/0311_maddie.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/0311_maddie.shtml</a></p>
<p>NoTW- A shower curtain, bag, and clothing. And the Mafia, naturally.  It is interesting news if true, the shower curtain, bag, and clothing bit. One thing I don&#8217;t agree with is this bit: </p>
<p>&#8220;They have done it near Faro which could imply they have gone in the direction of the airport. It backs up the idea she was abducted.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, the DNA would be another spark in that direction, not the proximity to an airport, surely? That would be more, &#8220;kidnapped to order&#8221; or something, right? </p>
<p>Lots of stories coming out today, well, there are everyday, but these at least have some different information/theories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacquescousteau</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107705</link>
		<dc:creator>jacquescousteau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 01:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107705</guid>
		<description>Been thinking...I've been against the Mccanns it's true - for their neglect, but put that away... if they did it how? I just can't see how - if the DNA evidence is correct and they transported her body in a hire car 25 days later - where did they keep the keep the body? How did they hide it so quickly in such a way they could recover it later? How did they transport and dispose of  it under the glare of the media? Where did they dispose of it when there car movements have been analysed by cctv? If they did it they must be criminal masterminds 

Has anyone got any plausible explanations as to how the Mccanns did it? Otherwise I think we all have to accept they didn't do it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been thinking&#8230;I&#8217;ve been against the Mccanns it&#8217;s true - for their neglect, but put that away&#8230; if they did it how? I just can&#8217;t see how - if the DNA evidence is correct and they transported her body in a hire car 25 days later - where did they keep the keep the body? How did they hide it so quickly in such a way they could recover it later? How did they transport and dispose of  it under the glare of the media? Where did they dispose of it when there car movements have been analysed by cctv? If they did it they must be criminal masterminds </p>
<p>Has anyone got any plausible explanations as to how the Mccanns did it? Otherwise I think we all have to accept they didn&#8217;t do it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ade</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107614</link>
		<dc:creator>Ade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107614</guid>
		<description>i'm confused - which thread is latest? Off to bed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m confused - which thread is latest? Off to bed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ade</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107600</link>
		<dc:creator>Ade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107600</guid>
		<description>1301 remigius
yep - my initial reason for dismissing Baby Grace was the decomposition time scale of several months and not several weeks. I agree there may be slowing down of rate of decomposition and it could be difficult to apply the "normal" methods to establish time scales. 
Having read the detailed info in the copy of the forensics book (that one may expect a suspect to take on holiday with them) this may or may not have been obvious to them either. 
Indeed a faster rate of decomposition would be the preferred option if it were intended that the body (in a state suitable for positive forensic examination) would never be found. 
As I mentioned before, this all goes wrong if a third party disposal accomplice does not follow instructions for some reason. A steralite box seems to be the perfect vessel to transport around a small body with the minimum of leaks, odours etc and its shape is not like a carpet bagger's normal fare.
It would probably fit into a chest freezer too - so no need to be reminded of a small hand or foot poking out of a bin bag.
Just an idea, of course for my next murder novel ha ha ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1301 remigius<br />
yep - my initial reason for dismissing Baby Grace was the decomposition time scale of several months and not several weeks. I agree there may be slowing down of rate of decomposition and it could be difficult to apply the &#8220;normal&#8221; methods to establish time scales.<br />
Having read the detailed info in the copy of the forensics book (that one may expect a suspect to take on holiday with them) this may or may not have been obvious to them either.<br />
Indeed a faster rate of decomposition would be the preferred option if it were intended that the body (in a state suitable for positive forensic examination) would never be found.<br />
As I mentioned before, this all goes wrong if a third party disposal accomplice does not follow instructions for some reason. A steralite box seems to be the perfect vessel to transport around a small body with the minimum of leaks, odours etc and its shape is not like a carpet bagger&#8217;s normal fare.<br />
It would probably fit into a chest freezer too - so no need to be reminded of a small hand or foot poking out of a bin bag.<br />
Just an idea, of course for my next murder novel ha ha <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ade</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107590</link>
		<dc:creator>Ade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107590</guid>
		<description>chenier/tony b...
I\'d take that daily mail  leicestershire police stuff with a pinch of salt. we have heard this story before a couple of weeks ago. I reckon the Comical One has been onto the mail to get something pro-McConn in the rag to balance out the \"they are nailed by DNA\" story that the mail ran recently. I bet the editor didn\'t know about the latter or he would have stopped it...
two more suspects sounds like the dragnet is closing in...
exciting fun, to say the least... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chenier/tony b&#8230;<br />
I\&#8217;d take that daily mail  leicestershire police stuff with a pinch of salt. we have heard this story before a couple of weeks ago. I reckon the Comical One has been onto the mail to get something pro-McConn in the rag to balance out the \&#8221;they are nailed by DNA\&#8221; story that the mail ran recently. I bet the editor didn\&#8217;t know about the latter or he would have stopped it&#8230;<br />
two more suspects sounds like the dragnet is closing in&#8230;<br />
exciting fun, to say the least&#8230; <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107118</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 13:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107118</guid>
		<description>1311 amused

Very interesting article, yes. And you're correct in the conclusion my mother 'had a lot of balls'. She still has and on occasion I'm still cringing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1311 amused</p>
<p>Very interesting article, yes. And you&#8217;re correct in the conclusion my mother &#8216;had a lot of balls&#8217;. She still has and on occasion I&#8217;m still cringing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107032</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107032</guid>
		<description>interesting read:

http://tapestrytalks.typed.com/tapestry-talks/2007/09/the-mccans-nee.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting read:</p>
<p><a href="http://tapestrytalks.typed.com/tapestry-talks/2007/09/the-mccans-nee.html" rel="nofollow">http://tapestrytalks.typed.com/tapestry-talks/2007/09/the-mccans-nee.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Bystander</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107029</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Bystander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-107029</guid>
		<description>True, Louise. Your mother had a lot of balls. I wish we all did. Interesting article, isn't it though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, Louise. Your mother had a lot of balls. I wish we all did. Interesting article, isn&#8217;t it though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106988</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 10:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106988</guid>
		<description>1308 amused

Re: the recent sighting

I cannot believe that this Morroccan woman was SO close she could see the distinctive iris of an eye and not attempt to grab the child. Does Madeleine have to be asked to be saved before any of these people ACT at the moment she is allegedly spotted?

If Madeleine is still alive, and I pray she is (if she is not being harmed or mistreated) what would it take for a member of the public to get involved at the time of the sighting?

When i was younger, if my mother heard a distressed child when we were out and about, she would approach the child and say 'is this your mummy/daddy?'. I used to cringe with embarassment, especially if she got a mouthful of abuse from the adult with the child. She still does it now. It certainly made me more aware of the possibility children could be harmed by strangers.

I wish more people would act in a similar fashion to my mother. ACT immediately not weeks later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1308 amused</p>
<p>Re: the recent sighting</p>
<p>I cannot believe that this Morroccan woman was SO close she could see the distinctive iris of an eye and not attempt to grab the child. Does Madeleine have to be asked to be saved before any of these people ACT at the moment she is allegedly spotted?</p>
<p>If Madeleine is still alive, and I pray she is (if she is not being harmed or mistreated) what would it take for a member of the public to get involved at the time of the sighting?</p>
<p>When i was younger, if my mother heard a distressed child when we were out and about, she would approach the child and say &#8216;is this your mummy/daddy?&#8217;. I used to cringe with embarassment, especially if she got a mouthful of abuse from the adult with the child. She still does it now. It certainly made me more aware of the possibility children could be harmed by strangers.</p>
<p>I wish more people would act in a similar fashion to my mother. ACT immediately not weeks later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Bystander</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106903</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Bystander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 09:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106903</guid>
		<description>Sorry! Above post posted in wrong thread!! See today's thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry! Above post posted in wrong thread!! See today&#8217;s thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused Bystander</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106897</link>
		<dc:creator>Amused Bystander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 09:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106897</guid>
		<description>Interesting news article: http://tinyurl.com/2w4an2

Please read this article thoughtfully and carefully. I would ask you, whatever your point of view, to keep an open mind until you have finished the article. And don't be put off by its apparently bigoted beginning. For even the most hardened believers in the McCanns' implication in the supposed death of Madeleine, I think it will give pause for thought.

Ian, I don't know if I'll have time to address your points today. Don't worry, I'm not dodging the issue. But I think that they will probably require a somewhat lengthy response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting news article: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2w4an2" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2w4an2</a></p>
<p>Please read this article thoughtfully and carefully. I would ask you, whatever your point of view, to keep an open mind until you have finished the article. And don&#8217;t be put off by its apparently bigoted beginning. For even the most hardened believers in the McCanns&#8217; implication in the supposed death of Madeleine, I think it will give pause for thought.</p>
<p>Ian, I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;ll have time to address your points today. Don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;m not dodging the issue. But I think that they will probably require a somewhat lengthy response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter O</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106853</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 08:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106853</guid>
		<description>1273 Butterfly Says: 
I can also say that people in the organisation fear that family.  Edit….
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Butterfly – I rarely find myself in agreement with posters like ALEXIS, but on matters such as this, I do..

Either name organisations, sources etc or stop with these accusations.  It’s just more gossip, rumour an innuendo otherwise and heaven knows this case has had far too much of this already.

If you don’t want to post as yourself, just post once under a fictitious name, maybe on another blog tomorrow.  If you don’t want to do that, send your information in a plain brown envelope to someone like 24Horas.  If you quote ‘reliable’ sources, I’m sure they’ll print it and then the British media will probably publish it by referring to something like scandalous allegations in that Johnny Foreigner press!  It would certainly get discussed in forums such as these!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1273 Butterfly Says:<br />
I can also say that people in the organisation fear that family.  Edit….<br />
+++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>Butterfly – I rarely find myself in agreement with posters like ALEXIS, but on matters such as this, I do..</p>
<p>Either name organisations, sources etc or stop with these accusations.  It’s just more gossip, rumour an innuendo otherwise and heaven knows this case has had far too much of this already.</p>
<p>If you don’t want to post as yourself, just post once under a fictitious name, maybe on another blog tomorrow.  If you don’t want to do that, send your information in a plain brown envelope to someone like 24Horas.  If you quote ‘reliable’ sources, I’m sure they’ll print it and then the British media will probably publish it by referring to something like scandalous allegations in that Johnny Foreigner press!  It would certainly get discussed in forums such as these!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remigius</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106814</link>
		<dc:creator>Remigius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 06:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106814</guid>
		<description>1305 Andrew

And Stevo, Ian, Patch

I made a long-distance tel-call tonight to the Galveston Sheriff's office.  Spoke with a brusque female deputy.  I asked her whether they knew about Madeleine McCann who'd gone missing in Portugal, and about how very similar in build and color she seemed to be to the little girl who'd recently washed up on the Texas island beach.  She immediately became very official and tight-lipped, said "They know about it.  They're working on it."  I asked whether the Texas police had made any conclusions, and she said, "not yet," but added that she really couldn't discuss it with me.

Who knows?  But it is a very interesting development, for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1305 Andrew</p>
<p>And Stevo, Ian, Patch</p>
<p>I made a long-distance tel-call tonight to the Galveston Sheriff&#8217;s office.  Spoke with a brusque female deputy.  I asked her whether they knew about Madeleine McCann who&#8217;d gone missing in Portugal, and about how very similar in build and color she seemed to be to the little girl who&#8217;d recently washed up on the Texas island beach.  She immediately became very official and tight-lipped, said &#8220;They know about it.  They&#8217;re working on it.&#8221;  I asked whether the Texas police had made any conclusions, and she said, &#8220;not yet,&#8221; but added that she really couldn&#8217;t discuss it with me.</p>
<p>Who knows?  But it is a very interesting development, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106811</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106811</guid>
		<description>1303 luckily in law, repetition is no defence! See you later McCanns!! Guilty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1303 luckily in law, repetition is no defence! See you later McCanns!! Guilty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remigius</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106810</link>
		<dc:creator>Remigius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106810</guid>
		<description>1238 Ade

http://www.myfoxhouston.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=4819818&#38;version=10&#38;locale=EN-US&#38;layoutCode=TSTY&#38;pageId=3.2.1

Check out the mother-daughter look-alike pink cardigans, similar to the one kate was wearing when the PJ gave her arguido status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1238 Ade</p>
<p><a href="http://www.myfoxhouston.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=4819818&amp;version=10&amp;locale=EN-US&amp;layoutCode=TSTY&amp;pageId=3.2.1" rel="nofollow">http://www.myfoxhouston.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=4819818&amp;version=10&amp;locale=EN-US&amp;layoutCode=TSTY&amp;pageId=3.2.1</a></p>
<p>Check out the mother-daughter look-alike pink cardigans, similar to the one kate was wearing when the PJ gave her arguido status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hideki</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106808</link>
		<dc:creator>Hideki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106808</guid>
		<description>247
Alexis:
"The McCanns on the other hand felt at that time that they had a system in order, not unlike that provided by the hotel itself."

You pro-McCann people never tire of repeating the same argument. I wonder how this argument will do in a court-room? You are not really arguing that there is no neglect (though you pretend to be doing so) -- rather, you are arguing that there are mitigating factors. 

One such factor might be that the hotel provided a system of checking in on children who were unattended.

"not unlike"? -- ! Was the Tapas9 checking  similar in some respects?  Maybe. Was it the same system as the hotel? NO

"That was error of judgement."
No, it was extremely neglectful to leave toddlers, including 2 year olds, alone with the doors unlocked, for periods of 3 hours, on a nightly basis. 

"Now we can all look back in hind sight and criticise..."

Part of reality in the courtroom is that when child neglect results in harm, or in death, the penalties are stiffer, and mitigating factors are given a harder look.  Your argument is that if nothing had happened, we would not be accusing the McCanns of neglect. That's only true because the neglect would not have come to our attention. So your argument is another way of saying that child neglect laws should not be enforced. 

"...but did anybody contact the hotel prior to the alleged abduction and state their concerns for the system in place ,which was advertised on the website and copied by the McCanns and their friends?"

This is a separate issue; is such a system proper and/or legal? However, your claim that the McCanns "copied" this system is bogus and totally unsubstantiated. 

You would have to show that with the hotel system:
1) those doing the checking were consuming alcohol between checks
2) the doors were unlocked so that staff did not need a key
3) 2 year olds were also welcome in the system
4) there was no independent supervision of checkers
5) no records were kept of checks made
etc etc.

Clearly, the hotel system, however minimal, provided far more security than the McCanns informal checking, which involved a 120 meter walk to an apartment full of kids (which, BTW, the Tapas9 lied about for some reason). 

Moreover, the hotel also provided creche and babysitting services. 

I would be curious about the status of such hotel "monitoring" systems, though. Probably , major resorts will review them and perhaps insist that all services provide a human presence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>247<br />
Alexis:<br />
&#8220;The McCanns on the other hand felt at that time that they had a system in order, not unlike that provided by the hotel itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>You pro-McCann people never tire of repeating the same argument. I wonder how this argument will do in a court-room? You are not really arguing that there is no neglect (though you pretend to be doing so) &#8212; rather, you are arguing that there are mitigating factors. </p>
<p>One such factor might be that the hotel provided a system of checking in on children who were unattended.</p>
<p>&#8220;not unlike&#8221;? &#8212; ! Was the Tapas9 checking  similar in some respects?  Maybe. Was it the same system as the hotel? NO</p>
<p>&#8220;That was error of judgement.&#8221;<br />
No, it was extremely neglectful to leave toddlers, including 2 year olds, alone with the doors unlocked, for periods of 3 hours, on a nightly basis. </p>
<p>&#8220;Now we can all look back in hind sight and criticise&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Part of reality in the courtroom is that when child neglect results in harm, or in death, the penalties are stiffer, and mitigating factors are given a harder look.  Your argument is that if nothing had happened, we would not be accusing the McCanns of neglect. That&#8217;s only true because the neglect would not have come to our attention. So your argument is another way of saying that child neglect laws should not be enforced. </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;but did anybody contact the hotel prior to the alleged abduction and state their concerns for the system in place ,which was advertised on the website and copied by the McCanns and their friends?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a separate issue; is such a system proper and/or legal? However, your claim that the McCanns &#8220;copied&#8221; this system is bogus and totally unsubstantiated. </p>
<p>You would have to show that with the hotel system:<br />
1) those doing the checking were consuming alcohol between checks<br />
2) the doors were unlocked so that staff did not need a key<br />
3) 2 year olds were also welcome in the system<br />
4) there was no independent supervision of checkers<br />
5) no records were kept of checks made<br />
etc etc.</p>
<p>Clearly, the hotel system, however minimal, provided far more security than the McCanns informal checking, which involved a 120 meter walk to an apartment full of kids (which, BTW, the Tapas9 lied about for some reason). </p>
<p>Moreover, the hotel also provided creche and babysitting services. </p>
<p>I would be curious about the status of such hotel &#8220;monitoring&#8221; systems, though. Probably , major resorts will review them and perhaps insist that all services provide a human presence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remigius</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106807</link>
		<dc:creator>Remigius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106807</guid>
		<description>508 Stevo

If the Anorakers every do get to Portugal, we'll have to take the PJ cops out for a long, boozy lunch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>508 Stevo</p>
<p>If the Anorakers every do get to Portugal, we&#8217;ll have to take the PJ cops out for a long, boozy lunch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hideki</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106805</link>
		<dc:creator>Hideki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106805</guid>
		<description>1298
Kris Says: 
"Is that Bozo Ian gone, I hope? Maybe his kids turned in early, so he went with them! He seems one of those unbearably clinging parents who drives their kids batty."

This is more unacceptable personal attack. Stevo was right to ask the administrators to ban such posters from this forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1298<br />
Kris Says:<br />
&#8220;Is that Bozo Ian gone, I hope? Maybe his kids turned in early, so he went with them! He seems one of those unbearably clinging parents who drives their kids batty.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is more unacceptable personal attack. Stevo was right to ask the administrators to ban such posters from this forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remigius</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106803</link>
		<dc:creator>Remigius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106803</guid>
		<description>1238 Ade

If they'd frozen or kept the body cold for a number of weeks before tossing it at sea, this would have slowed down the decomposition considerably.  And then the salt water would also have slowed down the decomposition.  So a forensic pathologist might have trouble determining how long ago she'd died.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1238 Ade</p>
<p>If they&#8217;d frozen or kept the body cold for a number of weeks before tossing it at sea, this would have slowed down the decomposition considerably.  And then the salt water would also have slowed down the decomposition.  So a forensic pathologist might have trouble determining how long ago she&#8217;d died.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remigius</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106799</link>
		<dc:creator>Remigius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/177323.html#comment-106799</guid>
		<description>1238 Ade

It sure looks like her, but they'll have to check the dna to be sure.

Texas has the death penalty for murder.  I wonder whether the body washing up on the Texas coast would give them jurisdiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1238 Ade</p>
<p>It sure looks like her, but they&#8217;ll have to check the dna to be sure.</p>
<p>Texas has the death penalty for murder.  I wonder whether the body washing up on the Texas coast would give them jurisdiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
