Madeleine McCann: Tea With Sympathy, Bosnia And ‘A Sinister Higher Force’
MADDY WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY EXPRESS page 7: “Little Bosnian girl they thought was Madeleine”
They? It was one man from Ireland, on a visit to a Catholic shrine in Bosnia, who saw Madeleine in a car crying for her daddy
A police spokesman says: “The car and occupants were just as described by the Irish pilgrim, except the little girl was not Madeleine McCann.”
But she was crying for her daddy. Not her mummy. Sure it’s not Madeleine?
Police go on: “The owner confirmed the car we lent to his son, who was with his daughter, who is very much like Madeleine”
Says Alan Dedic of his daughter Tea (blonde): “My daughter Tea was a bit out of control and I had to push her into the car… I wouldn’t dream I would create such a fuss”
“McCanns: New police snub” – The Portuguese public prosecutor will not let the McCanns see the files on them. Senior judges pay heed to the “special complexity” of this case. Robert Murat is not allowed to see his police files either
Says Clarence Mitchell: “All they have seen is so-called evidence that has been leaked to the Portuguese press and they don’t know what, if any, of that is true”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE – TRAGIC NEW THEORY”
Come, come. Don’t worry about how it is received. Tragic or magic, let’s have it…
A solicitor, London-based and reportedly working for one of the McCanns’ “holiday pals”, tells El Mundo newspaper, Spain: “I’m afraid these interventions have been prejudicial not only to my client, but also for determining the truth”
The Star says Gerry McCann is a “key Government medical advisor”. The Star’s theory is that “a sinister higher force” has stopped the truth from coming out
“Alert was sparked by ‘hyper’ lookaliake” – “It’s “hyerpactive lookalike” Tea Dedic
THE SUN page 7: “Balkans girl is not Maddie”
Says Mr Dedic of Tea: “She is hyperactive and I had to push her into the car” – Do social services know?
DAILY MIRROR page 9: “Despair at Maddy file secret”
Kate McCann is in “despair”. She cannot see the police files on her. “It has dashed their hopes,” says Clarence Mitchell. And the little girl on Bosnia? Not Madeleine…
DAILY MAIL page 49: “Yet another little girl who turned out not to be Maddie”
How many more? Can there be any more?
Slavko Dedic, Tea’s father – not be confused with the Express’ Alan Dedic – says his daughter was throwing a tantrum. And that his daughter cannot speak English
And for finding Tea we have the Daily Mail to thank. Says a police source: “After being given the car registration plate by the Daily Mail, Bosnian police went within the hour to an address in Ljubuski – and found the VW Golf”
But not Madeleine…
DAILY TELEGRAPH page 17: “Girl in Bosnia is no Madeleine”
“Strikingly similar,” says the caption beneath a shot of Tea Dedic, who is blonde and aged four
THE INDEPEDNT, THE GUARDIAN and THE TIMES: “No Madeleine news today
November 15th, 2007 at 7:44 am
Numero uno????
November 15th, 2007 at 7:45 am
What kind of inadequate tosser tries to get the first posting in? Me - that’s who.
November 15th, 2007 at 7:45 am
I’m on a roll here
November 15th, 2007 at 7:45 am
My own personal site
November 15th, 2007 at 7:46 am
Help - I feel lonely. Toni, come and comfort me.
November 15th, 2007 at 7:47 am
Am I the last person on earth?
November 15th, 2007 at 7:47 am
How will I further the species? Toni - help me out here
November 15th, 2007 at 7:48 am
Madeleine? Schmadeleine - I’m having to much fun to worry about her today.
November 15th, 2007 at 7:53 am
Morning Teddy, hopefully Toni will join you soon.
November 15th, 2007 at 7:55 am
hidekie
have look here re faking photo
http://forums.mirror.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=9782
November 15th, 2007 at 7:59 am
not sure if this possibility has been canvassed before or not. what if the PJ suspect GM and not KM?
we all know the PJ gave KM a pretty hard time during her interviews and put her under a lot of pressure. i think most of us assumed the PJ were hoping she would crack.
what if the PJ suspected GM and not KM? is it possible the PJ were deliberately pressuring KM in the hope that she might claim to be innocent and finger GM? if the PJ thought she was the weakest link it might make sense to try this approach.
there has not been much info released about what sort of questions the PJ put to GM.
info provided by Tony Bennett might indicate that GM may have had MM with him on the afternoon / evening of 3rd may. see below
231
Tony Bennett Says:
November 11th, 2007 at 6:52 pm
snip
The tennis issue and Gerry’s ‘no-show’ at the lesson booked are seen as vital when paired with the fact that Maddy’s whereabouts from 2.00pm the afternoon of May 3rd, are sketchy to say the least. It is possible that GM, Maddy and another female were spotted on CCTV at or near Bergau on the afternoon/evening of May 3rd - at a time when GM claimed to have been playing tennis.
snip
November 15th, 2007 at 8:02 am
3rd then
November 15th, 2007 at 8:03 am
They did it.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:10 am
they surely did.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:12 am
Morning all!! Beautiful day here in Knysna!! Where did Tony get his “Snip” from? I would like to have a look at the site?
November 15th, 2007 at 8:14 am
10
an observer
Very interesting.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:15 am
15
HARRY FORESIGHT Says:
————————————-
195
Harry Hind Sight Says:
November 10th, 2007 at 12:40 pm
I cannot say too much, but I have always found the Leciester Courts a difficult wicket to play - anything short of a length will be harshly dealt with, and that is before you even get out of the robing room what what hey hey
————————————————————-
very good of you to keep a weather eye on TB.
your are an officer and a gentleman
November 15th, 2007 at 8:15 am
This is a British site for British people - there’s nothing for you here.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:18 am
11
Observer, I don’t know. Someone stated before that it would be more likely for a husband to help cover up someone his wife had done (regarding the children), rather than the wife covering up for her husband (which, I agree with). I suppose if there was an accident (including drugs or something), it would put them on equal footing for covering up for one another.
If true, the lack of tennis is quite interesting.
(The rest of this is just a general comment)
This may have been brought up yesterday, please forgive me if it was, I realize why the police can’t question the McCanns now; but does that hold true for questioning the others (with the witness status)? Also, I wonder if there is any ‘evidence’ could make the other 4 suspects, even if they can’t further make connections directly to the McCanns. I imagine they are more stringent about it now, but surely the police would try to argue if someone isn’t ‘new enough’ or ’strong enough’ to question the McCanns, they could possibly still try to get one or two of the other four they wanted?
I know the evidence found for the new line of questioning wasn’t strong or new enough to question the McCanns again, so that may disprove the legitimacy of bringing in the other four friends; but I just think it may be possible for the police to still get to question one or two of the other four. No doubt they have looked into it or are looking into it but I haven’t seen that in the press (I could have missed it).
November 15th, 2007 at 8:21 am
16
Tracy Says:
—————–
dont get trampled by the pachyderms
nice part of the world
November 15th, 2007 at 8:25 am
Start a list, Harry.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:31 am
Why thank you kindly xxxxx
November 15th, 2007 at 8:37 am
Blimey O’Reilly you guys are slow this morning. Where are all the conspiricy loons and the DNA experts that so lighten my day with their absurd theories.
If you lot don’t get your fingers out and start posting some worthwhile bollocks I shall be forced to look elsewhere for my lunatics - BBC Parliament here I come.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:38 am
1107 Yesterday - Taybie the Saxon says (November 15th, 2007 at 12:14 am)
Tony Bennett/Tinsel/Innocent/Clarkeson
REPLIES INTERLEAVED
Taybie the Saxon: “Don’t you ever get the feeling that there is still a missing piece in the jigsaw, I mean something that hasn’t really been mooted yet? What if the McCanns really weren’t there at the time Maddy was taken, but they have a good idea who it was but daren’t say?”
REPLY: What I think is near certain is that Madeleine perished in the McCanns’ apartment. We have the evidence of the cadaver dogs - the cadaverine and the reports of blood. Still more relevantly, we have the reactions of the McCanns to this evidence, viz. coming up with strange explanations for these facts e.g. ‘I dealt with 6 corpses before coming on holiday’, or ‘I took Cuddle Cat to work’ etc. Now that doesn’t completely rule out someone else, as it were, having struck the fatal blow. But the McCanns’ own defensiveness and reaching for unbelievable explanations for cadaverine and blood in their apartment IMO points the finger in their direction. IMO cadaverine on Cuddle Cat suggests that Cuddle Cat was next to Madeleine’s dead body for a significant period of time. O’Brien’s tangled tale about needing extra sheets because his child was vomiting may be due to sheet being needed to wrap up Madeleine’s body
============
Taybie the Saxon: “That would explain the campaign (i.e. let’s go for max publicity and hope someone else finds her or stumbles on the truth) and also why the Tapas 7 hid (allegedly) on 3 May rather than venturing out?”
REPLY: Do you mean in the afternoon? It is some time since I’ve looked this up, but there were reports, especially in the early days, that the ‘Tapas 9′ started their drinking session at around 2pm. I have wondered ever since whether there was more to this alleged drinking session than meets the eye. If it is true that there was a group of the ‘Tapas 9′ together that afternoon, was either Gerry McCann or Kate McCann or both with them? Maybe others as well.
Or perhaps was one of the McCanns ‘looking after’ the children - bearing in mind that reports of the children being seen by third parties after 12.30pm that day are quite possibly unreliable. I think there are indications that Gerry and Kate McCann were NOT together that afternoon.
============
Taybie the Saxon: “And why the searching has always been delegated to others. Could this sinister force extend to planting DNA and cadaver evidence…”
REPLY: No
============
… and nobbling things within the PJ and/or over here?
REPLY: IMO there is the possibility that the British government is exerting an influence over the Leicestershire Police, the Birmingham Forensic Science Service and the PJ to discontinue the investigation into Madeleine’s ‘disappearance’. What was there to discuss between Gordon Brown and thee Portuguese leadership when they met at the Lisbon E.U. summit? - we know for a fact - it is on the recoerd - that Madeleine was discussed by Brown and Socrates. Why? To speed up and help the PJ’s investigation into a suspicious disappearance? Or to slow it down?
============
No, probably not, I’m just thinking out loud as Clarkeson sometimes does. Just that whatever happened, many many people have been fooled and we still don’t seem to be anywhere near the truth.
REPLY: There is IMO something about the characters of both Gerry and Kate McCann that gives them a strange ability to hoodwink people. For how long?
November 15th, 2007 at 8:40 am
Teddy Boy 26- conspiracy theory I found yesterday, not sure if it has been mentioned on here.
The Common Purpose group!!!!!
November 15th, 2007 at 8:40 am
Harry, I may call you Harry? Or would you prefer your full title of Harry (what a cunt) Foresight. Please drop the “What What” - it wasn’t funny when you first did it - and now it’s getting on my tits.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:40 am
I am wondering if anybody has discussed mummification in the sandy areas in PDL. Anybody with forensic knowledge would know how long to leave the body. People such as doctors.
Very quick decomposition. Easier to dig the bones up and chisel to look like other inconspicuous bones floating around with the flotsam and jetsam. Maybe a passing surgeon supervised Madeleine’s killer/s in how to do this.
Was a very simple best-selling medicine the cause? - Maybe causing disorientation in a child causing the child to fall down some steps. Causing a whole lot of people the world over to stop drugging their kids every night? - Thus causing Madeleine’s poor parents to have to suffer such a tirade of accusations. Thus causing a body to have to be ferried around from place to place?
Is a multi-national drug company terrified that it turned out that the original trials weren’t conducted properly? As if!
Is this why people are descending from very high from very early-on in May?
I’m sure that this could not possibly be so!
Gerry is my heart-specialist and a lovely guy. I have an appointment with him this month. I cannot cancel! Curiosity!
If I go missing for no particular reason please phone the police in PDL - because they will know exactly who has done me in - but they may not be able to find the evidence because of a forensic clean-up or somebody giving diversionary directives.
Heart specialists don’t kill people but sometimes they get it wrong. Ask Glenfield Hospital for their figures still not published.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:49 am
Calm down Teddy Boy. I like the what what.
November 15th, 2007 at 8:53 am
Don’t know what to think now. Just seen a photo of shoes Baby Grace was wearing, and also a photo of Maddie in almost the same sort of shoes. The pink tips turned up at toe.!!!!
November 15th, 2007 at 8:53 am
MADELEINE’S LAW - NEVER LEAVE YOUNG CHILDREN ON THEIR OWN - CHILDREN AND YOUNG PERSONS ACT 1933
Found this comment left on a *government* website earlier this year:
http://www.parentscentre.gov.uk
QUOTE
“Back to the McCanns and double standards…
“Anyone read about the man who had agreed to stay off work to look after his daughter while wife went away for the weekend… got called into work, left the five-year-old with food, locked indoors (watching T.V.?). She climbed out of the window to play in the rain, luckily she’s safe and he (bus driver) faces possible custodial sentence, lost his marriage, life with his daughter and possibly his job…
“His daughter was thankfully safe…but he’s another parent who thought it’d be O.K. to leave his child alone. Maybe if the McCanns and the authorities used Maddie’s plight to reinforce the message that leaving children is unacceptable, he’d still have his wife, family, home, job, freedom…”
UNQUOTE
That last thought is a good one.
So good it’s worth repeating.
Maybe if the McCanns and the authorities used Maddie’s plight to reinforce the message that leaving children is unacceptable…
More than once.
Maybe if the McCanns and the authorities used Maddie’s plight to reinforce the message that leaving children is unacceptable…
Madeleine’s law is alreday there. Children and Young Peresons Act 1933 - Section 1.
Let’s use it to prosecute neglectful parents.
Do the many McCann supporters on this site disagree with that?