Okay my concern is in the interview showing the physical replica pyjamas she was wearing and photographs of them later publicised… I don’t know about many of you but I wouldn’t remember exact clothing or where they were purchased from. The pyjamas in the picture didn’t look brand new they seemed freshly laundered and ironed… Were they similar pyjamas or exact replica pyjamas? If anyone can enlighten me about the pyjamas my mind will rest, if you agree with others I’ve mentioned it to, so be it but just thought I’d speak my mind for some food for thought. I may be totally way off as I’m not sure of all the facts but if I am right it raises a very interesting question! To me it just seemed they could be ‘THE’ pyjamas… If so, how would that be possible?

I’m not sure about your “toyboy” reference, but I have posted on the make-up issue a few times, saying that it was obvious, but others would not concur with me. So I thought I was the only one who thought this was important.

It is obvious that mascara and rouge are used. Also, hair dye and/or photo-shop alterations. I have seen the same picture (5th one in sequence above — the one with Madeleine in red dress) with long hair (that version picture is in one of the videoes linked above). So one then must ask: which is the “original” picture and why are the McCanns releasing two versions, one photo-shopped? My personal opinion is that the SHORT HAIR version is the original — it shows the make-up most clearly, the long hair hiding this…

Needless to say, either way , it shows the McCanns have been manipulating photos that they have presented to the public for identification purposes. Is this not inexcusable? The photos showing no coloboma were also said to be manipulated (according to Real Stig’s speculation).

So we have the FACT that the McCanns released VERY FEW recent photos of Madeleine, and of the photos released, many have been apparently altered. In spite of this, it remains evident that the McCanns applied make-up to girls of 2 and 3 years old, to make them look adult.

WHY?

There is no suggestion that they were entering the children in beauty contests. Was this just a “family custom”?

How abolut ‘findbrandon’ as a name for the website? I could use a million quid - bloody mortgage.

Great to see the mists clearing from the mirrors with your excellent summary of who is connected with whom. “Oh what tangled webs we weave…”

November 28th, 2007 at 3:24 am
VQ:

Lovely gentle Maria is a nice Spanish girl who thinks that Generalissimo Franco was a nice old man who loved the Church and his Country and had a good heart, and has been terribly misunderstood and unfairly treated by cynical critics.

yep, there’ been a slowdown . . but wait an hour or two and the early risers will join in.
sure hope Julie is among them.

I guess it is very late in UK. Its only 10:25 pm here.

Lovely gentle Maria is a nice Spanish girl who thinks that Generalissimo Franco was a nice old man who loved the Church and his Country and had a good heart, and has been terribly misunderstood and unfairly treated by cynical critics.

Doesn’t seem to be much traffice

If the PJ were only to visit the FSS lab and talk with local police, would they still need permission? Who the hell is running this show?