
The Middleton Class - Why Prince William Dumped Kate Middleton
FAREWELL Kate Middleton, The People’s Girlfriend, to Prince William.
Not that Kate ever stood a chance of being Williams’ wife. You see, it’s all a matter of class, breeding if you will.
In “SNOBS WHO DID FOR KATE”, the Mirror looks at the “mates” who “sneered” at Kate’s mother.
It hears “snobby jibes” and “snotty pals” mock Carole Middleton’s past as an air-stewardess. “Doors to manual” they would sneer as Kate moved out of earshot.
A Royal “insider” says of the Middleton matriarch: “She is pushy, rather twee and incredibly middle-class. She uses words such as ‘Pleased to meet you”, ‘toilet’ and ‘pardon’”.
As readers know, the correct terms are “Hello Ma’am”, “What do you do?” and people in polite society never go to the little princess’s room but employ a wallah to do it for them.
“COMMON TAUNTS CAUSED KATE SPLIT,” says the Star.
Mirror readers learn that Carole has a habit of chewing gum. It is our studied belief that Carole should be shot until dead, skinned and her entrails fed to Prince Charles’s organic pigs. We admire Her Majesty’s restraint.
Nonsense, says Arthur Edwards, the obsequious Royal snapper. “It tells us more about the snobbery of the commentators than about the Royal Family.” He cites the success of middle class Sophie Rhys-Jones, wife to The Weed In Tweed that is Prince Edward. If they can enjoy a successful marriage, anyone can.
But the Mail’s A.N. Wilson will not be denied. “She’s got more class than these sneering snobs,” says he.
“How would you feel is your son introduced you to his girlfriend’s parents, and the mother said ‘pleased to meet you’ rather than ‘how d’you do?’ Or asked to use the toilet, rather than the lavatory or the loo?”
Why, says a Mail reader, we’d line her up against the privet and plunge a gardening fork through her heart. Is not life about standards? Without standards, how can we aspire?
Wilson moves on. He says the Queen reportedly “’couldn’t believe it’” when Carole Middleton behaved in such a fashion.
Wilson writes: “Being married to the head of State calls for qualities which middle or working-class women are just as likely to have as the daughter of a duke.”
The Mirror’s Royal raspberry James Whittaker does not agree. Says he: “I just don’t think she had the breeding quite honestly and I’m not being snooty I’m being factual.”
Facts. The lifeblood of newspapers…
Posted: 16th, April 2007 | In: Tabloids Comments (20) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





September 7th, 2008 at 11:06 am
its better for william to find much suitable girl,he was stuck on kate. I don’t believe that he can compare kate to other girl,wake up will!!! she is not your queen!
March 17th, 2008 at 7:41 pm
it’s too bad her pain in the ass mother is behind this. kate seems to really love him, but if the mother is going to be lady macbeth in the background, william is better off without her.
August 14th, 2007 at 5:01 pm
The royal family are so dysfunctional that any mother would be distressed to see what has happend in her offsprings’ lives and the Queen can be no exception.Let us hope that William takes no notice of the snobs around him telling him whom he should or shouldn’t marry. In Kate he has found a young woman of discretion, who is courteous, loyal,intelligent and will take him on. With the backgrounds of Diana’s sons they must be carrying a lot of baggage and William should be thankful he has found someone who will take him on who is so level-headed.
June 22nd, 2007 at 2:54 pm
Jingos Tom!!! So patriotic you are.
One Queen
One Nation
One Tongue
God Save The Queen
One stolen diamond
April 29th, 2007 at 9:46 am
HA-HA
April 28th, 2007 at 4:26 pm
In Oz when I was growing up the toilet was always referred to as the throne. Still can’t get used to hearing that the Queen has been 50 or so years on the Throne!
April 26th, 2007 at 7:22 am
I thought he just wanted to play the field, he’s known what her families been like for the past five years,she is better off without him, as for his mates, aren’t they all drunks and drug dealers/users. They need to look back at the history of their royal families, most of them were either gay, stupid or mad, I wont forget inbread. Will’s mother and father couldn’t keep their pants on with each other, Diana only became a SAINT when she died.
April 25th, 2007 at 10:07 pm
Actually it does matter if the Prince William were to marry a commoner! If that were to happen the royal family would no longer be the great traditional, upright and proper institution, that (thank God) still survives today. If Prince William marry’s a peasant then we might as well just live in the awful socialist hell that the modern Britian seems to want, even though deep down we all wish it was like the good old days.
One Queen
One Nation
One Tongue
God Save The Queen.
April 18th, 2007 at 12:45 am
WHAT?! SHOULD WE HONESTLY FOLLOW A FAMILY THAT ISN’T EVEN PURE-BLOODED ENGLISH TO DICTATE HOW WE SPEAK THE ENGLISH TONGUE….PLEASE!
I’M NOT GETTING ON MY HIGH HORSE, BUT WHAT GIVES CERTAIN PEOPLE THE RIGHT TO DEMEAN OTHERS? I WOULD RATHER SCRATCH MY ARSE, CHEW GUM, SAY “UMM” A LOT AND SWEAR LIKE A SAILOR THAN LOOK LIKE AN EXTRA FROM THE “HILLS HAVE EYES” (YES! I WENT THERE WITH THE INBREEDING) AND THINK THAT PEOPLE ARE COMMON AND BENEATH ME. WE ALL SHIT, EAT AND SLEEP.
THIS ONLY STRENGTHENS THE FACT THAT THE ENGLISH ROYAL FAMILY AND THEIR MINIONS ARE SO OUT OF TOUCH WITH THE COMMON PEOPLE.
April 17th, 2007 at 9:15 am
Very interesting to see that the Times and some other papers comment that Kate’s family is “far too nouveau to marry into the oldest money in the land”. Surely that family is simply a largely German group that arrived only a couple of hundred years ago, whereas Kate’s family are all thoroughly English. In current terminology the family she could have been considering are really asylum seekers, with little claim to their position as proven by many researchers.
April 17th, 2007 at 8:10 am
toilet or no toilet…. loo or lavatory……… they all mean the same thing in the dictionary……… just because she say toilet… that doesn’t mean that she is less a human than they who call it lavatory…… long live KATE….. you will find a true gentleman out there….
April 17th, 2007 at 3:23 am
There’s an Italian proverb “After the game, the King and the Pawn go into the same box.” What is the point in pressurising people to say “lavatory and loo?” when ultimately none of it really matters! What is this all about?? LOL! Kate’s so much better off without this madness!
April 17th, 2007 at 2:09 am
The Lavatory? Maybe Carol Middleton should have asked to use the ‘bog’. or even asked ‘Where’s yer dunny, mate?’ Phew that would have caused a Right Royal stir!!
April 16th, 2007 at 10:32 pm
Kate’s better off out of it, in the long run she will see, better than a living with a bunch of up their own arses dried up cronies for the rest of her life under the scutiny of the royal family and the press. Long live Kate!
April 16th, 2007 at 6:01 pm
The English don’t use the toilet or lavatory…….we just clap our hands,and sing a few lines of God save the Queen………..
April 16th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
Republic anyone?
April 16th, 2007 at 5:32 pm
Not the throne room then? (Sorry)
April 16th, 2007 at 5:19 pm
Don’t ya know, the Royals sh*t rosebuds and pee organic lavender water? Anyway, the correct term in their circles is ‘The Retiring Room’.
April 16th, 2007 at 12:21 pm
This is a new information for me atleast that the British commoners used toilet and the so called high class people used the word lavatory.
April 16th, 2007 at 12:10 pm
Blue TiTs
Weed is the Seed
Billy the Twitch
p.S. Send Kate to me in sunny Salford-by-the-Sea…..i know how to treat birds like Royalty…and Kate will do for me……Iwill feed her my birdseed…love is the drug. Hey Kate, Believe Billy when i say…you did the right thing …to fly away….if you need a place to hide away….me birds box is clean & cute…and free…just like you Kate..
You is a class Lass as I say in salford…..
Be Seeding you Soon
Billy the Blue Blooded Twitcher