Madeleine McCann: Tourist Has New Pictures Of Tapas 7 For Sale
PAULO Reis has published an interesting piece of information on the Madeleine McCann case on his site. Read on:
“McCann case: 24 pictures that may help to re-open the case
A tourist who was (allegedly) at the Tapas Bar, on the night of May 3, took several pictures where the table with the McCanns and their friends is visible.
The tourist was with his wife and another couple and they took pictures from each other, with the McCann table on the background.
The owner of the pictures is (said to be) negotiating with several British newspapers to sell the rights for an exclusive publication, but with a condition: before being published, the pictures must be sent to the Portuguese police.
The tourist is well aware that the pictures may have important evidence related with a crime and not sending it to police is considered also a crime, in his country.
Yesterday, a well known legal office from UK (allegedly) knew about the existence of those pictures and contacted the owner, offering to buy all pictures for 600,000 Euros. But the British lawyers didn’t accept the condition set by the owner – that the pictures should be sent to the Portuguese police, just before the transaction. The lawyers’ office wanted to be free to choose the moment when the pictures would be send to Portuguese authorities, so the offer was refused by the tourist.“
The original article is here: http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2008/08/mccann-case-24-pictures-that-may-help.html
Wrires Carmen:
Assuming that the above is true and genuine, it begs the question, when exactly did ‘British lawyers’ feel that they were able to dictate when information in a criminal case should be handed over to the police? Is Madeleine not a Ward of Court, are they not officers of the court? Do they not have a duty to the court - the British court - not just the Portuguese court, to instantly hand over any information that may be pertinent to solving the riddle of what happened to Madeleine.
I have mixed feelings regarding the purchase of information when it is done by newspapers, but is this a new era, that information is being purchased by lawyers, who then decide what to do with it?
Why has the tourist not come forward before?
What or whom, is, or is not, in those photographs that makes them worth 600,000 euros.
Where is the 600,000 euros coming from - the last we heard the McCann Find Madeleine fund was down to it’s last 480,000 euros.So it could not possibly be the legal firm involved with the McCann Fund…could it?
One other question would be if the tourist sold the pictures to a legal firm intent on suppression - would the gent have his collar felt?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:15 am
Yippee im first. Oops sorry frist
such fun!
Right best i have a little read above now………….. yawn!
August 13th, 2008 at 9:17 am
Garth I started the reply to your question on the last thread - would you like me to repeat it over here?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:18 am
Assume assume assume.
I’d rather get on with some work.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:18 am
Hmmm, interesting…
August 13th, 2008 at 9:19 am
noseycow Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 9:17 am
Garth I started the reply to your question on the last thread - would you like me to repeat it over here?
———————-
Carry on nosey……….
August 13th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Garthy - for the second time of asking…
1 - leave twins in room alone when you are ’sure’ you other daughter has been abducted
2- while the whole town is out searching - making 11 (ish) phone calls to friends and family
3 -The content of those 11 phone calls was false - window / shutter not jemmied and door not locked.
I’ll continue when you’ve answered the above
August 13th, 2008 at 9:20 am
It’s more than interesting! Isn’t this withholding evidence? With intent to make a shed-load of money.
Fucking extortionate or what?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:21 am
What will be interesting AZ is how the piranhas will feed of dead bait.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:22 am
Garth… so????
August 13th, 2008 at 9:23 am
Says it all really this doesn’t it!
Why are the bizzies not breaking his door down to get the pictures?
Or is it like KMs diary and Cuddle-Cat?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:26 am
noseycow Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Garthy - for the second time of asking…
1 - leave twins in room alone when you are ’sure’ you other daughter has been abducted
2- while the whole town is out searching - making 11 (ish) phone calls to friends and family
3 -The content of those 11 phone calls was false - window / shutter not jemmied and door not locked.
I’ll continue when you’ve answered the above
—————–
Nosey, if i wasn’t such a good looking git I’d pull my hair out!
1. You and I know she wasnt sure. It was more a strong feeling hmm?
But anyway, I hardly think an abductor was going to come back in nick another child do you? This aint 101 bleedin dalmations ffs.
2. Whats wrong in that?
3. Erm ……….. could you explain how you know the content of those phone calls and why you believe them to be incorrect?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:27 am
Yes Nosey, your first point is expecially disturbing…. I could never get around that ! Strange to say the least
August 13th, 2008 at 9:27 am
Sorry, I meant especially :9
August 13th, 2008 at 9:28 am
BOUNTYHUNTER HONEY!
Just seen this whilst looking for another post I want to drag in X
‘If i get back tonight i will check in.
greatest love and admiration for my beloved PM, your s affectionately, Bountyhunter , min. of Warmongering.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx’
Same to you too - and for Matt and Batman!
August 13th, 2008 at 9:30 am
Garth
1 Well they hardly thought that Madeleine would be abducted when they left her alone now did they?
2- agreed - may just be their way
3 - 5 people they phoned where interveiwed on camera the next day - all saying the same thing . Shutters jemmied, door locked. Thats how I know.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:32 am
Photos? surfacing after all this time? wow.
Coco are you still here? Thought you were off…….. ??
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Coco said….
But now coolandcalm has arrived I am going to fuck off because she winds me up and bugs me.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:36 am
Carmen
you missed some…
3a - changing into matching outfits for your first press conference (sweet hey)
3b - setting up not 1 but 2 web sites within the first week (I suspect the first one just wasn’t up to standard
)
3c - applying for a patent within 10 days (don’t know how soon they application started)
3d - Putting twins in creche on 7th May this is my personal clincher
3e - deleting you mobile phone messages during the night that your daughter went missing.
3f - one of the nanny’s said the twins were not in the room initially but they were definately there when the police arrived.
Noseycow’s taxi duties call - bbl
August 13th, 2008 at 9:36 am
noseycow Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 9:30 am
Garth
1 Well they hardly thought that Madeleine would be abducted when they left her alone now did they?
2- agreed - may just be their way
3 - 5 people they phoned where interveiwed on camera the next day - all saying the same thing . Shutters jemmied, door locked. Thats how I know.
———————-
But the shutters had been tampered with. You have to rememeber in a state of panic things to get exagerated. She feared the worst. She was possibly trying to convince any and everyone of her fear.
Personally i think you fail to understand what a state of panic can do to you. Logical thinking does not happen to all. Not everyone can be cool calm and collected in such a situation.
Kates reactions have been reported to be in a state of hysteria almost. That must tell yo something?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:37 am
COOLANDCALM libel COOLANDCALM libel COOLANDCALM libel!
COOLANDCALM - You are now the Cuckoo Clam in the dolly set!
coco Says:
August 12th, 2008 at 10:30 pm
coolandcalm (hotandchoppy) says ….
agw…. thanks for the ‘release’. I don’t knowingly libel anyone. (apart from Mr C&C of course)
Coco said! COOLANDCALM - You libelled me this morning!
I noticed that you didn’t even apologise for your pathetic behaviour when you and Pam the Professor Full of Piss were swapping knife stories about my be not being the sharpest knife in the drawer.
I left without saying that you both sounded like two old bags who weren’t getting enough of the old mutton dagger.
LOL! Just thought that I would drag it to your attention again to piss you off!
Libellous scurrilous creature that you are.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:37 am
Garth, let’s say for the sake of argument that the T9 evidence for events after 8.30 pm 3 May 07 is a little uneven, possibly due to a bit of alcohol and a fear of neglect charges.
And let’s also take it that the cctv still is correct, and thus gives us a snapshot of things as at 6 pm on 3 May 07.
If this were a case of stranger abduction, the T9 timeline for 6 pm to 8.30 pm 3 May 2007 ought to be a nice neat package with no inconsistencies. What’s your take on this? Do you agree?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:39 am
Garth Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 9:36 am
edit
But the shutters had been tampered with.
—————————————————————————————————–
Garth where on earth did you get this little gem???
PMSL
August 13th, 2008 at 9:40 am
coolandcalm Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 9:32 am
Photos? surfacing after all this time? wow.
Coco are you still here? Thought you were off…….. ??
Aha! No I’m not! I’m here while going through my personal fan mail on my pc and then I am going to get the dog’s permission to sleep.
No use stopping on here and ending up being bored to death by your inane witterings of complacency is there? lol
August 13th, 2008 at 9:43 am
Hang on AZ. I’ll be back in a mo.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:43 am
Who are the 3 children in the picture? 2 in high chairs and 1 on Russel O’s lap.
August 13th, 2008 at 9:43 am
Chatelaine!!! One of the best observations yet! Excellent!
August 13th, 2008 at 9:44 am
If the story about the pics is genuine, why did it take 15 months for him/her to do something with them. Anyone know the nationality of the aleeged tourist?
Something here doesn’t ring true. (though if true I would love to see the pics!)
……………………….
Coco, you never answered before, does Mr Coco lock the knife drawer at night? Attention seeking behaviour is such a bummer isn’t it?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:47 am
morning all
just a couple of questions., if thie photo is genuine, where exactly did k & g sit? could they see the apartment from that window? why are the other children there in high chairs, when they were supposed to be in the apartment with a baby moniter or whatever? where are k & g if they were supposed to be at the table first?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:50 am
coco
could you put it in a tupperware dish for me please, i may freeze some!
welcome aboard carmen, i personally am going to make it my business to negotiate with ministers all over the globe to get fantastic deals on refreshments of the alcoholic variety. Have brilliant arrangement with m3 to bring in lots of duty free fags!
August 13th, 2008 at 9:50 am
Garth Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 9:26 am
You and I know she wasnt sure. It was more a strong feeling hmm?
********************************************************
Didn’t she say she was absolutely sure, the moment she went into the children’s bedroom? That there was something which made her know Madeleine had been abducted but she couldn’t say what it was because of Portuguese secrecy laws? (I don’t think she has explained what it was, even now that those secrecy laws no longer apply).
noseycow Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 9:30 am
2- while the whole town is out searching - making 11 (ish) phone calls to friends and family
3 -The content of those 11 phone calls was false - window / shutter not jemmied and door not locked.
*************************************************************************
And weren’t the phone calls deleted from the memories of both their mobile phones soon afterwards? Before the police checked them?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:50 am
morning just me
that photo isnt of the tapas bar, its from the beach bar before they went for dinner, i think