Sam, I regularly text and phone my cllients in Europe and US and Canada with no prior arrangements by them
_________________
Just ran across this - maybe if you are in Europe but over here with most of the cellphone companies you have to pay a much larger monthly charge to have the ability to use it in Europe or have it activated for international use when ready to travel. I myself when traveling to Europe go without because I refuse to pay the extra charge on my monthly bill. When some lawyers I know from here travel to Europe they carry international phones which are given to them by their firm and returned when they return to the States. Text though yes I can do over to the UK on my regular cell phone but not when over there.

Mods and Admin

Cheryl, the conversation was about texting and phoning from the UK (UK registered mobiles) to UK registered mobiles in Europe and the US & Canada. It can’t be done in some countries but can in others if the PIN is changed

I think Clarence said that in relation to the time at the Tapas Bar May 3.

Spinning why the Timelines may have been “a bit” out.

Though the PJ may know….sadly…I am not privy to their innermost
thoughts on the matter.

Am sure we will know in time, though.

Yes….they seem to have an odd attitude to mobiles…at least many
differing tales about them.

“No Valuables have been lost”…..Oh dear….a foot in mouth statement
of the highest level.

‘Odd that 10 mobiles between 9 people. I would expect with all the stuff you have to carry for babies and toddlers that a maximun of 1 would suffice per couple.’

haven’t i just read somewhere that most of their friends, according to gerry, didn’t have mobiles ?

Any link ?

Teasing.

Thank you for that….although I have read that the answers Dr G P gave
were “No Comments” mainly.

Yes….Dr K’s…alleged outburst…quoted by her sister-in-law…is rather
strange…if it is a true quote.

Mind you….during that period….a lot of quotes from “sources” on the
McCann side of the family were very insistant upon stressing her “raging”,
and her tendency to “incandescence” behaviour, etc.

Odd.

Absence makes the heart grow jealous if your loved one is PLAYING happy families!

Only there’s a poor pigeon all on his lonesome on the new thread

Take it Lone must have had his wings clipped, ahhh bless!!
Have a good weekend all, not too sunny in Sunderland
Nothing a Single Barrel Jack Daniels can’t solve

> I heard the Portuguese lawyer of the McCanns on Portuguese radio last year confirming that the McCanns DID NOT ask to become arguidos and that Gerry answered all his questions and Kate failed to answer SOME questions.(the right to remain silent naturally assists the arguidos).

> What I find more intriguing in the vanity fair article (which I didn’t read the full version) is the final part of the discussion between Kate and the police officer.
When Kate is told that she would become “arguida” in the portuguese sense of the word, she immediately jumps to the conclusion that the police think that she killed Madeleine. If this is what happened, does anyone else find this strange. The police says “you’re a suspect” -and you immediately think you’re a suspect of killing your daughter? Surely most people would think suspicion of a hoax or something else… but murder?

v. strange.

Odd that 10 mobiles between 9 people. I would expect with all the stuff you have to carry for babies and toddlers that a maximun of 1 would suffice per couple.

Just_me was around about a week ago. Like C & C said perhaps half-term keeping her busy?

Apparently, last sighting of Brandon - she was heading to a barbie next door with some Australian hunks. She may be gone some time!

I wonder if the McCann’s had this mysterious person on their Personal List
of “witnesses” to be interviewed by Police on their behalf of the Defence.

Guess that would restrict many. and there’s nothing new to discuss anyway….. just rumour and more rumour. No facts.

‘Madeleine McCann’s parents investigated for neglect Times 29/5/2008
The request for access to the messages was rejected by instructional judge Pedro Frias at the court in Portimão. He said it would breach the right to privacy and that Portuguese law did not allow for the retrospective interception of telephone calls.’

Time to question this law! In the past week there is a sense that at least 2 possible sources of evidence have been denied to the investigation - the phone message content and the results of the reconstruction. But at least it seems that some of the phone evidence is available i.e. ‘complete listings of all telephone traffic to calls made to and from numbers between April 28, when the group arrived in Portugal, and September 9, when the McCanns left the country.’ and ‘details of the locations of the mobile telephones’. There is no mention that access to this evidence has been denied.
I’m not sure where this leaves the investigation but at least some journalists like Gaunt and Kelvin McKensie are beginning to say that their jury is out over the Tapas 9 non-cooperation over the reMcCon. The media created the illusion of the Mc-unquestionability, so imo it’s time they posed some of the public’s questions.

‘No “corrections” have been made by Vanity Fair…nor have they been sued.
Clarence is, as usual, spinning.’

possibly in more senses than one by now, is there an evil grin icon ?

‘Also interesting re the Vanity Fair interviews…Dr K was not interviewed at
all…..all “quotes” about what she “said”, whenever, made by TeamMates. :)’

yes:)

Are Brandon and Just-me still around?

Nosey has not been blocked from posting to Anorak

Think she may just be taking some time out ?

‘more patience required then?’

apparently so.