Madeleine McCann: Time Out
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
TIME OUT: A review of Gone Baby Gone, an average made-for-TV-style film which hinges on its star turn - no, not Ben Affleck, Madeleine McCann:
(Due to superficial resemblances to the Madeleine McCann kidnapping case, ‘Gone Baby Gone’ was withdrawn from the London Film Festival last year and pushed back from its original December release date.)
Fact and fiction - you get them confused?
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:12 pm
1st?!
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:13 pm
Hm … shall I try and do a Lone Pigeon?
2nd!
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:13 pm
3rd
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:14 pm
4th
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:14 pm
5th …. 6th … 7th … 8th …9th … 10th!
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Not that I have much to comment on this [yet]
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Wouldn’t want you to be lonely Châtelaine………………
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Confuse fact and fiction? never! some call it faction, I call it the MM threads
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:25 pm
Hello Carmen!
Hi June!
Went back to the other thread to see if something happening there. Nope…
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Shall we discuss the case entre nous as long as the others are over there
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:29 pm
I think that IF no one really checked on their kids regularly [rumor has it McCs didn't check at all that night] such would point to either
- an abductor indeed
- or a fatal sickness or accident while they were away for hours
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:32 pm
Because IF something would have happened before [accidental death or manslaughter] they would have been fanatically and frequently “checking” all the time, every 15 mins even maybe, to “proof” later on that it must have been an intruder …
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:34 pm
Then the whole “cover-up” would only have been lying about the frequency of checks and to try and avoid accusations of [criminal] neglect.
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:36 pm
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:37 pm
Having said that, this does off course not fit with all circumstantial evidence the PJ is supposed to have, including Lord Eddie and the scent of death in the apartment, the car and on Kate’s clothes, as well as the fact that the news about the abduction was spread at the speed of lightning at a moment she might still be found within hours after having wondered off …
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Ah! I was just about to get a mirror and look at it while talking to myself
I do that a lot by the way, talking to myself, but I’ve never before been writing to myself
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Time out or game over?
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:40 pm
I should try that more often, though. Very relaxed to write without interventions…
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:42 pm
15
Châtelaine
Once for ever
“They have no part in Madeleine”s disappearance”
Apart that G said “find the body and prove we”ve killed her”….he “sold” himself to the PJ,that retard because at that level of the investigation the PJ was reserved and not saying anything…
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:43 pm
I hope it’s soon “game over”, Jo. Otherwise I’ll get myself a detective book again and finally read a story with en “ending” …
Serious, no, I cannot imagine that after all this time the PJ would not eb able to bring this case to an end.
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:46 pm
19
jo Says:
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:42 pm
****
And K : “How can you think I murdered my own daughter” …
I think that all of them have become aware that the more they use the rope… Hence a deafening silence.
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:56 pm
poor maddy
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:58 pm
Carmen
How are you?
June 3rd, 2008 at 5:00 pm
22
Rosemarie Says:
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:56 pm
poor maddy
indeed.
June 3rd, 2008 at 5:02 pm
Do any of you smart alecks know who the man in the picture is?
http://www.truthformadeleine.com/playground.htm
June 3rd, 2008 at 5:03 pm
well still no news, it looks like it’s going to dust, the papers reduced to half columns of trip like yesterday and we’re rehashing over and over again the oddities and many inconsistancies. i hope the pj at least are making more progress.
June 3rd, 2008 at 5:03 pm
21
Châtelaine
Very sick people
The PJ has left them drown themselves,not an unusual strategy,though.
I had not time to do more reading today but do you know if there are any reaction ithe uk?
Gone to check
June 3rd, 2008 at 5:04 pm
25
Lawener
One of your friends ?
Posting under an other name are we?
June 3rd, 2008 at 5:05 pm
25
Lawener Says:
June 3rd, 2008 at 5:02 pm
Do any of you smart alecks know who the man in the picture is?
http://www.truthformadeleine.com/playground.htm
no, but i have a vague memory of it being discussed/rumoured many months ago that he was some sort of security guy.
June 3rd, 2008 at 5:08 pm
jo - don’t be so silly. I’ve only got one name. And I still would like to know the name of the man in the picture.