Madeleine McCann: Robert Murat Investigates, Paedo Panic And A New Witness
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann.
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE – POLICE QUIZ WAITER FOR THIRD TIME – Tapas bar worker holds the key”
The Tapas One! Is he Jose Baptista, the Tapas Waiter? The Express says it is another waiter. The Tapas Two?
The Portuguese man is “said to have been the first person to see Kate McCann as she raised the alarm after discovering her daughter had gone missing from the family’s holiday apartment in Praia da Luz. He has allegedly given a dramatically different account of the events on May 3 from statements made by the McCanns and their friends”
Page 7: “Waiter’s evidence ‘will be trump card in police case against McCanns’” - Says the police? Says Metodo 3? No, says “a report”. One newspaper’s opinion is now another paper’s front-page news
Portuguese newspaper Diario de Noticias notes: “This waiter is a witness considered crucial to the investigation. The investigators want to find out about what happened during dinner – the conversations and the McCanns’ behaviour as well as their alleged trips to the apartment. The employee still insists it is not true that the child’s parents checked their children every half hour”
Kate McCann is a “39-year-old GP” – Such are the facts
Baptista told investigators that Kate screamed: “They’ve taken her. They’ve taken her” when she discovered Madeleine gone
Says McCann spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “Kate has consistently and categorically absolutely denied she said that on the verandah. She may have said it at some stage as a general remark, but she did not run out with this phrase. Whoever this guy is, and if he is saying this, he is either making it up or he is mistaken. Kate, Gerry and their friends told the truth. They will continue to maintain their stories, because it is the truth. Whatever this guy is saying we reject it – it is not true”
DAILY STAR front page: “MADDIE: WE FIND MISSING WITNESS – REAL breakthrough as first man at scene tells all”
There is “BOMBSHELL evidence from a tapas bar waiter. And the Star has found him. Only it can’t name him. It found him in the pages of the Portuguese newspaper. And as soon as they have named him you can rest assured the Star will reveal the results of its investigation to its readers
DAILY MAIL front page: “MADELEINE – Murat sat in as police questioned Tapas Nine”
Page 7: “Murat, translator for the Tapas Nine – Friends of the McCanns reacted with disbelief and anger to the news. There were also fears that Mr Murat could have influenced the police’s understanding of the statements of the Tapas Nine”
But Murat didn’t meet all the Tapas Nine with the police, just Rachael Oldfield and Dianne Webster, the mother of Fiona Payne, who was at the Ocean Club’s tapas restaurant with the McCanns that night. A misleading headline?
Says Murat’s lawyer: “My client did not preside over police interviews of multiple witnesses. The only interview of which he translated was that of Dianne Webster”
Says one of the McCanns’ friends: “It beggars belief. It’s absolutely outrageous that someone who a few days later is declared an arguido was aware of much of what initial witnesses said” – Murat was later named a suspect. He was not a suspect at the time on his translating. Just as the McCanns would surely have been given some information on the case, and they were later named as suspects
“This disgusting soap opera, by suspect’s lover” – Michaela Walczuch says her “ordeal” is a “stupid, disgusting soap opera”
THE SUN front page: “MADDIE SHAMBLES – Daft police let suspect translate during quiz of Tapas 7 – SHE DESERVES BETTER”
But Robert Murat was not a suspect when he sat in as a translator in an interview with one member of the Tapas Seven/Tapas Nine. But then, who’s counting? Not the Sun…
Pages 4 and 5: “MADDIE COPS’ SHOCKING MURAT BUNGLE” – In allowing a man with no previous form to sit in on interviews with his countrymen, the so-called Tapas Seven, the Tapas Nine, the Tapas Two? Such are the Sun’s facts
Murat the helpful translator? The Sun: Murat the “oddball Brit expat”
A friend of the Tapas 7 says: “They are all furious – they thought Murat was a legitimate part of the investigation. He infiltrated himself and was privy to what was said by many of the key players. It’s just the sort of information a suspect would want. It beggars belief. Portuguese police have made mistake after mistake. This just adds to the list”
A source says: “It compromises an investigation when someone who turns out to be a suspect is given intimate details of what witnesses are saying. These are some of the people who have blown apart his alibi, yet police have allowed him to listen to them giving their evidence. He was not present when Rachael told police she had seen him on the night, but she gave plenty of details that would be handy for him”
Blown apart his alibi? Not according to his lawyer, or his mother…
“Family Xmas vigil at church” – “The McCanns plan to spend much of Christmas in church praying for Maddie. Kate and Gerry will be attending the midnight mass on Christmas Eve. They will also go to an earlier special children’s service with their twins Amelie and Sean, two”
How does the Sun know this? Say the McCanns: “We plan to have a very quiet, private Christmas with family in the UK.” But if the press know their movements in advance, surely they will be there to watch. What chance of quiet?
DAILY MIRROR front page: “McCANNS SHOCK – MURAT HELPED COPS QUIZ TAPAS 7″
“EXCLUSIVE” news on the Tapas 7
Page 4: “’People just don’t feel like celebrating Christmas..it’s all about keeping our children close rather than razzle dazzle,” says Gwyneth Green who runs a flower shop in Rothley, where the McCanns live
Increase the fear. Spread the anxiety
But Madeleine McCann went missing in Portugal, not in Leicestershire. But in Rothley “celebrations have been more subtle and sedate as people worry for the lost little girl”
Says the Mirror: “Around the trunks yellow ribbons, now faded and frayed, hand rigid in the frosty air”
The Mirror no longer equips its masthead with yellow ribbon.

December 17th, 2007 at 8:40 am
‘Says McCann spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “Kate has consistently and categorically absolutely denied she said that on the verandah. She may have said it at some stage as a general remark, but she did not run out with this phrase. Whoever this guy is, and if he is saying this, he is either making it up or he is mistaken. Kate, Gerry and their friends told the truth. They will continue to maintain their stories’
A very rattled Clarence! So if he says the world is not flat, he is ‘mistaken’ or ‘is telling lies’ whereas if the holy pair say anything at all it is ‘truth’….
December 17th, 2007 at 8:42 am
Ian - its absolutley ludicrous -
December 17th, 2007 at 8:44 am
Does Clarence think the more words he uses the more we will believe?
It always makes me smile when people say ‘Consistantly’ as if it proves truth - if you keep saying something it ‘becomes’ the truth!
Interesting change there though, she denies she said it ‘on the verandah’ - note that she doesnt deny actually saying it and he doesnt attempt to say she said it ‘in the frantic nature of the moment’.
December 17th, 2007 at 8:44 am
lol! Morning nosey!
December 17th, 2007 at 8:51 am
A lot of beggering of belief going on in the papers - and they still bang on with the fanning of the ‘bungling foreigners’ campaign!
Maybe Gordon Browns bungling government is running the PJ?
December 17th, 2007 at 8:51 am
Odd how Clarence can always be so confident that the McCs are telling the truth when, so far as I am aware, he was not on the scene.
December 17th, 2007 at 8:51 am
Echo….echo….. echo…….. echo……..
December 17th, 2007 at 8:52 am
clarry is justifyably upset - team mcc’s thoughtfully produced media campaign leading up to christmas has been blown by this bleeping witness.
Clarry gave the press -
an article by Jes’s wife,
an article by an investigative journalist (i use this term loosely) and
various press releases including :
the McC twins wanting Maddie back for christmas.
Maddies liking for H Potter & Dr Who (wow my 9 year old is scared of Dr Who)
Dr’s Mcc plans to spend christmas in church
etc etc
All carefully picturing the perfect family trying to balance their grief with the needs of their children, spending time praying at church - hoping for a miracle. Designed to bring a tear of sympathy to even the most doubtful observers eye.
And what happens - this SO CALLED WITNESS gets reinterveiwed by the pj someone notifies the press. This interupts Team Mccanns media cycle. Nobody asked Clarrie if it was OK to print this article. Why not?
Life is SSOOO unfair - isn’t it clarrie?

December 17th, 2007 at 8:53 am
It’s strange how worried they are about the verandah allegations. It doesn’t really alter much so why are they so concerned? Is it that they are worried about other information the waiter has given and want to completely discredit him? I’d love to know why there are such discrepancies in what Tapas bar staff have said. Have any of them been told what to say by ???
December 17th, 2007 at 8:53 am
morning Ian
December 17th, 2007 at 8:53 am
6 May
Dont forget he is being paid to speak, therefore Clarence = Gerry.
This means nothing he says is of any consequence, its the suspects speaking. They should keep their suspect mouths shut.
December 17th, 2007 at 8:53 am
You will have noted the trademark word ‘ludicrous’ front up within DJS Sunday Times article: …the accusations against them are ludicrous and a cruel distraction from the search…..
December 17th, 2007 at 8:55 am
12 Jez - yes ‘ludicrous’ stuck out like a sore thumb!
What’s Clarries pen name?
December 17th, 2007 at 8:56 am
8 nosey
It doesnt create a picture of a normal family in my mind! I think my family are pretty normal and nobody will be going near a church!
We do like Doctor Wo and Harry Potter though (but all of us are over 15!!).
I admit my nephew likes Doctor Who and he is only 7 - though I think its not really him but his DADDY that likes Dr Who!!!
December 17th, 2007 at 8:56 am
6
May Says:
December 17th, 2007 at 8:51 am
Odd how Clarence can always be so confident that the McCs are telling the truth when, so far as I am aware, he was not on the scene.
****************************************************
Exactly !! Like everyone else connected with the Fragrant Pair and their cohorts, he can only go on what he has been told and I have piles of that in my meadow where good old “Charlie” , the ancient nag, has left them !!
December 17th, 2007 at 8:56 am
11 Ian - if they kept their mouths shut - it would not be so much fun.
So please keep talking CM et al..
December 17th, 2007 at 8:56 am
Morning all.
They will continue to maintain their stories’
——————————————————————————————————————————
I can’t help smiling when Clarence uses the word ’stories’.
Surely if they are suposed to be factual then ‘account’ or ‘ statement’ would be more appropriate.
December 17th, 2007 at 8:58 am
Do you think Gordon Brown regularly frequents this site? To get an idea of how public opinion’s going?
December 17th, 2007 at 8:58 am
12 Jez
Indeed! Plus he got it all wrong again, with one of the T9 leaving to check the kids at the time they were supposed to have been arriving!
Denying inconsistancies and introducing new ones - and these people are supposed to be professionals!
December 17th, 2007 at 8:59 am
ian - obviousley no members of your family are:
a) planning to run for sainthood/ public office
b) looking to start a high profile career in the ‘missing children’ market
lol
December 17th, 2007 at 8:59 am
Having lurked here for months and months I have to ask “How come it is a ludicrous etc. situation where a man is asked to interpret, for one witness, who subsequently becomes a suspect, and how the McCann’s, who are suspects, are allowed and supported when they get together with all of the witnesses in a secret location to discuss the case?
December 17th, 2007 at 9:00 am
Logic - when did Gordie learn to read?
December 17th, 2007 at 9:01 am
18 Logic. Like all politicians, why would he give a damn until nearer an election?
16 True! But I wish he’d be more interesting and not, like the pro-mccanners, just attack and deny. It would be good to hear some backed up logical argument wouldnt it!
17 They only have ’stories’!
December 17th, 2007 at 9:03 am
20 Our place is already assured of course!
We jsut invented a new type of god, this one comes to the house.
December 17th, 2007 at 9:04 am
23 Serious point by the way!
December 17th, 2007 at 9:04 am
I would think Clarence’s career will have spiralled downwards by the end of all this. He never was very successful apparently and I can’t see Gordon being able to have him back as a credible media adviser after this, although this may have been the plan to begin with. And the (?double glazing) chap who’s paying his salary at the moment might want to think twice about whether Clarence can really be an asset to him, since the public sees him as such an ass. I really could never understand how he managed to get on TV in the first place with such a paucity of charisma and intellect.
December 17th, 2007 at 9:05 am
9 logic - apparently this is the same waiter that says the Tapas 7/9/10 downed 14 bottles of wine that evening + cocktails - which they also deny.
Do you think thats whats upsetting them?
(I personnaly don’t care how much they drank - they were on holiday - but it does taint their image somewhat)
December 17th, 2007 at 9:05 am
21 scotfree
Exactly.
December 17th, 2007 at 9:09 am
25 He does have media contacts, but thats about it - the guy is a joke. But then again, just because Kennedy has made lots of money doesnt make him intelligent does it? There are many many people with pretty dull intellects that make plenty of money. Barrow boys. Buy cheaper than they sell = profit.
December 17th, 2007 at 9:13 am
I ownder hy they are trying to make old new - new news again? Seeking to discredit the original statmeents and therefore change their statements?