Madeleine McCann: Amaral Accuses Kate McCann
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann and Gerry McCann
SKY NEWS: “Cop’s Wife Attacks Kate McCann”
Physically?
The wife of the Portuguese detective, sacked from the Madeleine McCann investigation, has launched an emotional attack on the missing girl’s mother.
It’s Mrs Goncalo Amaral, also known as Sofia Amaral, wife of the author. Kate McCann has been in conversation with Portuguese organ Expresso. She used the opportunity to build bridges by calling Mr Amaral “a disgrace”.
Now Sophia Amaral appears in Portuguese newspaper Correio to offer her reply.
“My dear, Kate McCann…”
Sarcasm?
“You will forgive my boldness, but after I read your comment [in the Expresso interview] concerning Goncalo Amaral, my husband and the father of my daughters, I cannot avoid sending you these words of gratefulness.”
As a parent…
“As a coordinator of criminal investigation for the Polícia Judiciária, my husband has always refused to sit around from nine to five in the comfortable chair in his office, as his hierarchical status implies.”
He preferred the café?
“Instead, he spent the day (and very often the night) with the investigators on the terrain, coordinating searches, surveillances, apprehensions and other diligences.”
In the café?
“…this dedication” stopped Mr Amaral from being promoted because “he had no time to go to Lisbon to parade himself up and down the corridors of the PJ’s Institute” - “A disgrace, madam, a disgrace!”
For shame!
Mr Amaral “left his own daughters to go looking for a child that he had never met and whose parents had neglected her”…
Lucky he never met or, or else the Portuguese police might have made him a suspect.
“It was a pity that my dear friend Mrs Kate was not around anymore at that date, because you could have been very helpful to me in explaining these ‘obvious reasons’ that led to their father’s dismissal, to our daughters”…
Priorities, and all that.
“My dear friend Mrs Kate, without wishing to bother you any further, I would like to request one last favour from you: now that you have started to tell some truths, please continue, and let the world hear the truth that it has been waiting for.”
It’s J’Accuse, in Portuguese - albeit without any evidence, any suspects, or any idea what crime has been committed, if any…
– Dear Madam,
Excuse my audacity, but after learning about your comment in your interview with the newspaper, Expresso, on the subject of Gonçalo Amaral, my husband and father of my daughters, I have to send you these words of thanks. For many years I have been trying to make myself understood with this feeling that unites you and I “….and his behaviour is a disgrace professionally and as a person”…
Consider this:
a) Professionally
– As coordinator of criminal investigation for the PJ, my husband has always refused to sit comfortably behind his desk, from 9 to 5, which is usual for his rank.
Instead of that, he spent the day (and sometimes the night) on the ground with the investigators, coordinating “on the spot” searches, surveillance, seizures and other duties. What a disgrace! But if this was just about being exposed to the elements, things wouldn’t be serious, because as madam Kate knows, the weather here is not bad. The problem is his commitment to the cause which has cost him promotion in his career. I will explain, because this case is contemporary to the search for your daughter. My husband was involved as senior coordinator, and between seizures of drugs, kidnappings and murders, he succeeded in producing a theory about drug trafficking by sea, which he defended before a jury in Lisbon, who congratulated him.
Full of hope, Gonçalo Amaral returned to the Algarve to await the result. It was with astonishment that he learned that he had been passed over by other colleagues (coordinators as it happens, to tell the truth), because he had not managed to get himself into “professonal training” settings. And yes, madam Kate, my husband spent his life working, in the midst of complex investigations. He was the man in Portugal who seized most drugs, but as he didn’t have the time to parade himself in the corridors of the PJ’s institution, he was not promoted. A disgrace, madam, a disgrace!
As you must know, because you seem very well informed to me, my husband’s salary was barely 1.5 times the minimum wage of your country. However, as a wife, mother and Portuguese, I cannot complain, given that Gonçalo Amaral’s salary was the equivalent of 4.5 times the minimum wage in Portugal. Pay attention to this, which serves as an example of what I am going to explain: at one time, an individual shot an officer of the PSP and fled into neighbouring Spain. Between the comings and goings of a PJ team, of which my husband was a part, they were there for more than 15 days.
At that time, international expenses were 100€. As madam Kate can imagine, it is not possible on that amount to eat and to lodge in Spain, still less when it is Christmas Eve, and this amount would only be available (with a bit of luck) by Easter. Even with that, Gonçalo Amaral never refused, not even for a day, to search for the evasive murderer, thus increasing our family budget. And this is only one example amongst many. I once suggested to him the creation of a fund, or something else for dealing with these extraordinary expenses, but he never listened to me. While we too had our mortgage to pay…A disgrace, Madam Kate, a disgrace!
b) Also as an individual, his behaviour is a disgrace, because it was never possible to distinguish or to have a private life with the way of working he chose. However, and if my dear friend Madam Kate will allow me, I can give some examples: Five years ago, a child called Joana “disappeared.” The mother, just like Madam Kate, tried to project the case into the media, but this was as far as she got…After 8 days, came the confessions and the evidence: During an incestuous act between the mother and the uncle, the child was beaten, later cut into pieces and her body disposed of, no one knows where. The mother and the uncle were imprisoned, with the trial coordinated by Gonçalo Amaral, and bringing each of them nearly 20 years in prison. But going back a bit.
The child died on September 12th. On Christmas Eve, our family were together to begin our prayers, when my husband asked me to prepare a bag with food and warm clothes, because he had not yet carried out his Christmas act of contrition and penitence. Try to imagine, Madam Kate, where Gonçalo Amaral took himself that Christmas night when there was torrential rain and roaring thunder? To the Olhao prison establishment, where João Cipriano, Joana’s uncle, was a prisoner; confessed murderer and clinically declared a psychopath. For my husband, giving alms to a beggar did not represent any sacrifice.
On the other hand, joining and sharing his Christmas meal with João Cipriano was the sacrifice he offered to God in memory of Joana. And isn’t that a disgrace? Know this, Madam Kate, every year, on September 12th, my husband requests a mass for Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro. He says that no one else will remember the poor child. But people remember to accuse him unjustly of acts and crimes which he has never committed. Isn’t that a disgrace, Madam Kate?
I will relate one last story, which still costs me to talk about. This year, in May, we started the process of moving our family to Portimao. My husband’s holiday was supposed to start the day after your daughter disappeared. “For obvious reasons,” that didn’t happen. I started a new job, I looked at houses, I made the move and I tried to settle our daughters into new schools with new routines.
All that alone, without any support from my husband, who, for obvious reasons, was looking for your daughter, Madam Kate. In October, on the day of his birthday, a week after our daughters had started the new school year, Gonçalo Amaral was dismissed and returned to Faro. It was supposed to be a time of the family getting together, but in fact it was even more of a separation. Isn’t that a disgrace? Our daughters have never understood, and we have never succeeded in explaining to them what the obvious reasons were that justified a father leaving his daughters to look for a child he didn’t know and whom the parents neglected. A disgrace that my dear friend Kate was not there at that time. Perhaps you could have helped us explain the “obvious reasons” to our children for their father’s being sent back.
To finish, on the intimate subject of Gonçalo Amaral, I can only tell you that he is exactly as the Latinos have a reputation for: a wild one, and my modesty does not allow me to say any more.
I ask my dear friend to forgive these thoughts of a wife and mother, but I am sure you will understand. I will finish this missive by asking you to pass on to your mother my sincere compliments. She seemed very sincere to me when, during an interview, she said she had the urge to slap those who had left her grandchildren alone. She spoke as openly as a true Portuguese grandmother would have done.
My dear friend Madam Kate, without wishing to bother you any further, I would like you to do me a last favour: now that you are starting to let the truth come out, don’t stop, go on, and tell the truth the world is waiting to hear.
With my best regards,
Sofia Leal
(Wife and mother of Gonçalo Amaral’s children.)

September 18th, 2008 at 7:44 am
Blınk
September 18th, 2008 at 7:50 am
Please let her sue !
September 18th, 2008 at 7:51 am
And please let the British press publish it in full
September 18th, 2008 at 7:56 am
Good to see it’s still all about finding a missing child
September 18th, 2008 at 8:11 am
Anorak Says:
September 18th, 2008 at 7:56 am
Good to see it’s still all about finding a missing child
—————————————————————-
Point scoring more like.
A case of - ‘ My husbands better than yours’
September 18th, 2008 at 8:11 am
Have they really mentioned it on sky news?
September 18th, 2008 at 8:13 am
This is a link to a good post by “Binky” on Sky discussions:-
http://blogs.news.sky.com/discussions/show.html?plckForumPage=ForumDiscussion&plckDiscussionId=Cat:746f9309-1bb1-4b07-ad11-647f5ba16800Forum:4237bf3e-0948-444d-a452-46289a2fd1f7Discussion:92ceddf5-0f01-4fcc-9ddb-3af0cbb232b1&plckCurrentPage=658&sid=sl.sky.com
This is the paragraph that I particularly like:-
“One thing I wish to add, if the ppl of pt are putting pressure on their authorities for answers, it’s more than the ppl of the UK are doing. |Apart from chat on forums like these, where are the hard questions being asked? Not by the media, not the Mc’s, not the politicians, nowhere that I can see?”
September 18th, 2008 at 8:14 am
“My dear friend Madam Kate, without wishing to bother you any further, I would like you to do me a last favour: now that you are starting to let the truth come out, don’t stop, go on, and tell the truth the world is waiting to hear.”
Come on then KM. Just do it. Take whatever you took before the ‘whoosh clunk’ interview, and go for it. In public. With a decent interviewer. Paxman springs to mind.
The world is waiting for the truth about what happened to a little girl all that long time ago. And one day, you have to understand, the world WILL find out what happened to that little girl.
September 18th, 2008 at 8:22 am
“It’s very unusual for the anonymous wife of a policeman to speak out in this way,” says Brunt, “She clearly feels he has been very harshly treated.
“Some might feel the form of her attack on Kate McCann is very clever, it’s dripping with sarcasm.
“She paints a picture of an over-worked, hard done-by detective that’s very different to the image portrayed in the media.”
————————
I wonder who else will mention it ?
September 18th, 2008 at 8:41 am
brandon flours Says:
September 18th, 2008 at 8:22 am
Dunno….but I hope that, unlike Sky, they print on the letter in full…and without
any editing.
After all, Dr K’s letter to Mr Rebelo was published in full.
September 18th, 2008 at 8:54 am
“leaving his daughters to look for a child he didn’t know ”
well, isn`that his job were he is payed for?
Now one knows the truth, so please stop this jawing match.
greetings from germany
mamablue
September 18th, 2008 at 9:26 am
Mamablue:
You missed a bit: “Our daughters have never understood, and we have never succeeded in explaining to them what the obvious reasons were that justified a father leaving his daughters to look for a child he didn’t know and whom the parents neglected.” It’s the ‘whom the parents neglected’ bit which is important in what Amaral’s wife is saying, not the fact that he was doing his job.
Not sure what you mean by ‘jawing match’, but surely the whole reason for these posts is discussion about the case?
September 18th, 2008 at 9:29 am
I wonder who else will mention it ?
——–
if you read it on sky, they haven’t mentioned it either.
their article doesn’t include the word ‘neglect’, though the letter does twice.
why not, i wonder?
September 18th, 2008 at 9:31 am
Thank you Mrs Amaral for their courage and their open words.A woman, that has expierence for a lot of years in the ups and downs of police work and she sit probably often alone at home. Thanks to the anorak the entire letteris was reprinted in at one british paper
after watching the various-I hope not reduced -videos-after readingthe published police filesI have only one question:
Can anyone explain to me why the british police not take action? The dogs are admitted as an evidence in UK or aren’t they? Low Copy DNa too? Where’s the problem?
Eddie signals a death body, Keela finds tracks after eddie, there are no signs of a break in.There are are 9 adults and at least one person knows the truth.Why not sit all 9 members of the group on a police department and will be questioned every day? Why not ?
September 18th, 2008 at 9:32 am
Mamablue
He was due to go on holiday, other people already on holiday couldn’t manage to look after her - but, of course, parental pleasures come first and a policemans lot is not a happy one
September 18th, 2008 at 9:33 am
“leaving his daughters to look for a child he didn’t know ”
well, isn`that his job were he is payed for?
—————-
so his holidays and his kid’s holidays dont matter, he should not whine, because he’s paid to give up his holidays to look for a child who’s parents obviously neglected her.
kate got family allowance.
i’d say she was paid to do HER job, i’e see that M has some care rather than being left to babysit two 18 month old babies.
isn’t that Her job then, that she was paid for?
AND he paid his own mortgage, rather than dupe people who thought their cash was going to look for the child!
September 18th, 2008 at 9:42 am
morning all
Havnt been on for a while, but when is amarals book being published in this country?
September 18th, 2008 at 9:43 am
Firestar says: “if you read it on sky, they haven’t mentioned it either.
their article doesn’t include the word ‘neglect’, though the letter does twice.
why not, i wonder?”
****************************************************************************
That is absolutely appalling! How can they justify missing out the word ‘neglect’ if it appears in the letter? Is it that they’re terrified of being sued by the McCanns, or is there more to it?
Indiansummer: “Can anyone explain to me why the british police not take action? The dogs are admitted as an evidence in UK or aren’t they? Low Copy DNa too? Where’s the problem?
Eddie signals a death body, Keela finds tracks after eddie, there are no signs of a break in.There are are 9 adults and at least one person knows the truth.Why not sit all 9 members of the group on a police department and will be questioned every day? Why not ?”
*****************************************************************************
Absolutely. Why on earth not? Why the apparent reluctance of the British police to get involved?
September 18th, 2008 at 9:44 am
morning WTF
Good to see you back
September 18th, 2008 at 9:48 am
morning wtf.
September 18th, 2008 at 9:49 am
As a policeman it’s his job to investigate wrongdoing by others. Wrongdoing by others includes leaving your small children alone and undefended. Therefore it WAS his job to investigate what happened to this little girl who was left on her own.
Also there are degrees of leaving little children on their own.
Constant patrolling by all parents - iffy
Checking them every 15 minutes - not good
Checking them every 30 minutes - bad
Checking them every hour - heinous
Leaving them to cry for over an hour (if they did that) - unforgiveable.
Still doesn’t mean they killed her.
September 18th, 2008 at 9:49 am
mods, my last post got spambotted ? is it possible to dig it out ? sorry, wonder if the spambot doesn’t cope with with certain types of file extensions.
September 18th, 2008 at 9:51 am
Still doesn’t mean they killed her.
————–
even though she’d still be alive if they hadn’t used her as a cheap babysitter.
September 18th, 2008 at 9:53 am
Also there are degrees of leaving little children on their own.
——–
yes, one degree is leaving them in one room while you’re in another.
another degree is pissing off to the ale house to get pissed and play pub games.
September 18th, 2008 at 9:54 am
AND WHY ARE YOU STUPID FUCKERS DEFENDING THIS?
September 18th, 2008 at 9:59 am
thats what i don’t understand.
why are a certain set of posters in support of leaving little kids to fend for themselves?
who in their right mind can defend a pair of losers like the mccanns?
is it guilt or what, or are they just tring to wind people up?
it’s not so long back that anyone who treated their kids that way would be unable to walk down the street unmolested, yet the like of watcher are trying to get us to believe there are ‘ degrees ‘of child endangerment?
why not play on the M1 for a while, but feel secure in some spurious ‘checks’?
some people want their heads testing.
September 18th, 2008 at 10:00 am
Firestar , ditto
September 18th, 2008 at 10:04 am
watcher
do you think M is still alive?
September 18th, 2008 at 10:04 am
the skynews presentation of the letter is so loaded.
September 18th, 2008 at 10:05 am
sam
if you read the end of the comments, people on the sky comments are discussing if the anorak letter is a fake, it’s so different.