Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Bobby Hands, Cannes And A Hunger For Publicity http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html Tabloid news for broadsheet readers Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:07:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: False Flag http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320265 False Flag Wed, 28 May 2008 01:04:23 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320265 481 Saul said: "You girls should be watching Doris Lessing on BBC 2" Brilliant wasn't it ? Love her............ 481 Saul said:

“You girls should be watching Doris Lessing on BBC 2″

Brilliant wasn’t it ? Love her…………

]]> By: False Flag http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320264 False Flag Wed, 28 May 2008 00:36:24 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320264 456: "I remember ita!!!" I remember phonetics before ita was ever heard of............before 'Janet and John' who slightly pre-dated 'Peter and Jane'. Phonetics on flash cards had me reading full size story books within a few weeks of starting school ! ____________________________________ m&a I remember Dick and Fanny with great fondness -meercat 456:

“I remember ita!!!”

I remember phonetics before ita was ever heard of…………before ‘Janet and John’ who slightly pre-dated ‘Peter and Jane’.

Phonetics on flash cards had me reading full size story books within a few weeks of starting school !

____________________________________
m&a
I remember Dick and Fanny with great fondness
-meercat

]]> By: annie1 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320263 annie1 Wed, 28 May 2008 00:29:28 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320263 maybe not voluntarily - but if they were ordered to return, then I cant think of a reason why they could refuse to go. Cooperation between European police forces is, in my opinion, a lot stronger than we know maybe not voluntarily - but if they were ordered to return, then I cant think of a reason why they could refuse to go. Cooperation between European police forces is, in my opinion, a lot stronger than we know

]]> By: freddie http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320262 freddie Wed, 28 May 2008 00:25:25 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320262 558 annie1 Says: May 28th, 2008 at 1:22 am freddie - never say never - they have not yet! I dont think they will ever get the chance to now...the Mc's aint going anywhere near pdl again. 558
annie1 Says:

May 28th, 2008 at 1:22 am
freddie - never say never - they have not yet!

I dont think they will ever get the chance to now…the Mc’s aint going anywhere near pdl again.

]]> By: annie1 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320261 annie1 Wed, 28 May 2008 00:22:00 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320261 freddie - never say never - they have not yet! freddie - never say never - they have not yet!

]]> By: freddie http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320260 freddie Wed, 28 May 2008 00:21:06 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320260 the pj have made only ONE mistake imo....not arresting and charging the fragrant duo. the pj have made only ONE mistake imo….not arresting and charging the fragrant duo.

]]> By: annie1 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320259 annie1 Wed, 28 May 2008 00:08:28 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320259 in my opinion - the pj have left no stone unturned. The last stone was to be the reconstruction - and the McCanns and their friends have refused to let it be turned, maybe because they know exactly what that stone would reveal. The pj now have a clear and concise picture of the way the McLot work and will do what they have to do. They have give the Mcs&Co every oportuntity to repeat the events of the fatal nights and by refusing to do so will be the final nail. By now, I would think that the pj know exactly what charges, if any, can be brought against the McTapas, and will either close the case as unsolved or make their charges. There is really nothing more that can be done, is there? If the McLot have chosen to not allow a further revival of the events of may 3 - even if it had brought forward the remotest bit of new evidence - they chose not to allow it. In my opinion, we should all say a prayer for Madeleine, let the pj do what they have to do, and if after all this time it amounts to nothing - then let the McCs get on with their pathetic lives, in the knowledge that regardless of the truth being revealed - they contributed 100% to the disappearance of their daughter, by neglect. in my opinion - the pj have left no stone unturned. The last stone was to be the reconstruction - and the McCanns and their friends have refused to let it be turned, maybe because they know exactly what that stone would reveal. The pj now have a clear and concise picture of the way the McLot work and will do what they have to do. They have give the Mcs&Co every oportuntity to repeat the events of the fatal nights and by refusing to do so will be the final nail. By now, I would think that the pj know exactly what charges, if any, can be brought against the McTapas, and will either close the case as unsolved or make their charges. There is really nothing more that can be done, is there? If the McLot have chosen to not allow a further revival of the events of may 3 - even if it had brought forward the remotest bit of new evidence - they chose not to allow it. In my opinion, we should all say a prayer for Madeleine, let the pj do what they have to do, and if after all this time it amounts to nothing - then let the McCs get on with their pathetic lives, in the knowledge that regardless of the truth being revealed - they contributed 100% to the disappearance of their daughter, by neglect.

]]> By: False Flag http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320257 False Flag Tue, 27 May 2008 23:59:26 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320257 Totje 428: "this [if true] prooves they couldn’t convince a Portuguese judge to release the info/things." Yes but I suspect that thyere may very well be reasons for this decision beyond what will ever be admitted........Likewise the decision to refuse to charge with neglect before the arguidos left P. Not imo because of insufficient evidence..........but I speculate, of course ! Totje 428:

“this [if true] prooves they couldn’t convince a Portuguese judge to release the info/things.”

Yes but I suspect that thyere may very well be reasons for this decision beyond what will ever be admitted……..Likewise the decision to refuse to charge with neglect before the arguidos left P. Not imo because of insufficient evidence……….but I speculate, of course !

]]> By: sam http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320256 sam Tue, 27 May 2008 23:57:49 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320256 548 chenier Says: May 28th, 2008 at 12:27 am EEk; have just looked at the time, and realised that I too should get some sleep. Good night all… me too! good night :) 548
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 12:27 am
EEk; have just looked at the time, and realised that I too should get some sleep.
Good night all…

me too! good night :)

]]> By: sam http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320255 sam Tue, 27 May 2008 23:52:39 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320255 502 Fair Says: May 27th, 2008 at 11:28 pm Sam & Totje I assume (?) the numbers keep changing as we have probably been invaded again? Do you think? no, i think it was due to some posts being held in mod ? confusing anyway. 502
Fair Says:
May 27th, 2008 at 11:28 pm
Sam & Totje
I assume (?) the numbers keep changing as we have probably been invaded again?
Do you think?

no, i think it was due to some posts being held in mod ? confusing anyway.

]]> By: sam http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320254 sam Tue, 27 May 2008 23:51:26 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320254 500 Totje Says: May 27th, 2008 at 11:27 pm we will see, i'm certainly interested in reading it. 500
Totje Says:
May 27th, 2008 at 11:27 pm

we will see, i’m certainly interested in reading it.

]]> By: sam http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320253 sam Tue, 27 May 2008 23:49:09 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320253 489 chenier Says: May 27th, 2008 at 11:13 pm perhaps they had permission to log the calls and as such it would be admissible to court ? 489
chenier Says:
May 27th, 2008 at 11:13 pm

perhaps they had permission to log the calls and as such it would be admissible to court ?

]]> By: sam http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320251 sam Tue, 27 May 2008 23:46:54 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320251 488 Totje Says: May 27th, 2008 at 11:10 pm 484 sam Thanks. But if that’s true, why on earth didn’t the pj ask permission immediately after the event? They should know the law regarding that. And [if it’s true] we should also dismiss the reports in the papers that the pj assisted by British cops already evaluated the phone calls, triangulations etc. it's a mystery to me totje. 488
Totje Says:
May 27th, 2008 at 11:10 pm
484
sam
Thanks. But if that’s true, why on earth didn’t the pj ask permission immediately after the event? They should know the law regarding that.
And [if it’s true] we should also dismiss the reports in the papers that the pj assisted by British cops already evaluated the phone calls, triangulations etc.

it’s a mystery to me totje.

]]> By: Maria http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320245 Maria Tue, 27 May 2008 23:28:32 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320245 chenier BTW, I would have absolutely no objection to being asked to give links for everything if the same rule applied to everyone. But ade was allowed to say GM was not ALLOWED to see patients without giving any serious evidence at all. I'm aware that M and A can't keep up with everything, and I only joked with Duncan R about it, but, although all are equal, some do sometimes at least appear to be more equal than others. IMHO! BTW again, I think, if you look at the video clip of the Mcs going into the chamber in Brussels, you will see that it is Paul Tuohy (Missing People) who walks in with them, as well as CM. He looks rather like CM, actually, and is wearing the yellow ribbon (Missing People) in his lapel. I am not certain that it is him but I think so. If you compare his pic on the Missing People site with this clip, it does look very like him, with same ribbon! The Missing People site does say he was going to Brussels. The clip can be found on the Edward McMillan Scott website by following his news entries. Of course you are correct in saying that they also say it is difficult to judge the effectiveness of child alert systems but I think they still want MEPs to sign the declaration. In fact, some of the difficulty in using current systems arises from the lack of consistency across countries. I'm pretty sure they have been supporting this measure for a long time. I am trying to find out for certain. McMillan Scott claims the measure has the support of both PACT and Missing People but that may not be conclusive, although it's a dangerous thing for him to say if it's not true. He is, of course, sponsoring the Mcs' declaration! I have a colleague who disappeared some time ago and whose family have received excellent support from Missing People, although, as yet, to no avail. No trace. No body. Never came home. No known reason. I agree that some of the aims as given on their website seem contradictory. I suppose it's all in the individual cases.... Definitely "Good night!" to all now. Mods and Admin Maria its all in the archives about Gerry returning to work and the hours, and the conditions applied, thats why Ade was allowed to post it source free chenier

BTW, I would have absolutely no objection to being asked to give links for everything if the same rule applied to everyone.

But ade was allowed to say GM was not ALLOWED to see patients without giving any serious evidence at all.

I’m aware that M and A can’t keep up with everything, and I only joked with Duncan R about it, but, although all are equal, some do sometimes at least appear to be more equal than others. IMHO!

BTW again, I think, if you look at the video clip of the Mcs going into the chamber in Brussels, you will see that it is Paul Tuohy (Missing People) who walks in with them, as well as CM. He looks rather like CM, actually, and is wearing the yellow ribbon (Missing People) in his lapel. I am not certain that it is him but I think so. If you compare his pic on the Missing People site with this clip, it does look very like him, with same ribbon! The Missing People site does say he was going to Brussels.

The clip can be found on the Edward McMillan Scott website by following his news entries.

Of course you are correct in saying that they also say it is difficult to judge the effectiveness of child alert systems but I think they still want MEPs to sign the declaration. In fact, some of the difficulty in using current systems arises from the lack of consistency across countries. I’m pretty sure they have been supporting this measure for a long time. I am trying to find out for certain. McMillan Scott claims the measure has the support of both PACT and Missing People but that may not be conclusive, although it’s a dangerous thing for him to say if it’s not true. He is, of course, sponsoring the Mcs’ declaration!

I have a colleague who disappeared some time ago and whose family have received excellent support from Missing People, although, as yet, to no avail. No trace. No body. Never came home. No known reason.

I agree that some of the aims as given on their website seem contradictory. I suppose it’s all in the individual cases….

Definitely “Good night!” to all now.

Mods and Admin

Maria its all in the archives about Gerry returning to work and the hours, and the conditions applied, thats why Ade was allowed to post it source free

]]> By: chenier http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320244 chenier Tue, 27 May 2008 23:27:49 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320244 EEk; have just looked at the time, and realised that I too should get some sleep. Good night all... EEk; have just looked at the time, and realised that I too should get some sleep.

Good night all…

]]> By: chenier http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320243 chenier Tue, 27 May 2008 23:24:47 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320243 543 Totje Says: May 28th, 2008 at 12:19 am 537 chenier ------------------------ Of course! Sleep well... 543
Totje Says:

May 28th, 2008 at 12:19 am
537
chenier

————————

Of course!

Sleep well…

]]> By: sam http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320242 sam Tue, 27 May 2008 23:24:00 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320242 479 val Says: May 27th, 2008 at 10:52 pm 467 sam 'I don”t want to get into an argument over this, but I”m no good at finding stuff, if you can find the Application Form and maybe exactly how much the grant is worth, be my guest, I”m no good at stuff like that and wouldn”t know where to start. Maybe Gerry”s blog for the Grant, he would be bound to write about it.' val me neither, sorry if it comes across like that. i know what the grant is worth, it was ca 145 000. but i'll look. 479
val Says:
May 27th, 2008 at 10:52 pm
467 sam
‘I don”t want to get into an argument over this, but I”m no good at finding stuff, if you can find the Application Form and maybe exactly how much the grant is worth, be my
guest, I”m no good at stuff like that and wouldn”t know where to start. Maybe Gerry”s
blog for the Grant, he would be bound to write about it.’

val me neither, sorry if it comes across like that. i know what the grant is worth, it was ca 145 000. but i’ll look.

]]> By: Fair http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320241 Fair Tue, 27 May 2008 23:23:06 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320241 538 Totje You caught me :wink: They promised to go back. Ask them to go back. For a recon...just them. To hep with answering some questions. Anything. Then if they make more excuses they will really show their true colours.....to everyone? Sounds simple? It is. imo. Night Elli Lou x 538 Totje
You caught me :wink:

They promised to go back.
Ask them to go back.
For a recon…just them.
To hep with answering some questions.
Anything.
Then if they make more excuses they will really show their true colours…..to everyone?
Sounds simple?
It is. imo.

Night Elli Lou x

]]> By: Totje http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320240 Totje Tue, 27 May 2008 23:21:58 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320240 Sorry I forgot: Yampster? Sorry I forgot:

Yampster?

]]> By: Totje http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320237 Totje Tue, 27 May 2008 23:19:16 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/184311.html#comment-320237 537 chenier Do you mind if I answer tomorrow? Puppy is imitating a shredder so I have to feed him and walk him [and clean the mess]. And get some sleep. Night all. 537
chenier

Do you mind if I answer tomorrow?
Puppy is imitating a shredder so I have to feed him and walk him [and clean the mess].
And get some sleep.

Night all.

]]>