Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Marcos Correia Knows, A Find And Jeremy Vargas http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html Tabloid news for broadsheet readers Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:27:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Postman Pat http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213833 Postman Pat Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:41:47 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213833 Mods I have just seen your comment to my post, a comment about which I shall be making a formal complaint, I resent your vieled threat and it only confirms why I and others choose to restrict our posts. PeterO, still read don’t post to often, was amazed at the amount of feeling Sledgehammers expulsion has provoked. I agree with you 100% that this was manipulated, and it was manipulated by Sledgehammer. Mods did not come out of it very well and trying to stifle peoples views on it does them no favours either, there was only one loser yesterday and it wasn’t Sledgehammer, who as far as I can see has provided most of the real information on this case. The post that caused the furore, is a verifiable post, so what was the Hammers real motive, he certainly is not as stupid as some posters like to make out, I don’t think we have heard the last of this. Administrator: Utter rubbish. No-one’s views have been stifled. Motivation? Try distraction. For instance, this has the feel of a soothsayer’s prediction. Like to hear one of mine? Administrator: This posting has been deliberately manipulated to suggest I have just made the foregoing comment. That is disgraceful and unacceptable. I sincerely hope the implication was in error. Complain at once, please do. -agw Mods I have just seen your comment to my post, a comment about which I shall be making a formal complaint, I resent your vieled threat and it only confirms why I and others choose to restrict our posts. PeterO, still read don’t post to often, was amazed at the amount of feeling Sledgehammers expulsion has provoked. I agree with you 100% that this was manipulated, and it was manipulated by Sledgehammer. Mods did not come out of it very well and trying to stifle peoples views on it does them no favours either, there was only one loser yesterday and it wasn’t Sledgehammer, who as far as I can see has provided most of the real information on this case. The post that caused the furore, is a verifiable post, so what was the Hammers real motive, he certainly is not as stupid as some posters like to make out, I don’t think we have heard the last of this.

Administrator: Utter rubbish. No-one’s views have been stifled. Motivation? Try distraction. For instance, this has the feel of a soothsayer’s prediction. Like to hear one of mine?

Administrator: This posting has been deliberately manipulated to suggest I have just made the foregoing comment. That is disgraceful and unacceptable. I sincerely hope the implication was in error.
Complain at once, please do. -agw

]]> By: alice http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213484 alice Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:34:16 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213484 i think the man that came around that ladies house at least knows where madeeline maccan same as holy and jessicaathey suspected the teacher and found out he was the one that killed the two incent girls i think the man that came around that ladies house at least knows where madeeline maccan
same as holy and jessicaathey suspected the teacher and found out he was the one that killed the two incent girls

]]> By: matty http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213382 matty Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:51:46 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213382 this is annoying this is annoying

]]> By: matty http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213380 matty Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:49:40 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213380 Will get it right Will get it right

]]> By: matty http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213376 matty Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:42:54 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213376 Try try try again Try try try again

]]> By: matty http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213370 matty Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:33:32 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213370 ]]> By: Postman Pat http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213312 Postman Pat Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:39:51 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213312 PeterO, still read don't post to often, was amazed at the amount of feeling Sledgehammers expulsion has provoked. I agree with you 100% that this was manipulated, and it was manipulated by Sledgehammer. Mods did not come out of it very well and trying to stifle peoples views on it does them no favours either, there was only one loser yesterday and it wasn't Sledgehammer, who as far as I can see has provided most of the real information on this case. The post that caused the furore, is a verifiable post, so what was the Hammers real motive, he certainly is not as stupid as some posters like to make out, I don't think we have heard the last of this. <strong>Administrator:</strong> Utter rubbish. No-one's views have been stifled. Motivation? Try distraction. For instance, this has the feel of a soothsayer's prediction. Like to hear one of mine? PeterO, still read don’t post to often, was amazed at the amount of feeling Sledgehammers expulsion has provoked. I agree with you 100% that this was manipulated, and it was manipulated by Sledgehammer. Mods did not come out of it very well and trying to stifle peoples views on it does them no favours either, there was only one loser yesterday and it wasn’t Sledgehammer, who as far as I can see has provided most of the real information on this case. The post that caused the furore, is a verifiable post, so what was the Hammers real motive, he certainly is not as stupid as some posters like to make out, I don’t think we have heard the last of this.

Administrator: Utter rubbish. No-one’s views have been stifled. Motivation? Try distraction. For instance, this has the feel of a soothsayer’s prediction. Like to hear one of mine?

]]> By: willo http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213309 willo Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:18:49 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213309 Thanks for a nice reply Duncan. Appreciated. Thanks for a nice reply Duncan. Appreciated.

]]> By: willo http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213308 willo Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:17:21 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213308 Another disappearance of a little boy in Spain (in March '07) has been linked to Madeleine now......but wait a minute, the parents of the boy have been corresponding with the McCanns since May. Then nine months later they establish a link and go to the media. They have to be kidding. IMO Everything coming from the McCann camp is just too transparent. There must be another angle otherwise it looks that they are being led to their own funeral by their own advisors. Maybe a sacrifice or two is on the agenda. IMO. Another disappearance of a little boy in Spain (in March ‘07) has been linked to Madeleine now……but wait a minute, the parents of the boy have been corresponding with the McCanns since May. Then nine months later they establish a link and go to the media. They have to be kidding.
IMO Everything coming from the McCann camp is just too transparent. There must be another angle otherwise it looks that they are being led to their own funeral by their own advisors.
Maybe a sacrifice or two is on the agenda. IMO.

]]> By: DuncanR http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213307 DuncanR Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:13:29 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213307 Some comments are put into Mod queue by Admin/Mods for review if we are in doubt about anything in the post. Majority of items in Mod queue, however, are placed there automatically by software that protects the site. If a post contains more than one link, if it is a first time poster, or if a regular mispells their name etc then the software will dump that comment in Mod queue. The software is also triggered by certain 'key words' in the post. Sometimes, however, even Mods/Admin don't know why a particular post has triggered the site defense software. In the case of your theory, the delay in releasing it was simply because it was overshadowed by everything else that was happening yesterday Apologies, Duncanr Some comments are put into Mod queue by Admin/Mods for review if we are in doubt about anything in the post.

Majority of items in Mod queue, however, are placed there automatically by software that protects the site. If a post contains more than one link, if it is a first time poster, or if a regular mispells their name etc then the software will dump that comment in Mod queue. The software is also triggered by certain ‘key words’ in the post. Sometimes, however, even Mods/Admin don’t know why a particular post has triggered the site defense software. In the case of your theory, the delay in releasing it was simply because it was overshadowed by everything else that was happening yesterday

Apologies, Duncanr

]]> By: willo http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213302 willo Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:54:42 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213302 Hi Duncan thanks. Appreciate that. The moment has sort of gone now lol. Different mind set today. More interested in why it was considered for moderation. Not being funny, but just interested. Might help define a boundry for my next theory. Might seek out a herbal inspiration for that one too. Appreciate the time and humour you guys put into the forum. regards from sweltering NZ. Hi Duncan thanks.
Appreciate that.
The moment has sort of gone now lol. Different mind set today.
More interested in why it was considered for moderation. Not being funny, but just interested. Might help define a boundry for my next theory.
Might seek out a herbal inspiration for that one too.
Appreciate the time and humour you guys put into the forum.
regards from sweltering NZ.

]]> By: DuncanR http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213297 DuncanR Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:38:12 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213297 Will Have released your theory from Mod queue However, you may want to repost it here so people don't miss it? Will

Have released your theory from Mod queue

However, you may want to repost it here so people don’t miss it?

]]> By: DuncanR http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213294 DuncanR Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:23:07 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213294 935 - Will +++++++++++++++++++++ Just about to take 3 dogs for a walk before they piss all over the floor. Can you hang on a bit. I'll check the mod queue when I come back (btw ingenious theory!) 935 - Will

+++++++++++++++++++++

Just about to take 3 dogs for a walk before they piss all over the floor.

Can you hang on a bit. I’ll check the mod queue when I come back

(btw ingenious theory!)

]]> By: Wanderer http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213289 Wanderer Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:07:25 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213289 935 Maybe Scrappy Doo will sort it out for you? Offer a Scooby snack? 935

Maybe Scrappy Doo will sort it out for you? Offer a Scooby snack?

]]> By: willo http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213286 willo Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:53:41 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213286 650 willo Says: February 4th, 2008 at 8:24 pm Mods And Admin, I had a post moderated yesterday (490, I think) and it’s still under moderation. Could you tell me why? Cough, excuse me. Anybody there to answer my question yet? Or are you waiting for rogatory letters to arrive? Can I repost my theory? 650
willo Says:

February 4th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
Mods And Admin,
I had a post moderated yesterday (490, I think) and it’s still under moderation. Could you tell me why?

Cough, excuse me. Anybody there to answer my question yet?

Or are you waiting for rogatory letters to arrive?

Can I repost my theory?

]]> By: DuncanR http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213284 DuncanR Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:51:01 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213284 <img src="http://bestsmileys.com/dogs/3.gif" alt="" /> The above was lifted from BestSmileys web site. For explanation how it was done see below <a href="http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aV2DzAGS" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://www.postimage.org/aV2DzAGS.jpg" border="0" /></a>

The above was lifted from BestSmileys web site. For explanation how it was done see below

]]> By: DuncanR http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213280 DuncanR Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:32:00 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213280 Nite, V.Q. Nite, V.Q.

]]> By: veritablequandary http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213279 veritablequandary Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:21:53 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213279 Night Duncan, I am out for the count too. My little feral kitty has survived the worst of the cold! (My signficant other thinks s/he is a neighbourhood cat that prefers our catfood but I think this theory is rubbish) Night Duncan,

I am out for the count too.
My little feral kitty has survived the worst of the cold!
(My signficant other thinks s/he is a neighbourhood cat that prefers our catfood but I think this theory is rubbish)

]]> By: veritablequandary http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213278 veritablequandary Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:18:56 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213278 929 DuncanR Says: 921 - markskidd +++++++++++++++++++++++++ Ssshhh! Not so loud! ~~~~~ He's a kid, doesn't know better. He's asleep now anyway, the wee one. 929 DuncanR Says:

921 - markskidd

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Ssshhh!

Not so loud!

~~~~~
He’s a kid, doesn’t know better. He’s asleep now anyway, the wee one.

]]> By: DuncanR http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213277 DuncanR Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:07:05 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/180227.html#comment-213277 921 - markskidd +++++++++++++++++++++++++ Ssshhh! Not so loud! 921 - markskidd

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Ssshhh!

Not so loud!

]]>