<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: More Secrets And A Rerun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: S Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-316050</link>
		<dc:creator>S Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 12:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-316050</guid>
		<description>My opinion is that the McCanns have so consistently played "innocent" that they have become convinced that they can do no wrong - they are not feeling any guilt over leaving their babies alone, neglecting them even after Maddy asked them why. They are now using their televised appearances to insist forcibly (eg Kate slapping her leg while protesting that it was OK to leave the children) that they have done no wrong. They feel that they are "slandered" when the truth is made public!! (The truth about Maddy asking them why they did not come when Maddy and her sister were crying for a long time). Do they want the truth to be buried so that they can LOOK innocent? Now they do not want to go back to Portugal because they think that they might in that case be charged with child neglect. So... everything is fine for them as long as they remain "innocent"...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion is that the McCanns have so consistently played &#8220;innocent&#8221; that they have become convinced that they can do no wrong - they are not feeling any guilt over leaving their babies alone, neglecting them even after Maddy asked them why. They are now using their televised appearances to insist forcibly (eg Kate slapping her leg while protesting that it was OK to leave the children) that they have done no wrong. They feel that they are &#8220;slandered&#8221; when the truth is made public!! (The truth about Maddy asking them why they did not come when Maddy and her sister were crying for a long time). Do they want the truth to be buried so that they can LOOK innocent? Now they do not want to go back to Portugal because they think that they might in that case be charged with child neglect. So&#8230; everything is fine for them as long as they remain &#8220;innocent&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lone pigeon</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313761</link>
		<dc:creator>lone pigeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313761</guid>
		<description>new thread and guess who's first and second? Yep ME!!! :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new thread and guess who&#8217;s first and second? Yep ME!!! <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chenier</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313750</link>
		<dc:creator>chenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313750</guid>
		<description>Oh look; the Guardian has a piece on the nefarious behaviour of one Pellicano:

'A self-proclaimed "private eye to the stars", Anthony Pellicano, was found guilty yesterday of 76 counts of illegal activity, including unauthorised wiretapping, intimidation and bribing police in a case that laid bare the seedy side of Hollywood. ...The FBI investigation unveiled an enormous criminal network deployed by Pellicano on his clients' behalf. He engaged in widespread wiretapping of conversations, including those of Sylvester Stallone. He bribed police and other officials to run illegal database searches of, among others, Gary Shandling of the Larry Sanders Show fame and the Saturday Night Live actor Kevin Nealon.

The prosecution, which relied on witnesses including Farah Fawcett and Steven Segal, presented the jury with evidence of racketeering and death threats. '


Gosh, who do we know with alleged expertise in such activities?

Step forward, in handcuffs, Marco's Mummy! And indeed, though without handcuffs, another 4 members of M3, all charged with phonetapping, after a raid on their offices provided  handguns, ammunition, listening equipment, cassettes and transcripts of taped phone calls. 

Of course, the case against Metodo 3 was thrown out because of police entrapment.

Though the much later charges  of stealing 400kg of cocaine against Jimenez, who was said to be leading Metodo 3's search for Madeleine in Morocco,  seem to be standing up.

That's a promising line of enquiry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh look; the Guardian has a piece on the nefarious behaviour of one Pellicano:</p>
<p>&#8216;A self-proclaimed &#8220;private eye to the stars&#8221;, Anthony Pellicano, was found guilty yesterday of 76 counts of illegal activity, including unauthorised wiretapping, intimidation and bribing police in a case that laid bare the seedy side of Hollywood. &#8230;The FBI investigation unveiled an enormous criminal network deployed by Pellicano on his clients&#8217; behalf. He engaged in widespread wiretapping of conversations, including those of Sylvester Stallone. He bribed police and other officials to run illegal database searches of, among others, Gary Shandling of the Larry Sanders Show fame and the Saturday Night Live actor Kevin Nealon.</p>
<p>The prosecution, which relied on witnesses including Farah Fawcett and Steven Segal, presented the jury with evidence of racketeering and death threats. &#8216;</p>
<p>Gosh, who do we know with alleged expertise in such activities?</p>
<p>Step forward, in handcuffs, Marco&#8217;s Mummy! And indeed, though without handcuffs, another 4 members of M3, all charged with phonetapping, after a raid on their offices provided  handguns, ammunition, listening equipment, cassettes and transcripts of taped phone calls. </p>
<p>Of course, the case against Metodo 3 was thrown out because of police entrapment.</p>
<p>Though the much later charges  of stealing 400kg of cocaine against Jimenez, who was said to be leading Metodo 3&#8217;s search for Madeleine in Morocco,  seem to be standing up.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a promising line of enquiry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justlooking</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313745</link>
		<dc:creator>Justlooking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313745</guid>
		<description>333

Jo

Oh I forgot- and the " pixie dust ".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>333</p>
<p>Jo</p>
<p>Oh I forgot- and the &#8221; pixie dust &#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justlooking</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313744</link>
		<dc:creator>Justlooking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313744</guid>
		<description>333

Jo

So they will dodge &#38; delay as much as possible.

IMO it would be quicker &#38; perhaps easier for the PJ to reconstruct Maddie than the day in question with this bunch!  Let's see, DNA sample , a few stem cells, a bucket, a wooden spoon, then say the magic words....woof woof!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>333</p>
<p>Jo</p>
<p>So they will dodge &amp; delay as much as possible.</p>
<p>IMO it would be quicker &amp; perhaps easier for the PJ to reconstruct Maddie than the day in question with this bunch!  Let&#8217;s see, DNA sample , a few stem cells, a bucket, a wooden spoon, then say the magic words&#8230;.woof woof!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313743</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313743</guid>
		<description>Bye for now
Must go
See you later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bye for now<br />
Must go<br />
See you later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313742</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313742</guid>
		<description>330
Carmen Says: 

They probably do this in real life,as well ,cyberlife is just an extension.
Unfortunately,they are trolls in cyberlife and train spotters in real life.....sad sad people,getting pleasure out the hurt they proportion to others.
I prefer stay out of their way amd do stay out
There are too many of them,too many :evil:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>330<br />
Carmen Says: </p>
<p>They probably do this in real life,as well ,cyberlife is just an extension.<br />
Unfortunately,they are trolls in cyberlife and train spotters in real life&#8230;..sad sad people,getting pleasure out the hurt they proportion to others.<br />
I prefer stay out of their way amd do stay out<br />
There are too many of them,too many <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_evil.gif' alt=':evil:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313741</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313741</guid>
		<description>331
Justlooking 
No,not conned.
The reconstruction is part of the petition in the rogatory letters and has been approved by the Home Office as much as the interviews in the UK.
It is ONLY the mccanns again who are behaving as usual: immature and capricious because it is obvious they are s.... scared,as  the reconstruction can only bring new evidence or at least show all their lies and inconsistancies in their declarations.They CANT escape
Read the mccannsfiles,the best site  imo :smile:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>331<br />
Justlooking<br />
No,not conned.<br />
The reconstruction is part of the petition in the rogatory letters and has been approved by the Home Office as much as the interviews in the UK.<br />
It is ONLY the mccanns again who are behaving as usual: immature and capricious because it is obvious they are s&#8230;. scared,as  the reconstruction can only bring new evidence or at least show all their lies and inconsistancies in their declarations.They CANT escape<br />
Read the mccannsfiles,the best site  imo <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':smile:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chenier</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313740</link>
		<dc:creator>chenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313740</guid>
		<description>330
Carmen Says: 

May 16th, 2008 at 9:17 am 
Jo

You and me both. I would love to meet a real life troll. I often wonder who these people are who can waste hours of their life trying to wreck another site. What for? 

Verbal graffiti artists, but what on earth do they get out of it? 

What sad gap in their lives is filled by trying to destroy someone else’s pleasure?

-----------------------------------------------------------

The problem is that there is that whilst there is some very good graffiti around, the verbal graffiti of specus trollus is of another calibre.

The sad gap is in the brain of specus trollus...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>330<br />
Carmen Says: </p>
<p>May 16th, 2008 at 9:17 am<br />
Jo</p>
<p>You and me both. I would love to meet a real life troll. I often wonder who these people are who can waste hours of their life trying to wreck another site. What for? </p>
<p>Verbal graffiti artists, but what on earth do they get out of it? </p>
<p>What sad gap in their lives is filled by trying to destroy someone else’s pleasure?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>The problem is that there is that whilst there is some very good graffiti around, the verbal graffiti of specus trollus is of another calibre.</p>
<p>The sad gap is in the brain of specus trollus&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justlooking</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313737</link>
		<dc:creator>Justlooking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313737</guid>
		<description>Are we being re-conned into thinking that they will return to PT?  Sounds like the lie detector PR stunt, with impossible caveats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we being re-conned into thinking that they will return to PT?  Sounds like the lie detector PR stunt, with impossible caveats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313735</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313735</guid>
		<description>Jo

You and me both. I would love to meet a real life troll. I often wonder who these people are who can waste hours of their life trying to wreck another site. What for? 

Verbal graffiti artists, but what on earth do they get out of it? 

What sad gap in their lives is filled by trying to destroy someone else's pleasure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jo</p>
<p>You and me both. I would love to meet a real life troll. I often wonder who these people are who can waste hours of their life trying to wreck another site. What for? </p>
<p>Verbal graffiti artists, but what on earth do they get out of it? </p>
<p>What sad gap in their lives is filled by trying to destroy someone else&#8217;s pleasure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313734</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313734</guid>
		<description>326
suzi 
Thanks for the link.There are lots of article around this issue and ....NO official news.
I tend to believe the PJ left the UK so abruptly because they had the DNA results from Birmingham and did not need to question more people not anything.I may be wrong of course but it wouldnt surprise me
It is not for nothing they have been turned into prime suspects is it?and it is not only because they didnt answer some burning questions.There is much more to it,I am sure.
Welll....soon we will know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>326<br />
suzi<br />
Thanks for the link.There are lots of article around this issue and &#8230;.NO official news.<br />
I tend to believe the PJ left the UK so abruptly because they had the DNA results from Birmingham and did not need to question more people not anything.I may be wrong of course but it wouldnt surprise me<br />
It is not for nothing they have been turned into prime suspects is it?and it is not only because they didnt answer some burning questions.There is much more to it,I am sure.<br />
Welll&#8230;.soon we will know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313733</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313733</guid>
		<description>M and A

There is a lengthy thread in there slagging us off, its discourteous of them to leave it there, had it been posted here it would have been removed.
Most respectable sites do not encourage posters to vilify other sites
Also some of the members flooded Anorak with irrelevant and pointless links and site information

******************
Ok....an other waste of time I see.I really wonder why people bother and I wonder how they are in real life.Hopefully not lkike in cyberlife?  :shock:
Thanks for the clarriefication</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M and A</p>
<p>There is a lengthy thread in there slagging us off, its discourteous of them to leave it there, had it been posted here it would have been removed.<br />
Most respectable sites do not encourage posters to vilify other sites<br />
Also some of the members flooded Anorak with irrelevant and pointless links and site information</p>
<p>******************<br />
Ok&#8230;.an other waste of time I see.I really wonder why people bother and I wonder how they are in real life.Hopefully not lkike in cyberlife?  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Thanks for the clarriefication</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313730</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313730</guid>
		<description>323
brandon flours Says: 
May 16th, 2008 at 8:37 am e
Carmen

Noted, surely its okay if you say its from that site and not your own stuff? or not 

************************

What would be the point?
This isn't an information kiosk for McCann stories. It's a site set up so that you can express your own opinion on news stories, within the legal bounds. 
If you have something to say, we will provide the bandwidth for you to say it, why should we provide the bandwidth for you to repeat someone else's opinion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>323<br />
brandon flours Says:<br />
May 16th, 2008 at 8:37 am e<br />
Carmen</p>
<p>Noted, surely its okay if you say its from that site and not your own stuff? or not </p>
<p>************************</p>
<p>What would be the point?<br />
This isn&#8217;t an information kiosk for McCann stories. It&#8217;s a site set up so that you can express your own opinion on news stories, within the legal bounds.<br />
If you have something to say, we will provide the bandwidth for you to say it, why should we provide the bandwidth for you to repeat someone else&#8217;s opinion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suzi</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313729</link>
		<dc:creator>suzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313729</guid>
		<description>Hi all, long time no see.  Just read the link below - makes interesting reading.

they got some further forensic detail here.....

http://www.gameshout.com/madeleine_mccann/forensics_point_towards_parents/article2072.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, long time no see.  Just read the link below - makes interesting reading.</p>
<p>they got some further forensic detail here&#8230;..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gameshout.com/madeleine_mccann/forensics_point_towards_parents/article2072.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gameshout.com/madeleine_mccann/forensics_point_towards_parents/article2072.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313728</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313728</guid>
		<description>Last time I ask this question:I have asked at least 3 times :  why has the PJ shortened its stay in the UK and left so abruptly?

Brandon,to be able to read article on 3As,one must register.
What is all that fuss about this site anyhow?
Did I miss some "fun",gossip......?I undertsand something was going on but never looked into it because I definitively dislike those "cyberfights".May bb M&#38;A can clarrify? Thnank you

M and A

There is a lengthy thread in there slagging us off, its discourteous of them to leave it there, had it been posted here it would have been removed.
Most respectable sites do not encourage posters to vilify other sites
Also some of the members flooded Anorak with irrelevant and pointless links and site information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time I ask this question:I have asked at least 3 times :  why has the PJ shortened its stay in the UK and left so abruptly?</p>
<p>Brandon,to be able to read article on 3As,one must register.<br />
What is all that fuss about this site anyhow?<br />
Did I miss some &#8220;fun&#8221;,gossip&#8230;&#8230;?I undertsand something was going on but never looked into it because I definitively dislike those &#8220;cyberfights&#8221;.May bb M&amp;A can clarrify? Thnank you</p>
<p>M and A</p>
<p>There is a lengthy thread in there slagging us off, its discourteous of them to leave it there, had it been posted here it would have been removed.<br />
Most respectable sites do not encourage posters to vilify other sites<br />
Also some of the members flooded Anorak with irrelevant and pointless links and site information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandon flours</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313727</link>
		<dc:creator>brandon flours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313727</guid>
		<description>BBL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandon flours</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313726</link>
		<dc:creator>brandon flours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313726</guid>
		<description>Carmen

Noted, surely its okay if you say its from that site and not your own stuff? or not :???:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carmen</p>
<p>Noted, surely its okay if you say its from that site and not your own stuff? or not <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':???:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313721</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313721</guid>
		<description>Brandon Flours

We haven't asked that you don't mention other sites BF, just that you don't cut and paste direct comments from other sites that may be copyright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon Flours</p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t asked that you don&#8217;t mention other sites BF, just that you don&#8217;t cut and paste direct comments from other sites that may be copyright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313719</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/183904.html#comment-313719</guid>
		<description>What a bore they are..... :evil:

They DO NOT want to be in the media,dont they?

16/05/08 
McCanns sue a Portuguese Newspaper for Headline publication: “PJ believes parents killed Maddie”



http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/05/mccanns-sue-portuguese-newspaper-for.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bore they are&#8230;.. <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_evil.gif' alt=':evil:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>They DO NOT want to be in the media,dont they?</p>
<p>16/05/08<br />
McCanns sue a Portuguese Newspaper for Headline publication: “PJ believes parents killed Maddie”</p>
<p><a href="http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/05/mccanns-sue-portuguese-newspaper-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/05/mccanns-sue-portuguese-newspaper-for.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
