Fattest Mum Raises Triplet Babies On McDonald’s
THE country’s “Fattest mother” – Leanne Salt - feeds her triplets on McDonald’s fast food. The children are eight-months-old.
The woman’s name? Mrs Salt.
And so we add a page to Anorak’s Nominative Determinalism Guide Book.
Mrs Salt weighed 40 stone when she gave birth to her three children - Deanna, Daisy and Finlee. She weighs over 30 stone now. Leanne Salt is 24.
Says she in Closer magazine:
“My babies were six months old when they had their first McDonald’s. They had chicken nuggets and chops and loved it.”
Adding:
“Anyway, they don’t always have junk food - sometimes I’ll cook them a microwave lasagne. Babies are always hungry – sometimes it’s easier to give them food that’s already prepared.”
At 2pm on the dot each child eats a packet of Wotsits.
The children look fine as they dandle on a place where Leanne’s knees might be.
But the story is all a cue for the magazine medics to say that the children are not fine and are going to live lingering horrible lives being morbidly obese with stomachs with their own post codes and no friends and a sex life as out of reach as their genitals.
If there is one thing we can glean from the massively fat it is that they love eating fatty, fast food and were it not for a patronising know-better media in cahoots with a nannying Government the fat would be free to be happy to make their own choices and not be held up as freaks for the thin to gawp at and pity and put on drugs in therapy suites.
Get this from the Telegraph:
While extreme, their case illustrates the crisis of childhood obesity in Britain, where a quarter of five-year-olds are too fat according to government figures.
Who says you are too fat? And what are you “too fat” for?
Recent research from the World Cancer Research Fund found that babies who gain weight too quickly in the first months of life could be more likely to be overweight later, putting them at risk of diseases including Type 2 diabetes, heart disease and cancer.
Yeah, could. Such are the facts.
Leanne says “big is beautiful”.
And thanks to nice check from Closer she now has the cash to be even bigger…
Image: Unique Daily
Posted: 28th, April 2009 | In: Media Comments (16) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
September 2nd, 2009 at 11:27 pm
Do you reckon DF is a fat American who doesn’t shower or am I just being nasty after a couple of glasses of red?
Yup. I’ve seen a z where there should be an s so I’ve got the American bit right. (That’s a zed not a zee btw).
September 2nd, 2009 at 10:02 pm
She should be quite skinny then after three months , and stink to the high heavens…shall we leave DF alone with her to inhale the lovely fresh smell?
September 2nd, 2009 at 9:51 pm
Er, she’s been left alone since 1st May.
If you were minding your own business, what are you doing here?
September 2nd, 2009 at 9:21 pm
OH MY GOD!!! WHATEVER SHALL OUR NANNY STATE SOCIETY DO ABOUT THIS TRAVESTY!!!! Get real people, you need to seriously leave this woman ALONE. You fat phobic Euros are ridiculous in the extreme when it comes to stuff like this. I almost feel sorry for you because you live in a society being fat is considered close to a mortal sin but on the other hand your personal hygiene habits are somewhere between non existent and barely adequate. Try a little prioritization in regard to your own personal habits for once and mind your own damn business when it comes to the lives of others.
May 1st, 2009 at 7:56 am
I want to know how Doc E got his kid from a rescue centre.
May 1st, 2009 at 12:13 am
Dr Eggman
On the whole we do care more for our animals, or it could be because we give getting them more conscious thought? and the short time they are with us.
Its usual that babies appear, and it was regarded as odd or strange that they don’t- but people do seem to enjoy their babies, its once they become toddlers onwards with minds of their own that the problems start.
Although whenever we rescued abused pets we always alerted the Social services and vice versa.
My day job is still caring for animals, and in return for my services people do pay me a lot of money, and the vast majority of pets I care for are cleaner and better fed and behaved than a lot of children.
Siamese cats? shall be looking after two for the next 25 days, around day 24? or so , they might notice me! I like Abyssinians - they are fun, but dogs really do it for me
April 30th, 2009 at 9:56 pm
June, hi, I was making the point that we seem as a nation,to care more about our animals than kids. I have one kid and two cats from a rescue centre. My Ma and Pa now look after my German Shepherd, who was from Battersea. No complaints about rehoming per se, but I have found that a lot of them put too many obstacles in your way. My own personal experience of that was when I offered to rehome a Siamese cat, I as told No, they are “special cats” that take a lot of looking after. Today, I was responsible for looking after 50 odd prisoners and I then came home to look after my daughter. A cat is a doddle after that. And Siamese cats are just cats. My friend Tony who owns two, told me that.
But like I said, I did digress somewhat!
And well done for looking after the unwanted moggies and doggies and I apologise to anyone who does that or knows someone who does that. Big respect to you.
April 30th, 2009 at 2:24 pm
Why are people comparing the results of a natural human function to rehoming pets?
People conceive children whether they want to or not, there is birth control/vasectomy or abortion/adoption or even abstinence, plenty of options to avoid the natural consequences.
Dr Eggman, I’ve spent time rehoming rejected and damaged pets, and its not because I’m elderly (I’m not) its because of the damage fertile morons do to them that we take care where they go next.
April 30th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
It’s easier to have a kid than it is to get a dog or cat from the RSPCA (or other rehoming facilities) All you have to do is, well I think we all know what you have to do, whereas to get a dog or cat, there’s forms to fill in, money to pay, home visit, etc, and all that’s if you get past the elderly ladies looking after the place who, in my experience, don’t actually want you there!! Anyway I digress. Good luck kids, see you on Jeremy Kyle in a few years.
April 30th, 2009 at 11:47 am
..a bit difficult to monitor that one, Michelle - who knows when the pregnancy happens how good or crap the parent(s) is going to be? it is just too easy to get pregnant and too difficult to adopt - at least with adoptive parents you can be relatively sure that no-one would go through all that if they really didn’t want a child…
April 29th, 2009 at 7:11 pm
this is gross. These children are in trouble and its a shame. How pray tell is she going to be able to properly care for these children. How hard is it to make spag bol. All the money she has recieved from all the different newspapers and magazines she has sold her story to should be paid back to the N.H.S to cover the cost of her giving birth. Either that or it should fund fertility treatment for those unable to concieve. but hey thats just my opinion. I think she should be ashamed of herself, she wants to be a good mum well hey how about she shows that by looking after herself so that she can do the things mum’s do for their children clearly how she is raising those children has a lot to be desired, she shouldn’t be able to keep them if she proves that she can’t cope, what am l saying of course she can’t cope. Hence why she doesn’t dress them every day and hmmm am sure we are meant to have lots of rays of sunlight to encourage vitamin D to do what it should for our body. This clearly is a disgrace and what is even more annoying too is that she thinks how she’s behaving is the norm…it says a lot for what future generations are going to be looking up to …she wouldn’t be my hero thats for sure… I really do think that when it comes to having children people should be screened when they are pregnant as if they were adopting and if they dont meet adoption criteria then they should have there children taken off them at birth.
April 29th, 2009 at 11:32 am
No doubt the fat lady doesn’t have a job (unless she’s a singer?) so I guess she’s just breeding more fat kids who’ll sit at home with no idea of what it’s like to work for your money, feel any pride whatsoever or see what their feet look like. Welcome to Labour’s Britain.
April 29th, 2009 at 11:06 am
he’d have needed some reinforced clothing and a miner’s lamp, by the looks of things….
April 29th, 2009 at 7:48 am
I see there is no mention of the father. Perhaps the thought of a lifetime dipping into a family bucket once a week was too much for him
April 29th, 2009 at 7:24 am
Getting bigger by the day though!
April 29th, 2009 at 6:58 am
Aren’t the fat a minority group?