
Madeleine McCann: Three New British Suspects
IT’S the media’s Summer of Maddy - and the media is watching the McCanns’ detectives watching “paedo” Raymond Hewlett…
In the News of the World, Keith Gladdis delivers:
“Maddie suspect’s past fits crime“
Says the cracker:
A COP who interrogated Madeleine McCann suspect Raymond Hewlett says the case carries all the hallmarks of the sick sex beast.
Sick sex beast in tautology terror!
Former Detective Superintendent Trevor Wilkinson spent years on the trail of the convicted paedophile, who was in Portugal when Maddie vanished two years ago.
And Mr Wilkinson told the News of the World the snatching of the child from her holiday apartment matches the predator’s offending profile.
Hewlett is a convicted sex criminal. A paedo! But does that fact alone link him to the disappearance of Our Maddie?
He said: “He is constantly looking for prey and we know he is prepared to enter a property to get to a child, which he’s done.”
Hewlett, 64, critically ill with cancer in a German hospital, has been jailed three times for kidnap and molesting young girls and is connected to a string of other attacks on kids.
Mr Wilkinson questioned him in 1992 while investigating the 1975 murder of 11-year old Lesley Molseed in Rochdale.
In “Irish haven of Madeleine suspect” , the Irish Independent looks at that matter:
Raymond Hewlett, the convicted paedophile who has emerged as a suspect in the Madeleine McCann case, travelled back and forth between Britain and Ireland from the mid-Seventies until 1999…
Hewlett was regarded as a suspect in the rape and murder of 11-year-old Leslie Molseed in October 1975 on the Yorkshire Moors. The day after the murder, Hewlett, who had been living in the Rochdale area where Leslie lived, left Yorkshire and travelled to Ireland, where he is believed to have stayed for over a year.
Oh, yeah…
He returned when West Yorkshire Police arrested Stefan Kiszko, who was wrongfully convicted of the murder and served 16 years in prison before being cleared.
Hewlett was eventually cleared of murder Leslie Molseed in 2006, when a cold case investigation led to low cell DNA analysis of Leslie’s clothes finding traces of semen which were traced to Ronald Castree, who was convicted in 2007.
So Hewlett is being linked to major case the media can hang their hat on but a crime he did not commit. He…
“…abducted a 12-year-old girl and took her to the moors near his home in Todmorden, West Yorkshire. He incapacitated her with a rag soaked in paint thinners and was in the process of attempting to rape her when, a subsequent court heard, he prematurely ejaculated, and the girl escaped. He received only one year’s imprisonment. He was also suspected of sexually assaulting another young girl in Manchester in 1975, though never charged or convicted.
In 1978, Hewlett attacked another 14-year-old girl, putting a gun to her head. She managed to escape. He received a four-year jail term for attempted rape. He received another jail sentence for the attempted rape of 14-year-old in 1988.
Back in the News of the World:
Ex-detective Dave Edgar and his team have gathered new information in the Algarve and say there is a strong possibility Maddie is alive.
A source said: “Dave is keeping an open mind on Hewlett.”
Ooops! Cancel the lynch mob! Come baaaaaack….
Oh, no matter. Ride out and ride fast. Hewlett will get what’s coming to him, right? As the Star reports:
MADDIE: THREE BRITS PROBED
Jonathan Corke has more news that Hewlett is not the only man to have the finger pointed at him:
THREE Britons are now being investigated in the case of missing Madeleine McCann.
Lancashire-born convicted paedophile Raymond Hewlett was last week named as a possible suspect.
And the Daily Star Sunday can reveal that claims about two more people are being scrutinised by the team working for Maddie’s parents, Kate and Gerry McCann.
Name names:
A fourth Brit, also a convicted paedophile, has been ruled out.
Says the McCanns’ spokesman, Clarence Mitchell:
“A handful of calls with substantive information is being followed up. Raymond Hewlett is just one line of inquiry among several.”
So it might nto be him, then? He is one name of many.
Reports in Portugal are saying that local police ruled him out of their investigation although he has been described as still dangerous to children and sources say he is wanted for questioning about an unsolved attack in Yorkshire.
So he was cleared by the police. Move on:
The McCanns’ private team – retired detectives Dave Edgar and Arthur Cowley – intend to interview him “within days”.
Our source said: “It’s important to remember that Hewlett is just one avenue in the investigation. There are other leads being looked at.”
But in the Summer Of Maddie Hewlett grabs the headlines…
The Mail says:
‘Maddie paedophile’ under investigation for four months
Yeah, Hewlett is no longer just a paedo - he’s the “Maddie Paedo”.
Detectives have been investigating the predatory paedophile who was living in Portugal near to where Madeleine McCann disappeared for the past four months.
Adding:
‘Some of his alibis didn’t quite stand up,’ said a source close to the family.
So it might be him?
But despite concerns about his movements on the night Madeleine disappeared in May 2007, and sinister comments he allegedly made about her, he is not thought to be a strong suspect.
But he’s the “Maddie Paedophile“?
In the Mirror, there is what now passes for evidence:
Paedo Raymond Hewlett admits visiting Maddie holiday flats
The British paedophile linked to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has sensationally confessed to being outside her holiday apartment “many times”.
Convicted pervert Raymond Hewlett, 64, has admitted knowing the resort where the McCanns were holidaying “very well” and said he had parked a van close to their complex on several occasions.
At the time of the child’s disappearance? Er, we don’t know. Anyhow, get this:
Speaking exclusively to the Sunday Mirror, former Scots Guard Peter Verran, 46, revealed… “We got talking at the toilet block. He brought Madeleine up straight away. He said his three-year-old daughter looked like her.
“He was worried that because there had been reports that Madeleine may have been spirited away to Morocco, people might think his child was her. Then he suddenly said, ‘Madeleine’s not in Morocco’.
“I asked him what he meant and he said he knew Praia Da Luz really well. He knew the Ocean Club complex where the McCanns had been staying. He said he’d been there many times and had often parked his van close to the apartment.
“He said he knew the layout of the place, the flat and the restaurant where the McCanns and their friends had been eating when Maddie disappeared. He had a lot of detail about the layout. He said there was no way that the child could be taken without the parents seeing. He said they were lying.”
Man in Praia Da Luz area talks about Madeleine McCann! Read all about it.
Hewlett, meanwhile, says he is innocent:
MADDIE SUSPECT: I’LL TAKE LIE TEST
Get Jeremy Kyle now:
Madeleine McCann suspect Raymond Hewlett is ready to take a LIE DETECTOR test to prove his innocence in the case…
But police face a race against time to establish the truth, as last night doctors were battling to keep Hewlett alive after complications following a cancer op.
Run!
As Hewlett lay critical in hospital, his German wife Mariana Schmucker, 33 - mum to their six children - challenged Maddie’s parents Gerry and Kate to come to see her.
She said: “I know about my Raymond’s past and it is forgotten. He is a changed man. I know he didn’t take Maddie.
“He is a very sick man and has said to me he will do anything to prove he is innocent - even take a lie detector test.
“Let the parents of Madeleine come here and ask him face-toface if he had anything to do with their child going missing.
“My husband has nothing to do with little Madeleine. He’s an innocent man and he’ll prove it not anyone.”
Enough on him. Let’s have some proper speculation. And for that we turn to the Express:
MADELEINE: THE MISSED CLUES AT £1M VILLA
STATEMENTS: Witnesses tell of suspicious behaviour at house and toys in secret video den
James Murray and Ted Jeory have more…
Madeleine McCANN may have been taken to a luxury villa just half a mile from where she was abducted, Portuguese detectives were told.
Suspicions were raised because of the behaviour of the people who rented the £1million villa and because video cameras were reportedly seen there along with pictures of children on a wall, the Sunday Express has learned.
Pictures of children on a wall inside a house. Sickos!
Our revelations come as West Yorkshire police prepare to fly to Germany to question 64-year-old convicted paedophile Raymond Hewlett over a sex attack on a girl 25 years ago.
And back we go…
Madeleine McCann is missing - still missing…
Pictures Of All The Madeleine McCann Suspects
Madeleine McCann: The Story In Pictures
Posted: 24th, May 2009 | In: Key Posts, Madeleine McCann, Media Comments (12) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





May 25th, 2009 at 11:08 pm
J. Donner: It’s a pretty confusing subject. What anorak does so well is to extract pieces of information, speculation and sometimes even news(!) from the media and leaves the reader to make up their own mind. Stick with it.
May 25th, 2009 at 8:04 pm
10 - Maybe. But trying to make sense of PR and speculation every day is not that easy. This is best round-up of the media’s take on the case. I urge you to reread it and try to follow the media’s argument…
May 25th, 2009 at 2:03 am
The author who wrote this article lacks any writing skills, it’s just utterly confusing…sigh
May 24th, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Scotfree, you’re right that it would be unusual for a paedophile who prefers teen or (just) pre teen girls to start attacking younger girls, but it’s certainly not impossible. There’s a theory that paedophiles could start losing the thrill they get from their “usual” victims and start seeking younger ones. This is how it’s thought a lot of men (it’s usually men) start trawling the net for pictures of ever younger children, having started maybe with “barely legals” etc.
We shall see…. or maybe not, sadly.
May 24th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
Hi Cheryl!
Lovely weather here for once! Just been enjoying a lazy time in the garden.
I agree about the sanctimonious thing. It was clearly wrong, or, at least, very unwise, to leave the children, even for short periods of time, but most people make mistakes or takes chances sometimes. (That’s precisely why people were so shocked. So many felt that exactly the same thing could have happened to them.)
Anyway, the Mcs were going to come in for criticism, whatever, so, if it appeared likely to them that Madeleine might have wandered out, I think they’d have said so. Why not? Until I see evidence for a different view, I have to trust what the Mcs appear to believe, ie. that Madeleine could not have opened the patio doors, the window and shutters or the front(back?) door herself and let herself out. Kate saw the apartment at 10.00pm; we didn’t. If they have ultimately rejected the idea of her having wandered out, they’re probably right. Why suggest abduction instead of the wandering out theory? Abduction wouldn’t let them off the hook with regard to having left the kids in the first place because of all the obvious risks. The official police investigation didn’t suggest it, which I think they would have if it had been a reasonable theory.
May 24th, 2009 at 3:16 pm
C&C, good morning. Don’t feel bad, I got moderated and comment pulled yesterday as they wanted me to prove my statements I made. I did!
Interesting, am I wrong in recalling that most times over the past year and a half when some of the usual posters wrote nasties their fall back was this was a satire site and it was just satire they were writing? When did the MM thread turn serious and one can no longer claim they are writing satire? Some posters got away with crucifing the McCanns under the guise of satire.
Don’t tell me the latest schoolyard bully has people worried!
May 24th, 2009 at 3:02 pm
That is true, Scotfree, paedos usually have their age and sex preferences. However, imo they share a like depraved sick mind. Hewlett could be helpful, if he is so inclined, in sharing some thoughts, MO’s used by others, maybe even names he has heard who might be of interest to the Investigators.
May 24th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Once innocuous comments are moderated then obviously its time for me to give up on Anorak which is no longer a satirical thread.
Moderator _ It was removed because of the initials. Anorak is satirical, the MM threads are not
May 24th, 2009 at 1:31 pm
C&C
I remember back a few years ago was going home from the pub with my friends and we proved to the local constabulary we were capable of getting home as we were following the white line….the panda car stopped a few yards ahead , and he held open the door for all of us to get to be taken home, ..there wasn’t a white line.
That was back in the days of local bobby knew our dads
May 24th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
Hey! I’m usually v. good about treading carefully!
May 24th, 2009 at 10:38 am
It speaks of desperation, doesn’t it?
Front page on some gospel spreading media and a one or two sentences in others. Perhaps we’ll know more when the Police have interviewed him.
But with all the revelations about his past crimes, he’s hardly going to get a fair hearing on this even if proved beyond doubt it wasn’t him.
But isn’t he meant to be one of some new ‘interests’
And isn’t Madeleine just missing anyway?
May 24th, 2009 at 9:53 am
Why is it that the papers are taking statements from former police that say Hewlett’s previous M.O. fits in with the scenario in the McCann case, while at the same time ignoring the facts of the M.O. where it is stated that he had previously attacked young girls aged 11-14 years old.
Also are we in for a rethink on the abduction theory, to make the ‘facts’ fit with Hewlett’s ‘guilt’ . I mean is it truly credible that a 61/2 year old man managed to get out of the window carrying a 3 year old child with out leaving any evidence?