<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Breaking Local News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SC46</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-296948</link>
		<dc:creator>SC46</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-296948</guid>
		<description>Who is winning the football</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is winning the football</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC46</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-296904</link>
		<dc:creator>SC46</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-296904</guid>
		<description>My ass  is back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My ass  is back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-295551</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-295551</guid>
		<description>Breaking news! 

PJ are denying reports that 6 feet long amphibious sardines have been slithering around PDL apartments for years. 

Now this ties in with my alien theory!

Has anybody considered the possibility of one of these sardines slithering into the Clan's apartment?

They leave a kind of common bleach trace on wherever their scales touch. 

There has never been story in the press about these sardines eating children before but it is possible that the Portuguese government has blanketed any press coverage in the past.

Therefore if it was not aliens that ate M it could have been a passing sardine.

Therefore let us not point the finger at the Clan just yet - there is probably a perfectly reasonable reason that M is missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breaking news! </p>
<p>PJ are denying reports that 6 feet long amphibious sardines have been slithering around PDL apartments for years. </p>
<p>Now this ties in with my alien theory!</p>
<p>Has anybody considered the possibility of one of these sardines slithering into the Clan&#8217;s apartment?</p>
<p>They leave a kind of common bleach trace on wherever their scales touch. </p>
<p>There has never been story in the press about these sardines eating children before but it is possible that the Portuguese government has blanketed any press coverage in the past.</p>
<p>Therefore if it was not aliens that ate M it could have been a passing sardine.</p>
<p>Therefore let us not point the finger at the Clan just yet - there is probably a perfectly reasonable reason that M is missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Passing Through</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-295525</link>
		<dc:creator>Passing Through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-295525</guid>
		<description>M&#38;A,
 Post 899 should have been attributed to SKY. So sorry. If I may I would like to repost the corrected versions of my posts on the new blog.. I feel it is important .
Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M&amp;A,<br />
 Post 899 should have been attributed to SKY. So sorry. If I may I would like to repost the corrected versions of my posts on the new blog.. I feel it is important .<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294975</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294975</guid>
		<description>1185 Salomon ES Says:


" You shouldn’t confuse “lack of evidence” with “lack of evidence submitted by the Portuguese prosecution to support the request to the UK authorities”. "

That's right, but it's the latter that matters for bank account details.

" Finally, data such as mobile phone communications and certain bank account details seem to be very standard exchanges between enforcement and policing authorities in different EUc ountries (for example in other crimes such as money laundering, drug traffickin, IP infringements etc.). For your information YOU DO NOT require a rogatory letter to get this data."

In Germany for example, phone communication data are subject to privacy protection. Authorities would only get those data in cases of "severe" crime. There is a list of "severe" crimes, and involuntary homicide, or the equivalents of neglect or conceiling a body, are not in the list. So for the alleged crimes, phone data would not be seizable. For bank account data, I'm not certain about the exact rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1185 Salomon ES Says:</p>
<p>&#8221; You shouldn’t confuse “lack of evidence” with “lack of evidence submitted by the Portuguese prosecution to support the request to the UK authorities”. &#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right, but it&#8217;s the latter that matters for bank account details.</p>
<p>&#8221; Finally, data such as mobile phone communications and certain bank account details seem to be very standard exchanges between enforcement and policing authorities in different EUc ountries (for example in other crimes such as money laundering, drug traffickin, IP infringements etc.). For your information YOU DO NOT require a rogatory letter to get this data.&#8221;</p>
<p>In Germany for example, phone communication data are subject to privacy protection. Authorities would only get those data in cases of &#8220;severe&#8221; crime. There is a list of &#8220;severe&#8221; crimes, and involuntary homicide, or the equivalents of neglect or conceiling a body, are not in the list. So for the alleged crimes, phone data would not be seizable. For bank account data, I&#8217;m not certain about the exact rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294964</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294964</guid>
		<description>Is there a suggestion here that REPORTER's 'news' was in some way valid?

Now we are in the realms of the fantasist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a suggestion here that REPORTER&#8217;s &#8216;news&#8217; was in some way valid?</p>
<p>Now we are in the realms of the fantasist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salomon ES</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294961</link>
		<dc:creator>Salomon ES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294961</guid>
		<description>Ferdinand 1177

I don't know if indeed the MLA's were watered down because of "lack of evidence".  But whatever is your source, I doubt it is a credible one (that's why we come to anorak... because it's the only credible source ;-))

You shouldn't confuse "lack of evidence" with "lack of evidence submitted by the Portuguese prosecution to support the request to the UK authorities".

Finally, data such as mobile phone communications and certain bank account details seem to be very standard exchanges between enforcement and policing authorities in different EUc ountries (for example in other crimes such as money laundering, drug traffickin, IP infringements etc.). For your information YOU DO NOT require a rogatory letter to get this data.

so... overall... I think reporter is really not spot on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ferdinand 1177</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if indeed the MLA&#8217;s were watered down because of &#8220;lack of evidence&#8221;.  But whatever is your source, I doubt it is a credible one (that&#8217;s why we come to anorak&#8230; because it&#8217;s the only credible source ;-))</p>
<p>You shouldn&#8217;t confuse &#8220;lack of evidence&#8221; with &#8220;lack of evidence submitted by the Portuguese prosecution to support the request to the UK authorities&#8221;.</p>
<p>Finally, data such as mobile phone communications and certain bank account details seem to be very standard exchanges between enforcement and policing authorities in different EUc ountries (for example in other crimes such as money laundering, drug traffickin, IP infringements etc.). For your information YOU DO NOT require a rogatory letter to get this data.</p>
<p>so&#8230; overall&#8230; I think reporter is really not spot on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: banned poster</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294940</link>
		<dc:creator>banned poster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294940</guid>
		<description>so agw,  from observer

you all powerful, all omnipotent hero, defender of the unpublished rules and regulations of anorak, have now blocked my ip address from even accessing anorak in read mode. presumably because you are unable to support your pathetic argument against me caused by one teeny weeny posting of info from another sight. 

no wonder others have felt the need to go elsewhere.

bye.


&lt;strong&gt;Administrator: &lt;/strong&gt;Just caught up with this one which a Moderator had held over. It all rather proves the waste of time and space point I was making earlier.  I do not debate in here. If this clown can not see the logic of what has already been said why should I waste my talents in assisting him/her further down the path of dilly-dreams. They come they go, they come back again. Even when you don't want them&lt;strong&gt;-agw&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so agw,  from observer</p>
<p>you all powerful, all omnipotent hero, defender of the unpublished rules and regulations of anorak, have now blocked my ip address from even accessing anorak in read mode. presumably because you are unable to support your pathetic argument against me caused by one teeny weeny posting of info from another sight. </p>
<p>no wonder others have felt the need to go elsewhere.</p>
<p>bye.</p>
<p><strong>Administrator: </strong>Just caught up with this one which a Moderator had held over. It all rather proves the waste of time and space point I was making earlier.  I do not debate in here. If this clown can not see the logic of what has already been said why should I waste my talents in assisting him/her further down the path of dilly-dreams. They come they go, they come back again. Even when you don&#8217;t want them<strong>-agw</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarlett</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294926</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294926</guid>
		<description>----------------
1011
Ferdinand Says:
April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 am

Post 749 holds the key!
-----------------

Elmer's Tune/German submarines am I warm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
1011<br />
Ferdinand Says:<br />
April 22nd, 2008 at 12:46 am</p>
<p>Post 749 holds the key!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Elmer&#8217;s Tune/German submarines am I warm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: can't say no</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294921</link>
		<dc:creator>can't say no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294921</guid>
		<description>1182
Salomon ES 
Ya have to be more carefull
That tipe of posts ,are NOT for this site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1182<br />
Salomon ES<br />
Ya have to be more carefull<br />
That tipe of posts ,are NOT for this site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salomon ES</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294913</link>
		<dc:creator>Salomon ES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294913</guid>
		<description>1170 Noseycow
"The British Government has far bigger things on their mind than the McCanns."

Agree - at least I would have thought so...

But then... when Gordon Brown comes to Lisbon and announces that he'll discuss the case with the Portuguese premier in the eve of signing a EU treaty... when the McCanns are invited to the European Parliament - allegedly by recommendation of David Milliband... when the British ambassador in Lisbon is on the case within 2 hours of MAdeleine being reported missing... when the rogatory letters take 5 months to be approved by the HO....

One wonders...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1170 Noseycow<br />
&#8220;The British Government has far bigger things on their mind than the McCanns.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agree - at least I would have thought so&#8230;</p>
<p>But then&#8230; when Gordon Brown comes to Lisbon and announces that he&#8217;ll discuss the case with the Portuguese premier in the eve of signing a EU treaty&#8230; when the McCanns are invited to the European Parliament - allegedly by recommendation of David Milliband&#8230; when the British ambassador in Lisbon is on the case within 2 hours of MAdeleine being reported missing&#8230; when the rogatory letters take 5 months to be approved by the HO&#8230;.</p>
<p>One wonders&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: can't say no</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294912</link>
		<dc:creator>can't say no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294912</guid>
		<description>1177
Ferdinand 
That’s what I interpret as the element of truth in REPORTER’s contributions
-------------
HAHAHA
Reporter is a reliable poster ,no doubt 
ROFL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1177<br />
Ferdinand<br />
That’s what I interpret as the element of truth in REPORTER’s contributions<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
HAHAHA<br />
Reporter is a reliable poster ,no doubt<br />
ROFL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gandolf</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294911</link>
		<dc:creator>Gandolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294911</guid>
		<description>CSN,that's right I told YOU  last night it was bollox.

Now why is the Rene Hasee mystery such a taboo subject ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSN,that&#8217;s right I told YOU  last night it was bollox.</p>
<p>Now why is the Rene Hasee mystery such a taboo subject ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noseycow</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294907</link>
		<dc:creator>Noseycow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294907</guid>
		<description>new thread - and time i wasn't here.

Brandon - no more doughnuts eh? I got a bikini to get into...  :twisted:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new thread - and time i wasn&#8217;t here.</p>
<p>Brandon - no more doughnuts eh? I got a bikini to get into&#8230;  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif' alt=':twisted:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just_me</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294906</link>
		<dc:creator>Just_me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294906</guid>
		<description>Nosey - pmsl no he is certainly NOT !!!!    I dint think I was in the dog house, now I'm not so sure lol :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nosey - pmsl no he is certainly NOT !!!!    I dint think I was in the dog house, now I&#8217;m not so sure lol <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294905</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294905</guid>
		<description>1132 Salomon ES Says:

" I would find it very strange that the PJ would not have had access to this information already (this is the sort of thing that you’d surely get within weeks after suspecting the doctors - unless of course someone in the british isles is not being very cooperative). "

I thought we had it from a reliable source that the requests for MLA were turned down due to lack of evidence, as far as any compulsory measures were requested. The whole "rogatory letters" myth had finally morphed into some entirely voluntary witness interviews (for which "rogatory letters" would have never been necessary).

That's what I interpret as the element of truth in REPORTER's contributions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1132 Salomon ES Says:</p>
<p>&#8221; I would find it very strange that the PJ would not have had access to this information already (this is the sort of thing that you’d surely get within weeks after suspecting the doctors - unless of course someone in the british isles is not being very cooperative). &#8221;</p>
<p>I thought we had it from a reliable source that the requests for MLA were turned down due to lack of evidence, as far as any compulsory measures were requested. The whole &#8220;rogatory letters&#8221; myth had finally morphed into some entirely voluntary witness interviews (for which &#8220;rogatory letters&#8221; would have never been necessary).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I interpret as the element of truth in REPORTER&#8217;s contributions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salomon ES</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294904</link>
		<dc:creator>Salomon ES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294904</guid>
		<description>1033 Just Me

About Murat still being an arguido. 

The comments I read from the PJ was that until the investigation is concluded there'll be no changes to the status of the current arguido's. (that was in response to Clarence Mitchell's request for them to be lifted the arguido status).

That would apply to the McCanns and to Murat.

The investigation deadline has been extended until August (at least) .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1033 Just Me</p>
<p>About Murat still being an arguido. </p>
<p>The comments I read from the PJ was that until the investigation is concluded there&#8217;ll be no changes to the status of the current arguido&#8217;s. (that was in response to Clarence Mitchell&#8217;s request for them to be lifted the arguido status).</p>
<p>That would apply to the McCanns and to Murat.</p>
<p>The investigation deadline has been extended until August (at least) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noseycow</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294903</link>
		<dc:creator>Noseycow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294903</guid>
		<description>Just_me - are you in the dog house??  Is Alan Mr. Just_me???  :shock:

we should be told...  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just_me - are you in the dog house??  Is Alan Mr. Just_me???  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>we should be told&#8230;  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SC46</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294902</link>
		<dc:creator>SC46</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294902</guid>
		<description>by the way - Jersey police have young persons teeth in the care home...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way - Jersey police have young persons teeth in the care home&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noseycow</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294901</link>
		<dc:creator>Noseycow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183165.html#comment-294901</guid>
		<description>Brandon - was never any good at sharing...  :oops:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon - was never any good at sharing&#8230;  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
