Madeleine McCann: Gerry McCann Talks With Vanity Fair
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR front page: “MADELEINE: THE BIG INTERVIEW”
“Our regret”
“GERRY: I wish we have never gone to the tapas bar”
“KATE: I wish I’d seen the stranger watching us”
“READ THEIR HEARTBREAKING WORDS INSIDE”
Voyeurs, campaigners, police and handwringers come see the pain, the suffering the agony. Prepare to be heartbroken!
“Riddled with guilt, the distraught” Gerry will tell all to the Mirror. Well, not to the Mirror, rather to Vanity Fair magazine. Journalist Judy Bachrach spoke with Gerry in October near the family home in Rothley, Leicestershire
And the interview is not with Gerry and Kate. Only Gerry McCann was interviewed, says the Mail. Kate McCann’s words come via friends and family
Pages 4 and 5: “I WISH”.
It reads very much like a prayer, or a camping speech by Barack Obama. Says Gerry McCann:
“I wish I hadn’t gone to the tapas bar.
“I wish I’d have stayed in the apartment that night
“I wish I’d stayed in the room when I checked on her five minutes longer”
A wish…
Says Gerry McCann: “”At the time we did it, it was not irresponsible. Of course we feel guilty about not having been there and that is just something we have to deal with for the rest of our lives. You are not asking anything we don’t think about on a daily basis. We live this 24 hours a day”
Gerry says his world went “all black, with maybe tiny points of light” in the days after Madeleine vanished. “We can’t cry our eyes out every day because that’s not helping. So after three days I picked myself up…quicker than Kate could. Grief washes over you. It’s like a big wave, mostly I was able to beat it back”
And the Madeleine ‘Look into my eyes’ campaign? Says Gerry: “We thought it was possible this could hurt her. Her abductor might do something to her eye. But in marketing terms it was a good ploy”
THE SUN: “Life’s bleak but I cling to hope”
Says Gerry McCann: “People can support you in your darkest hours and in our case the darkest hour was of course when Madeleine went missing. Now it is just bleak”
In next month’s Vanity Fair: “The interview with Gerry came as it emerged GORDON BROWN has snubbed the McCanns’ request for a meeting; furious Kate EXPLODED when cops first told her she was a suspect; and family spokesman Clarence Mitchell has given a university SPEECH on the topic Missing Maddie McCann — the perfect PR campaign
“A pal of the McCanns said Kate, 39, believes the family were STALKED by Maddie’s kidnapper in the days before she went missing”. WOW
COUPLE hit back on film. Says Clarence Mitchell, the spokesperson: “It is not us being greedy. It is us being needy“
DAILY MAIL: “It’s all my fault, admits Maddie’s father”
Well, not quite. Gerry McCann is making no confession. He maintains that the fault lies with a kidnapper. Says the Mail: “Gerry McCann is tortured by guilt that Madeleine’s disappearance is his fault”
Will he tell all? Mr McCann tells Vanity Fair’s Judy Bachrach: “I can’t talk to you about the details of what happened. I live under threat from the Portuguese - if I do talk - of two years’ imprisonment”
“THIRD POLICE SUSPECT BREAKS HIS SILENCE” – Says Robert Murat to Vanity Fair: “All I can say is that I am innocent”
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE - MOTHER IS SHUNNED BY PRIEST”
Page 9: “KATE’S SCREAMS AS POLICE TOLD HER: YOU’RE A SUSPECT – KATE McCann screamed when told by police that she was a suspect in Madeleine’s disappearance, it emerged yesterday. Opening the door of her rented villa to a Portuguese officer the family had come to know, Kate, 39, shouted: ‘Do you honestly believe that I would murder my own child?’”
Gerry McCann is a “39-year-old cardiologist”. Facts!
On the speculation: “Gerry says bitterly: ‘Yes, yes, I know. Kate killed her in a frenzy, Madeleine was sedated by us, she fell down the stairs – in which case you would have thought they’d have found her body. I’ve heard all of that. There are a huge number of theories in the media. But what I want to know is, who told them all that?’”
DAILY STAR: “Anguished and painfully thin, his wife Kate was too upset to answer even a single question during the interview with glossy US magazine Vanity Fair. Gerry revealed in the 7,500-word magazine article he had to be coaxed by a counsellor into talking publicly about his daughter in the days after she disappeared”
DAILY RECORD: “Maddie’s Dad: Slim Chance Of Getting Her Back”
“Distraught Gerry McCann has admitted the chances of him seeing his missing daughter Madeleine again are ‘slim’”
VANITY FAIR: “Unanswered Prayers”
“After three-year-old Madeleine McCann disappeared on a family vacation in Portugal, her parents pursued a high-stakes strategy: media saturation. It succeeded beyond their wildest imaginings—winning the aid of everyone from J. K. Rowling to the Pope—and failed miserably. Getting the first in-depth interview with Gerry McCann since he and his wife, Kate, were declared suspects, the author re-traces their footsteps to their daughter’s empty bed”
And then a policeman appeared. His name Ricardo. “Because for months they used to have regular weekly meetings with the Portuguese police, and then they stopped,” recalls Gerry’s older sister Trish Cameron
“Do you have something to tell us?” Ricardo asked.
“No,” Kate replied. “Do you have something to tell us?”
“He nodded. “Yes. You are being made arguidos”…

January 10th, 2008 at 8:55 am
1st ?
January 10th, 2008 at 8:56 am
1098th ?
January 10th, 2008 at 9:00 am
Good morning everybody.
January 10th, 2008 at 9:00 am
Edit…..”And the Madeleine ‘Look into my eyes’ campaign? Says Gerry: “We thought it was possible this could hurt her. Her abductor might do something to her eye. But in marketing terms it was a good ploy”.
****************
How callous is that?
January 10th, 2008 at 9:00 am
well anything new today guys
January 10th, 2008 at 9:00 am
morning
January 10th, 2008 at 9:02 am
May, I was just readingthat myself.
Bloke’s unbelievable, what the hell is he talking about marketing terms for?
January 10th, 2008 at 9:03 am
Morning all.
Anyone heard who resigned yesterday from the scam, sorry fund?
January 10th, 2008 at 9:03 am
I wish I could roll back time and go back to the day before Madeleine was abducted. I would slow down time. I would get a really good look around and have a really good think. And I’d think: Where are you? Who are you? Who is secretly watching my family? Because someone was watching my family very, very carefully. And taking notes.’ ”
————————————–
Really?
I would have thought that, provided with a time machine, Kate would have protected her children.
At least, any normal person would have done…
January 10th, 2008 at 9:06 am
if maddie had ever been abducted as her parents claim,they were signing her death warrant with the media circus they put on and were warned of this.the only conclusion that can be taken from that is maddie was dead already,and they knew it
January 10th, 2008 at 9:06 am
‘It was at that point, Trish says, that her sister-in-law became incandescent with rage, screaming, “Do you honestly believe that I would murder my own child?”
Thus helpfully establishing that Kate is prone to incandescent bursts of rage…
http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/02/mccanns200802?currentPage=1
January 10th, 2008 at 9:07 am
Morning all, there seems to be two threads at the moment, 8o posts on the other one. I’ve told them that this one is up and running so hopefully they’ll find us soon.
January 10th, 2008 at 9:08 am
10 chenier
Are we dealing with normal people? What is normal in our celebrity worshipping society?
Maybe by today’s standards in the UK they are normal. In that case I would prefer not to be normal.
January 10th, 2008 at 9:09 am
9 Chenier
I think one of their most serious mistakes has been to constantly seek someone else to blame.
January 10th, 2008 at 9:11 am
Chloe Spain picked up on the previous thread the use of the word ‘murder’ by Kate.
It is, indeed, odd.
Not as odd as Trish dumping her sister-in-law in the deep ddo dah as prone to outbursts of incandescent rage…
January 10th, 2008 at 9:11 am
4 May
“Her abductor might do something to her eye.”
Or to the rest of her. I can’t believe he said this.
January 10th, 2008 at 9:13 am
15 Chenier
Oh yes, I fully agree.
January 10th, 2008 at 9:13 am
13
Will Says:
January 10th, 2008 at 9:08 am
10 chenier
Are we dealing with normal people? What is normal in our celebrity worshipping society?
Maybe by today’s standards in the UK they are normal. In that case I would prefer not to be normal.
——————————————–
But does it not occur to them that this comes over as barking mad?
January 10th, 2008 at 9:15 am
someone pick me up!!!!
((((((((THUMP)))))))))))
January 10th, 2008 at 9:15 am
I’m not one to favour conspiracy theories (they are often an easy excuse for something a lot more complicated). But you should think about the following “coincidences”:
- A Mr Andrew Brown (allegedly Gordon Brown’s brother)works for EDF energy which operates nuclear power stations. In November 2005, EFD’s Chief Executive, Vincent de Rivaz, told a parliamentary committee that new nuclear power stations could be built within ten years if planning and licensing laws are relaxed.
- Gerry McCann is a medical advisor to COMARE, a governemnt committee which monitors radiation in the enviroment.
- Today Gordon Brown is expected to announce formal go-ahead for new Nuclear Power Stations in the UK.
- This morning in a French radio station EDF was mentioned as “a favourite” to be granted the contract to build and run some of these power stations in the UK.
All of these may just be coincidences, they do not in anyway suggest that the Drs McCann are in anyway involved in any wrongdoings.
January 10th, 2008 at 9:15 am
Morning all
Thanks whoever posted the link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jb6M0lwg1Q4
January 10th, 2008 at 9:17 am
13
Will Says:
January 10th, 2008 at 9:08 am
10 chenier
Are we dealing with normal people? What is normal in our celebrity worshipping society?
Maybe by today’s standards in the UK they are normal. In that case I would prefer not to be normal.
——————————————–
Absolutely! ‘Celebrity’ was a term used to describe people who had achieved fame through their ability or achievements. The term now seems to have been hijacked by people who are in desperate need for reckognition and adulation for the sake of it, not an ounce of substance to them. I now feel it’s almost an insult to apply the term to people with real talent and ability.
January 10th, 2008 at 9:17 am
Ah, that’s the point. To us they seem to be total fruit loops, to the ever increasing section of UK society that is typified by Hello, OK!, Big Brother and Jeremy Vile (Kyle) they are being presented as celebrities and as such all else can be forgiven.
January 10th, 2008 at 9:17 am
Kate could hardly answer questions, but had a chat with a film
producer! Being doctors they should have known her eye would be targeted, so why did they give photo of her in the first place. No-one would abduct a child with a mark like that which would be seen a mile away. They didn’t want that child!
January 10th, 2008 at 9:20 am
More from Vanity Fair:
“The McCanns have completely changed the way we now look for missing children—it used to be you go to the police; now it means you go to the media, to celebrities,” says a disapproving Scotland Yard specialist in abused children.
So much for the claim that K&G were told it was fine to go to the media by specialists in the field…
January 10th, 2008 at 9:21 am
19
brandon flours Says:
January 10th, 2008 at 9:15 am
someone pick me up!!!!
((((((((THUMP)))))))))))
—————————————————————–
What’s occurred BF? Ready to assist, something from the bar?
January 10th, 2008 at 9:21 am
http://www.vanityfair.com/cult…..anns200802
January 10th, 2008 at 9:22 am
http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/02/mccanns200802
January 10th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Rockhopper
OW OW OW WOW !!!!
Why thank you !!
Have I been slipped LSD?
Am I reading right?
I AM SHOCKED!!!!!!
HIDEKIFYED!!
HOW CAN THEY SAY ALL THIS !!!!????????????
(Cheers a LARGE jamesons please !!!Thanks)
January 10th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Why are they still saying it wasn’t irresponsible to leave the door unlocked?
How can it be responsible to leave 3 small children in an unlocked apartment?