http://www.youtube.com/user/JANETMARIEJAMES

She has a shrine to Madeleine McCann! I find it so disturbing. Her Madeleine wallpaper and her friends with their Madeleine avatars. It’s absolutley bizarre.
aw0422

The McCanns, IMO, are not in control, and could not “come forward” with the truth, without facing terrible consequences.

As you say, they went along with a plan to make money from their dead child, and are willing to lie to the whole world in order to make this money. IMO, they were making money off of Madeleine, even when she was alive. It is too unspeakable. No wonder the priest in PDL called them “lost souls”. They have no conscience and are beyond hope.

Yet , still, to be clear-headed about this, the McCanns are being manipulated by Clarence Mitchell, whose salary is paid for by Brian Kennedy, who received pounds 60million financing from the Royal Bank of Scotland (RSB) on May 21, 2007. And the RSB was the bank that offered customers the opportunity to make over-the-counter cash payments to the FindMadeleineFund. How many other times in history has this bank, or any bank, done such a thing for a family with a missing child? And BTW those cash payments were never publically accounted for — no one knows where they went.

February 5th, 2008 at 10:42 pm
Good post by Bugalugs1970 3A

Alledgedly a “criminal profiler ”

http://www.the3arguidos.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3105
**********************
Yes, that was a good post. Bugalugs said he did not want to reveal who the criminal profiler was who wrote that. Whoever it is, I agree with the assessment that the McCanns appear “guilty” of knowing that Madeleine is dead. That would make them guilty of lying, fraud, etc. But it would not mean that either of them accidentally killed the girl — it could have been someone else who did this, and the McCanns are merely pretending not to know who this person is.

Surely the body disposal was done with at least several assistants, also with the McCanns’ knowledge even if they did not participate.

Now, if the McCanns did not kill the girl, and they know who did, and they know this person is a “predator”, then their child neglect, already extreme, takes on an unimaginably horrific dimension. This would give them yet another motive to persist in the cover-up, even though they had not killed the girl, on top of the primary alleged motive that the killer is someone with enormous influence and power in their lives, and in the lives of many others, including the T7, Brian Kennedy, etc.

Generally, someone with such enormous influence would be a source of virtually limitless financial power, someone who could “make or break” you financially. The McCanns would have been motivated in the first place by currying favor with this person. Why should anything change just because the girl is dead?

Brian Kennedy was granted financing of pounds 60 million , from the Royal Bank of Scotland, as announced on May 21, 2007. Is it a coincidence that Brian Kennedy felt “compelled” to help out with the “Madeleine McCann crisis”?

Below is the assessment to which I refer. I don’t think anything in this assessment contradicts my own speculation above. However, read it again, remembering that all of those interviews and all of the behavior that makes the McCanns look guilty was done with the coaching and advice of Clarence Mitchell, who works for Brian Kennedy. I’m not saying that Clarence has the power to make the McCanns appear guilty, but he certainly did nothing to stop them from doing it. To the contrary, he has been encouraging them, as if attempting to do exactly what the Criminal Profiler below suggests — focus the investigation on the McCanns. It could be that such a focus, in the end , will itself be a distraction.

——————————
bugalugs1970 wrote:
This is a criminal profiler view on the mccanns

They left three very young children unattended while they pursued pleasure for themselves. This is a sign of narcissism and a lack of attachment to one’s children.

Both Kate and Gerry speak about Madeleine in a very impersonal and flat manner. Gerry writes nothing personal about Maddie on his blog. Maddie seems more like an abstraction than a real child. This is a sign of lack of normal attachment.

Kate states that the last words of Maddie before she went missing were “Today has been the best day of my life.” Maddie’s last words are unusual for a three-year-old girl. Kids that young don’t usually have a concept of their “life.” “I am having the best time,” and “I am having fun” are more normal statements for that age. Next, Kate says Maddie was “very pleased with her life,” also an odd comment for an adult to say of her child. Both statements lead me to believe Kate knows Maddie is dead because of her emphasis on the inclusion of the word “life,” as though there were a set of parentheses around the first day of her life and the last. Kate may want to convince herself that she gave Maddie a good life, right up until her last day, the best day of her life. Also, it is quite common for people involved in the death of a relative to exaggerate the perfection of their relationship or the last moments to insinuate that nothing negative was going on between the parties and, therefore, nothing untoward could have occurred.

The McCanns have never personally offered the reward on television or posted the reward at the web site. Almost all parents of missing children do this.

If Kate really believes Maddie is alive and being cared for in someone’s home, she would make continual direct pleas to the captor for Maddie’s return (“Please just drop her off any public location…”). Almost all parents of missing children who believe they are alive will do this.

Neither Kate of Gerry have taken or indicate they will take a polygraph. Parents of missing children do this to clear themselves so the police will not waste time focusing on them.

Kate and Gerry appearances show little fluctuation in emotion (except when they feel they are being accused of drugging Maddie). Neither breaks down and cries or blurts out anything with emotion (“Maddie! We love you, honey! Don’t give up! We will find you!” Or “Please give us our Maddie back! Oh my God, please!”) Usually in a set of parents, we will see emotions bounce around, one of them falling apart, one becoming angry; with the McCanns their answers are carefully constructed and evenly relayed. Their appearances feel more like performances than parents desperately trying to reach out to their child, the kidnapper or the public. Yes, they are British, but even a stiff-upper lip tends not to look like this under these circumstances.

There are muted flashes of anger, frustration, and annoyance directed from one of the McCanns to the other during their interviews which is very unusual for parents of a missing child. There is a strong feeling of control rather than support between the couple.

Gerry McCann commented in one interview: “In about the middle of June things, about five or six weeks, things were going really very, very quiet and I was actually quite glad of that and I thought we would start to get back to a more normal existence and a quieter form of campaigning, using the Internet and raising and broadening the political issues which have been highlighted to us and I saw that as a long term focus.”

For a parent to have any interest in political issues so soon after his child has gone missing when the one and only concern should be finding their loved one, is extremely bizarre. That Gerry should see his long term focus at this point in time as a political one is also very concerning. This statement would be less concerning if a few years had passed and the McCanns, accepting they were likely never to find their daughter, wanted to do something to help others not suffer as they had and to do something in their daughter’s name. But, to think this way so early on indicates Gerry believes or knows his daughter is dead and indicates more self-interest than interest in his daughter’s welfare.

Gerry’s blog focuses very little on Madeleine and more on his and Kate’s activities. The cheery quality of the blog and self-centeredness of the content is a sign of disconnect between Gerry and Madeleine and a sign of having moved on as if Gerry knows Maddie is already dead.

Kate states she had trouble sleeping during the first five days after Maddie went missing but has been sleeping fine since. Very few parents of abducted children can sleep very well knowing their child might be in pain, crying, and scared. Kate’s ability to sleep infers she is not worrying about Maddie because Maddie is dead already (or has an inability to feel empathy for others).

The quick return to normal activities is unusual for parents of abducted children; most obsess continually and can’t think of anything else and have trouble going through the simplest routines of life.

Kate and Gerry left their twins in Portugal while they went to see the Pope. Most parents of abducted children would be paranoid to be away from their other children for fear something would happen to them. Furthermore, to leave your children in the exact location where your other child was taken, whether one had a relative with them or not, is odd for parents who believe the abductor of their missing child is in the very same vicinity.

The McCanns left Portugal as soon as they became Aguidos. If the only reason they were made suspects was a legal one so the police could ask them important questions to help them clear themselves, they should have stayed to continue to help the police put the matter straight and get the focus off of them.

Much of the PR campaign at this point appears to be responding to public opinion and trying to answer their suspicions about the innocence of the McCanns, not finding Madeleine. Even in the latest move, the television appearance of the McCanns did not make a plea to the abductor or send a message to Maddie. It appeared to be a show to prove Kate has emotions. Following the show, an artist’s rendition of a supposed suspect was released many months after he was said to have been seen by one of their friends. The release of the picture will be counterproductive to actually finding Maddie, as not only is it based on a very questionable witness sighting, but may have nothing to do with Maddie. Such a picture will only elicit droves of worthless tips and waste police time. This is an unwise choice of strategy unless the purpose is to distract the police from focusing on the McCanns.

It is possible that the McCanns suffer from certain psychiatric designations that causes them behave in a manner which makes then look guilty of involvement in the disappearance of Maddie when in actuality, they had no part in it. For this reason, I can only say, they are good suspects; I cannot label them guilty.

SUMMARY

So, to recap, Madeleine McCann is 99% likely to be dead. My top suspects at this point, based on behavior and what information can be validated, are the McCanns. If I were working with the police on the case, I would be focusing heavily on them as my investigative focus. However, I would not rule out the possibility of a child predator and, therefore, I would spend a portion of time pursuing leads and information that might prove this possibility to be true, and I would make sure I did not force fit any evidence to match my theories nor ignore any evidence that might point me away from those theories. As new evidence surfaced, I would take this into account, reanalyze the information, and adjust my conclusions accordingly.

“PJ worried by the lack of cooperation fom the home office…..”
oh dear…..not very new news!

Still going on about SHammer????? I just cant believe it.
Are you people going to drop the subject?
Anorak is not about SHammer,especially this thread but about a little girl who sadly has died

And no new spin?Very disappointing…..
I told you: clarrie has tonsilitis and the mcFools lost their tongues
What a funny old world!
PJ working diligently and shutting everybody up?
Frogmen back on earth after cleaning the reservoir from old ropes and dead fish…..good boys

A big slice of sun for everybody for breakfast

Administrator: Meritocracy…a social system that gives opportunities and advantages to people on the basis of their ability rather than, e.g. their wealth or seniority. One can only assume a potentially disruptive element such as Plato was sent down from St. Trolls early in the first semester since he/she is unable to read a range of reference works with any degree of accuracy.
Plato is correct in the assumption there is a titular head of all governing systems.
I have lived under dictatorship. Has Plato?
Here all are free to vote with their feet. Feel strong, feel free.-agw

February 6th, 2008 at 3:55 am
959
Kiwi Says:
February 6th, 2008 at 3:19 am

WHY THEN isn’t the Maddie fund going to pay for this search for the entire lake?
Does anyone know?
Thanks
******************

My mistake !! of course…that makes sense, not going to pay to look for dead child, only live one …I must pay attention !!!

February 6th, 2008 at 4:17 am
960 Cheryl

Gladys was a joke.

________________
REPLY: Really? Well, he/she did sign his/her name as GladysX! Hey, a man actually had a sense of nice humour on here!

February 5th, 2008 at 7:32 pm
488 Irene re Kenny ken

Thanks for this, it is very interesting.

But it makes me think that another grave danger to the twins is Kate’s very obvious depression. As long as there are “minders” around to assure the twins’ safety, they will likely be okay. but a depressed parent, taking meds, unable to even hold a part-time job of two working days a week, well…..that does not bode well for the children’s safety, either.
———————————-
REPLY TO THE ABOVE: From what can gather or rather presume Kate McCanns’ depression is brought on by the disappearance of her daughter as well as being named one of the suspects in her daughter’s diappearance more likely than not being aware of public condemnation all around her. You would not suffer some form of depressions under same circumstances, Remiuis? She herself announce she was not going to return to work. One could infer from that is she was staying home to devote herself to the other two little ones. You would not want to remain with your children as much as possible under such tragic circumstances? Millions of people throughout the world take some sort of meds for depression, anxieties in this day and age. Doctors prescribe them like giving out candy - that is a known fact! Pop a pill you’ll feel better!
—————————————————————
It brings to mind the case of Andrea Yates, who was clinically depressed, and eventually developed psychosis and drowned all five of her children in the home’s bathtub, after first locking up the family dog and waiting for her husband to head off to work “because he would have stopped” her.
—————————————
REPLY TO ABOVE: Andrea Yates had five children and after the first one development post-partum psychosis, which the UK recognizes as a psychiatric mental condition and women are seldom charged who take the life of their child with such a mental condition. However, after each child was born her condition worsened even further - she attempted suicide several times; was institutionalized several times; suffered severedmental depressions, was classified as psychotic, suicidal, began having hallucinations, was self-mutilating, and all most totally non-functional. Her husband was warned not to have any more children but he did get her pregnant time and time again. By the time the fourth child was born people around her noticed her insanity. Here is the time-line when the husband decided she should have the fifth child, fully aware of her severe mental conditions. The following is from “Profile of Andrea Yates, from Charles Mantaldo”: “In March of 2000, Andrea, on Rusty’s urging, became pregnant and stopped taking the Haldol. On November 30, 2000, Mary was born. Andrea was coping but on March 12, her father died and immediately her mental state digressed. She stopped talking, refused liquids, mutilated herself, and would not feed Mary. She also frantically read the Bible. By the end of March Andrea returned to a different hospital. Her psychiatrist, Dr. Mohammed Saeed, treated her briefly with Haldol but discontinued it, saying that she did not did not seem psychotic. Andrea was released only to return again in May. She was released in 10 days and in her last follow-up visit with Saeed, she was told to think positive thoughts and to see a psychologist.

“Two days later, Rusty left for work and before his mother arrived to help, Andrea began to put into action the thoughts that had consumed her for two years. That is when she took the lives of her five children!”
———————————–

Is Kate so depressed? If so, did her depression contribute in any way to madeleine’s “disappearance?” It’s a question that should be asked and answered for the safety of her surviving children.
_____________________
REPLYTO ABOVE: There is absolutely no comparison with whatever depression Kate McCann is having now if she is having depression, with Andres Yates.
——————————-
These are more than hypothetical issues. Children really die at the hands of such parents every day. Yates was not a medical doctor, but she was smart enough to be class valedictorian of her high school, so intelligence has little to do with what happens to these children.
____________________________
REPLY: Children die at the hands of people from all walks of life. A lawyer blew his 12 year old son’s brains out and then took his own life down here the other year as his wife was leaving him and taking their son with her. Boy friends beat their girl friends’ babies to death because the wee child’s crying bothers them. A father walked into his estranged wife’s house about 5 miles from here and killed his two children while she took a shower because she was taking them back to her country. A young woman is now standing trial and facing the death penalty if convicted as she put her baby in the microwave oven and killed it because her boy friend (the father) cheated on her. The other year a man from the UK married to and living with an American over here killed his wife and young daughter and fled back to the UK to his parents before the bodies were found. Only way we got him back here to stand trial for their cold blooded murders was we had to promise we would not execute his sorry arse!

As much as I try to stretch my imagination - I can find no logical reason to suspect the Mccanns took the life of their child. Neglect opened the door for the child to disappear but….

Gladys was a joke.

WHY THEN isn’t the Maddie fund going to pay for this search for the entire lake?
Does anyone know?
Thanks

***********************

I already asked that question and no-one had any real answers, apart from silly ones, perhaps Clarrie could answer us ? Seems logical to me since the Fund is supposed to pay for information or actions leading to the discovery of Madeleine….not paying Mortgages and stuff like that. Perhaps Branson et al will jump in and help fund it since it seems the most logical of the latest lines of enquiry ?
***************************************
the Fund is supposed to pay for information or actions leading to the discovery of Madeleine
——————————————————
Where did you get that idea from?????? the fund is to **raise money** to buy legal services for certain people to hide behind!!
To that end it is obvious that an image of a blonde girl will raise money whereas a search for a dead corpse will not.
Sorry to be so blunt! but pretending to spend cash looking for a corpse will not attract more funding.
+++++++
it seems the most logical of the latest lines of enquiry ?
————————————————————-
The latest line of enquiry is where it has always been from day one, the many discrepancies in the story the parents and their friends told! It is important to draw a line between the official police enquiry and the illusional private enquiry!

All of the above purely IMO.

February 6th, 2008 at 2:31 am
Hello
It doesn’t mention in this article however I have read there is a dive team hired by the lawyer to search for Maddie in a lake.
The lawyer said he is paying for this but can’t pay for the entire lake search and the McCanns are in agreement with the search by the divers.
WHY THEN isn’t the Maddie fund going to pay for this search for the entire lake?
Does anyone know?
Thanks

***********************

I already asked that question and no-one had any real answers, apart from silly ones, perhaps Clarrie could answer us ? Seems logical to me since the Fund is supposed to pay for information or actions leading to the discovery of Madeleine….not paying Mortgages and stuff like that. Perhaps Branson et al will jump in and help fund it since it seems the most logical of the latest lines of enquiry ?

Hello
It doesn’t mention in this article however I have read there is a dive team hired by the lawyer to search for Maddie in a lake.
The lawyer said he is paying for this but can’t pay for the entire lake search and the McCanns are in agreement with the search by the divers.
WHY THEN isn’t the Maddie fund going to pay for this search for the entire lake?
Does anyone know?
Thanks
*************************
Maybe they don’t want to pay out money for old rope ??????????