I would keep searching 4 her ‘cos I want her to always feel safe with me and my hubby…..

would not you…..?

(AND I HAVE NOT COPIED ANY OF THIS)

I would keep searching 4 her ‘cos I want her to always feel safe with me and my hubby…..

would not you…..?

Gerry : - ” ….a little more to the left do you think Kate ? ”

or Kate :- ” … should have been one of me on there too…”

To profile the McCann’s :it is doubtful they would seek solace in anything transcendental…They are of this world not the other….To believe they would submit to anything that would compromise them is sheer fantasy.
The clergy does not fit into this profile.

The priest is NOT allowed to give any information (especially if it was in the confessional) that Kate and Gerry McCann would have shared with him - the information (if any was given) is between God, the priest and Kate or Gerry McCann. If the priest did at anytime devulge any information, he would be ex-communicated by the church and my dears, it just is not done…. As a matter of fact, I would think the priest (like many journalists) would probably choose to go to jail. If the Portugal police are Catholic, they would be very aware of this.

I have been thinking about all the help which K and G M allegedly received from both business and political people. If it happened in my country, some would wonder whether they are freemasons. Though most freemasons are genuinely concerned with ethics, some have been known for interfering with the course of justice to their own advantage or to the advantage of fellow freemasons (fact not rumor). Their clout is strong because it is hidden therefore unknown to the public. And they”ll come to the rescue of another freemason whenever needed. Yet, most freemasons aren’t religious, far from it. There again, we can only surmise, for lack of knowledge.

Personnally, it’s true I don’t want to cast a stone at anyone, but I also want to know who is on the right side, because I have been disturbed by the unbelievable openly displayed xenophoby.

If the Home Office permits the re-interviews, then the McCanns can claim that the Government was trying to prove its even-handedness (a common charge against this government, of course ;)) . If the Home Office denies the re-interviews then the public can wonder whether the Government is “protecting its own”. Hand it over to Judge John Deede!

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1914972007

Why are all these millionaires queueing up to pay hundreds of thousands of pounds to the McCanns? Something is very, very, fishy about these payments. Has there been any explanation - if so, is it straightforward or something to do with Labour Party politics, yet again?

“Hideki, I do feel that your comments would carry more weight if you had bothered to find and read the essay before your original comments. ”

Not sure what you mean by my “original comments” In post 231 I wrote:

“I’ve also never read the full Anne Enright essay, but only excerpts, which I thought foolish-sounding. I wondered why she wrote that she would wake up in the morning once again believing the McCanns… I cannot give much credibility to anyone who wrote that, but as I said I did not get the context of the whole essay.”

I certainly did not intend for those comments to “carry any weight” at all — those are just my impressions of the excerpts published in news articles.

“And Anne Enright is not a journalist; she’s a novelist primarily fascinated by the extraordinary language used by the English participants in this case.Nobody paid any attention to that essay until Anne Enright won the Man Booker prize, whereupon assorted journos googled her and found her essay in the London Review of Books…”

I appreciate your providing the background.

329
Meejician Says:

“Hideki,I think that perhaps you’ve misinterpreted the AE piece. It was, in fact, a clever and very Irish essay about the way people gossip about this issue - sometimes exaggerating, sometimes totally convinced, but always mystified and needing to talk about it constantly, much as we all are and do.The last line is, of course, facetious and throw-away.”

Thank you for explaining. I think I did misinterpret it, and will try reading it more carefully. The first time I was put off by the style.

1103
Peter O Says:

1090 Hideki
“#IGNORE”

That you are ignoring the points I raised is not new information. Back in post 531, you ignored them when your sole remark was the very useful: “Hideki – Could you assist me please? Stand up when talking/typing. Your voice is muffled.” This followed your remark in post 178 : “No idea what point you’re trying to make Hideki?” followed by the ridiculous, unsubstantiated assertion:

“Lot’s of people here and elsewhere publish stories about the operation/existence if paedophile rings juxtaposed with Madeleine’s disappearance as “proof” that because one exists, the paedophile rings, that the latter, Madeleine, must therefore have been abducted by one.”

which turns out to mean nothing other than that Team McCann urgently wants the world to believe a paedophile ring is involved, even though they have not presented a single reason why they know this to be so. The McCanns have influenced the media and used Metodo3 to peddle this story to the public.

I think you DO have an idea what point I am making, Peter O, and that’s why you choose to ignore it. Good for you.

I may or may not have discussed politics and religion.

I hope I didn’t start any wars.

If I attempted to seduce anyone I am sorry.

Big glass of water.

Mr L is slumbering like a contented child.

My back hurts.

My head hurts.

Back to sleep.

++++++++++++++

You were wonderful!

#IGNORE

_________
REPLY: Could it simply mean they are not prejudging him?

+++++++++++++

If that were the case they would do the “decent thing” and not express an “opinion” in either direction. Accepting his nomination lends “tacit approval” to him.

Oh goodnight.~~! Maybe tomorrow either I, or Stevo, Will Explain It.

I don’t know, it’s related to Tony Bennet’s theory of the Very Strange lack of agreement in Madeleine birth date, etc. Ask me tomorrow, when this damned Apple Cider is out of my system.