
Madeleine McCann: Alipio Ribeiro’s Error, Another Madeleine And Days Of Anxiety
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN: “Chief says sorry to Maddie cops”
“Police national director Alipio Ribeiro angered detectives probing the mystery and a judge even told him to shut up. Mr Ribeiro has now admitted he made an ‘error of expression’”
Mr Ribeiro’s opinion that the Portuguese police may have acted hastily in naming the McCanns as suspects was big news
“Cops in the Algarve are still trying to pin four-year-old Maddie’s disappearance last May on doctors Kate and Gerry, both 39, of Rothley, Leics”
“Pin”?
“Lawyers for the pair want Portugal’s attorney general to clear them as official suspects, but that rarely happens before the end of an investigation”
DAILY MIRROR: “Top cop ‘sorry’ for McCann comment”
Alipio Riberio says it was a “slip of the tongue”. The Mirror says there are “calls for him to resign”, although from whom is not said
Says Carolos Pinto de Abreu, the McCanns’ lawyer: “The status of arguido runs until the end of the inquiry. However, during the inquiry there may be a change”
Clear?
GLASGOW DAILY RECORD: “Cop Rues McCann Suspects Radio ‘Slip’”
Mr Ribeiro “apologised for his remarks to the head of the Portuguese Police Federation ASFIC and officers leading the probe into Madeleine’s disappearance.” A source tells us: “Ribeiro said he didn’t mean to say it but faced with pressure from the media, the words came out of his mouth.”
Why then did he go on the radio and talk of the case?
“He insisted he still has total confidence in the teams who investigated and are investigating the case.”
NORTH WALES NEWSPAPERS: “I fear for the safety of my son”
“I FEAR for the safety of my son after social services told me they don’t have the facilities to help me,” a devoted mother with a rare neurological disease said this week.
Seriously ill mother Sally Burr, from Llandinam, near Llanidloes, recently woke up in the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital to discover her eight-year-old son had not only been forced to watch paramedics operate on her during a 45-minute ambulance journey, but he was missing.
“The first thing that ran through my mind was ‘Oh my God has someone taken him?’ I don’t want another Madeleine McCann incident to happen – he is only eight-years-old, said the distraught mother”
Not another Madeleine McCann. Or another
MALAYSIA STAR: “Days of Anxiety”
“Directed by Otto Bathurst and Simon Curtis, this joint venture between the BBC and HBO is as palpable as any ripped-from-the-tabloids docudrama – heightened by its cinema verite look. And there are notable similarities with the widely publicised search for four-year-old Madeleine McCann: suburban British family, missing toddler, suspected parent, media glare”
Madeleine McCann – the raw case of a missing child - is similar to a work of fiction?
THE EXPRESS, THE MAIL, THE STAR, THE TIMES, THE INDEPENDENT, THE GUARDIAN, THE TELEGRAPH – No Maddie news – No update on what Mr Ribeiro said
The Disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Posted: 6th, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (898) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





February 22nd, 2008 at 4:14 am
Cheryl in trouble.
I miss loads.
I thought I was on this site all the time - but apparently not.
February 7th, 2008 at 11:12 am
Administrator:
Administrator: Of course life goes on: there are two other children. I was not referring to the loss but the intense media, judicial and peer pressure which puts this family into a living hell.
________________________
Then why ,they don’t return to Portugal ,and tell the Portuguese Police , what they have refusing to tell ?
Such poor parents , that their skin is more important then their own little daughter !
___________________
Administrator:
…puts this family into a living hell.
Reply ,and the Hell of a little child called Madeleine ????
Why ,don’t you worry about that ????????
———-
Mods and Admin
CSN you are misquoting somewhat, he did say family, there are two other children very badly affected by this. But let him answer
February 7th, 2008 at 11:11 am
908
DuncanR,
Thanks for the editing. Don’t you ‘love’ the little guy?
Tried it with the ” earlier, but that didn’t work either. May be caught in the spam filter?
Love you and now off to the forest, walk the puppy and then off to work. Bye.
February 7th, 2008 at 10:57 am
906
Logic
How come ,such “inocent” parents , can laugh ,all the way 10 days after their daughter “disapear ” ?
The truth ,is , that only in the Portuguese press ,you are able to see , the joy of a couple ,10 days after their daughter disapear !
You can hide ,your feelings ,but your behave ,and the joy in their eyes , speaks for itself !!
_ _ _
Administrator: Of course life goes on: there are two other children. I was not referring to the loss but the intense media, judicial and peer pressure which puts this family into a living hell.
Reply : Why don’t you take ,some time ,and analise , the photos ,and the Portuguese interviews from the Mccanns ?
More ,if you are a normal person ,you can’t know what their feelings are !!
The all behaviour of this couple ,is sick !!
They allawys had one speach for the Brits. media ,and other for the Portuguese media.
Why so many lies , like the shutters ,doors locked / unlocked ….. just to make possible a strange abduction ?
What ABOUT THE SUFFERING OF 3 LITTLE CHILDREN ,LEFT ALONE SEVERAL NIGHTS , AND DON’T TELL ME YOU DON’T KNOW THAT BECAUSE , IT’S A FACT !
Do you have children ?
Do you leave them alone ,with their possible nightmares,collics ,and other things ,that every parent knows ,that happen to such a little children ,during their sleep ?
As for the media ,the mccanns have shown how they love it !!
AGAIN ,I WOULD LIKE YOU, TO HAVE A FULL INVESTIGATION ,FROM THE PHOTOS,INTERVIEWS MADE BY THE MCCANNS !
February 7th, 2008 at 9:56 am
Totje
Nearly there.
I’ve edited your post
the > at the beginning of the line should be <
February 7th, 2008 at 9:09 am
Ah, let’s see if it works: Impedimenta…Rictusempra!
[J.K. Rowling]
>img scr=”http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff265/totje2004/836430969_s-1.gif” alt=””” />
February 7th, 2008 at 7:31 am
agw 905
AGW - I do not want to be nit-picking and agree that the McCanns have behaved in a most extraordinary way and exhibited an almost metallic front. Suffice to say, I do not believe, from the available evidence, that there was an abduction. However, you said in your last post that neither you nor anyone you know could have survived what the McCanns have gone through. I do understand your sentiments but, in that position, what would you have done then? You would either sink or swim. Most people swim although the damage would be irreparable. Consider some of the cot death mothers who were jailed, wrongly. Poor Sally Clark did survive for quite a time before succumbing. Others have tried to rebuild their lives with varying degrees of success. People survive because they have to.
As I have said, I do understand exactly what you mean. The loss of a child and then to be blamed wrongly seems unbearable. To go out playing tennis and running seems unbelievable. But you would almost certainly continue with life.
Administrator: Of course life goes on: there are two other children. I was not referring to the loss but the intense media, judicial and peer pressure which puts this family into a living hell.
February 7th, 2008 at 5:21 am
Cheryl has just posted:
This has become a dictatorship on here with what we can or cannot say,especially the pros and non-prejudgers, even when it isn’t libel nor would cause harm to Anorak.
Well, we’ll make that 99% who have left and stay gone. The main goal on here which has been permitted to carry on is smear the McCanns whether they are guilty of more than neglect or not, use words such as kill and murder without chastisement to those who use them. If that is what being brilliant, complex and thinking is all about then AGW is correct I don’t belong on here. ..
I’ll retreat to being around my civilized friends who have class and know there are two sides to every story and don’t prejudge nor lower oneself to engage in malicious gossip that can cause another irreparable harm.
Cheryl: You are very aware I have never expressed an opinion re the McCann debacle. In the light of the forgoing I may have to touch on that local and personal tragedy (for that is what it is)
As valedictory’s go, your’s (part of which is repeated above) was at best a poor and misguided one. I sincerely hope the appearance of your former Nemesis elsewhere has nothing to do with your decision.
Certainly there will be accusations of cowardice, which I, for one, believe are not true. A retreat to gather strength and resources perhaps. You have after all flounced off into drawing rooms more than once.
Dictatorship? Well the less said the better as your nation yet again prepares to invest the balance of world power into the hands of whoever can best manipulate the system to a point where they are shoe-horned into an unimpeachable position (except on the odd notable occasion). Whoever is anointed will make a point of terrorising the world right out of its undergarments. That is the nature of Empire builders and world-policemen; it is as inevitable as day follows a long night.
You are of course in error yet again. The site is about debate not the battle lines you repeatedly appear to draw in the sand. I care not a jot about your histrionics or flashes of insight into what I have repeatedly warned you (from the very beginning) was a case with great wrongness about it and one which would run and run. All of which is reinforced daily as this sad and dreadful pantomime becomes less about a missing child and more about punishment or absolution for the world’s most besieged parents.
I do know with a clarity you perhaps could never comprehend, that I could not have survived such an onslaught. I am a truly hardened, tried and tested, man who has done and seen much…what does that say of the McCanns? Do they have such a solid faith in each other? Or is there a reason to be strong which no one can truly comprehend? I do see cracks in the armour but, again I have to repeat, neither I nor anyone I have EVER met could survive what that couple has had to endure.
You have constantly taken the viewpoint innocent until proved guilty. Which rather proves the point about free-thinking. Others have said “What if?” Neither side can be silenced in this sort of debate and contrary to your patently ridiculous accusations, both sides are given a fair crack of the whip here.
..and just for the record: I have no opinion on the guilt or innocence of individuals involved in the McCann tragedy. I do not know the answers.
I do know a retreat as massive as this of yours appears to be, is a shallow and vacuous act. That is the viewpoint of one who could never be described as brilliant or complex…I am a simple observer, a scribe.
You say you will “retreat to being around my civilized friends who have class and know there are two sides to every story and don’t prejudge.”
Well!! That leaves me speechless!
Apart from one thing. I predicted that exact statement as coming from you a full eight months ago.
Odd for a non-free-thinker with a blinkered, prejudiced, and that dreadful European jaundiced outlook. Don’t you know?
Finally, this site is NOT about, for or dedicated to, the McCann story. It is much, much, bigger. You should be too.
February 7th, 2008 at 4:41 am
903
Cheryl
Just pop up ,now, and read your post.
The simple fact ,that i can read it ,tells a lot !!!
You wrote :
” I’ll retreat to being around my civilized friends who have class and know there are two sides to every story and don’t prejudge nor lower oneself to engage in malicious gossip that can cause another irreparable harm.”
The gossip has done more harm to 1 country then the other.
Both countries ,are showing their true colors with this case !!
You talk about class !
And what do you do now, with your post ?
Sorry ,no class at all !!
I for one, stoped reading your posts a long time ago
But, it was impossible for me not read your last post.
And class ,don’t seemed to be with you
February 7th, 2008 at 4:23 am
Mods and Admin
And also made some serious slurs on Aardvark’s character a propos of nothing at all! He took the insults on the chin and is a worthwhile poster here. Your views and feelings have hardly been touched in the manner his have,and yet you have put yourself as priority. You have been made very aware that when you or anyone else takes it upon themselves to presume to preach to another poster, you are walking a very fine line, even we do NOT talk down at people that way.
You know very well you are not a Moderator on this site, and you DO NOT have the rights or the responsibilities that we do. And I might stress the latter
_______________
REPLY: I beg your pardon how dare you accuse me of making slurs on Aardvark’s character! I repeated to him what I read when he told you you were not aware of who he was. My interpretation of that when he said it was he is someone important and you should have been aware of it. PERIOD!
Further, I was NOT preaching to him at all I was telling him I didn’t appreciate him saying ‘better for all’ as he presumed then to think it was better for ALL when I or maybe some others didn’t think the same way. I was NOT talking down to him at all. But you are doing a deliberate job on me on purpose to try to infer I was to get me off here.
If you want to know what preaching is look at what and how you have just preached to me very deliberately, condescendingly with an air of absolute superiority (in other words ‘better than thou art’). You may be the MODS and ADMIN but you are NOT superior to me or anyone else! You are a human being as we all are - no better nor worse. Only difference is we, the posters, are the ones who make mistakes! Yes, you run this site and it is supposed to be a Satire Site and a Forum open to all with free speech as long as it does not involve libel. In fact, and many have observed it and said it right up front when leaving - you pick and chose who you chastise on here. The pro and non-prejudgers are deliberately chastised more than the antis. The antis are permitted to make snide remarks, nasty remarks and tell pros and non-prejudgers they do not belong on here, which has caused around 98% of the pros and non-prejudgers to leave this site with the exact same observations — they are not welcomed on here. You say this is a debate site - debate what? There is nothing to debate on here - the antis have it all sown up - their way or no way. Ian, as an example, one asks him a question, as I did one night, gives this response “do you think the McCanns are guilty of neglect.” That is the theme song on here of the antis - if you are pro or non-prejudgers then you do not think they are guilty of neglect. Only an idiot would think they are not guilty of neglect! AGW’s words were very telling today when he talked of dictatorship. This has become a dictatorship on here with what we can or cannot say,especially the pros and non-prejudgers, even when it isn’t libel nor would cause harm to Anorak.
Well, we’ll make that 99% who have left and stay gone. The main goal on here which has been permitted to carry on is smear the McCanns whether they are guilty of more than neglect or not, use words such as kill and murder without chastisement to those who use them. If that is what being brilliant, complex and thinking is all about then AGW is correct I don’t belong on here. I’ll retreat to being around my civilized friends who have class and know there are two sides to every story and don’t prejudge nor lower oneself to engage in malicious gossip that can cause another irreparable harm.
—————-
Mods and Admin
You have read the complete and entire posting from Sledgehammer then? rather obviously not.
There are 2 sides to this story: Aardvarks and Sledgehammers,read them BOTH, then make your pronouncement.
February 7th, 2008 at 2:51 am
770
Batman Says:
February 6th, 2008 at 10:52 pm
Cheryl
Wind up a tiny bit. I gave Bounty a mini-lesson.
________________-
REPLY: I saw that and tried it but it didn’t work only the symbols I typed showed up
February 7th, 2008 at 1:26 am
firestar
its just a repeat from the last 2 days but still I do not like it at all
February 7th, 2008 at 1:24 am
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/28813/Maddie-case-closed/
February 7th, 2008 at 1:00 am
Dropping money….not M3 tho”
Wondering what will be the new spin….
February 7th, 2008 at 12:59 am
have to go sleep
housework at 4.30
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
February 7th, 2008 at 12:56 am
I meant the directors to the fund
February 7th, 2008 at 12:55 am
jo
dropping the need for money
Can these people not read!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
February 7th, 2008 at 12:54 am
Brandon
They are not what? droping the case? or not being arguidos anymore?
February 7th, 2008 at 12:52 am
I hate going to bed angry!!!
February 7th, 2008 at 12:51 am
“We will never give up the search for her.”
Yesterday directors of a fund set up to help the search for Madeleine met in Leicester.
The fund, which once stood at more than £1.2million, is said to have plunged to around £500,000, and directors were discussing ways of boosting it.
Much of the cash is being used to pay a Spanish detective agency, which is charging £50,000 a month.
___________________________
jo
it appears they are not
February 7th, 2008 at 12:46 am
Are we all prepared to drop the case?
February 7th, 2008 at 12:44 am
All lights off????
February 7th, 2008 at 12:36 am
882
mrs pigeon aka brandon
Snow Angel, yes, have made plenty of them, but it’s 7:30pm now and I’m tired. Maybe tomorrow————my neighbors will think I’ve gone daffy. G’night, really this time.
February 7th, 2008 at 12:35 am
806 Batman Says:
This happened to one of my colleagues at a staff meeting; he was trying to sneak away from a boring meeting . . . .
February 7th, 2008 at 12:34 am
shall I turn out the light?
clink clink ( collecting glasses)
night everyone
x
February 7th, 2008 at 12:31 am
I saw Frasier crane/ kelsey grammer biography tonight made me cry
Sally make a snow angel for anorak
February 7th, 2008 at 12:29 am
Going to watch T.V. and have another glass of wine——-Burgundy. Bought it to make a nice French Stew, ala, Julia Childs, but what the heck, we’re having a mighty fine snow storm in Michigan, USA and I’m drinking it right now. God Bless all. (Look up Jimmy Hoffa, a good read about a Union leader) who could be compared to Alipio Ribeiro, who is a Union Leader also. All fact, not my humble opinion.
February 7th, 2008 at 12:26 am
I only have 3 one dips left
February 7th, 2008 at 12:25 am
really? basards
February 7th, 2008 at 12:25 am
i need a biscuit now.
February 7th, 2008 at 12:25 am
who was it again?